Lysaght & Co.

Intellectual Property Newsroom

Archived Information

Please note that the developments listed on this page may not be the most up-to-date. For a list of developments in Intellectual Property within the last 6 months, please go to the following page :-



Vanuatu - New Trade Mark Law

The authorities in Vanuatu have passed a new trade mark law, the Trade Marks Act No. 1 of 2002, which entered into force on 8 February 2011. It is a substantive law, and applications may now be rejected on absolute or relative grounds. There is provision for applications to be opposed, and for priority claims.

However, the new legislation raises a number of issues which need to be resolved on an urgent basis. The new Act repeals an old law, but it does not repeal the correct one. The new Act does not provide for the establishment of a Registrar, or for the payment of official fees. Furthermore, the new law has been enacted without the knowledge of the Vanuatu Financial Services Commission, which currently maintains the Trade Marks Register, and was processing applications under the old Act until a few days ago.

The Financial Services Commission has made it clear that all existing registrations remain valid and in force, but until these issues are resolved, the processing of all pending applications has been put on hold. Further developments will be reported as soon as they are known.

13th July 2011


DPR of Korea (North) - Strict sanctions in force

As you may be aware, the US has for some time imposed strict sanctions on trade with North Korea, and both HM Treasury of Great Britain and the United Nations have similarly imposed such sanctions. A recent development in this regard has made these sanctions even more stringent.

The sanctions have forbidden all transactions with North Korea (including ongoing transactions), which are therefore being rejected or frozen, with the exception of certain transactions relating to food or humanitarian aid, and financial institutions are therefore refusing to process any payments destined for North Korean entities or their beneficiaries. As a result of these sanctions, it is currently impossible to send any payments to North Korea, and consequently, we are unable to pay our North Korean associates for any work which they undertake on our behalf in our clients' intellectual property matters.

By way of background, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the US Department of the Treasury administers and enforces economic and trade sanctions based on US foreign policy and national security goals against targeted foreign countries and regimes, terrorists, international narcotics traffickers, those engaged in activities related to the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and other threats to the national security, foreign policy or economy of the United States. OFAC acts under US Presidential national emergency powers, as well as authority granted by specific legislation, to impose controls on transactions and freeze assets under US jurisdiction. Many of the sanctions are based on United Nations and other international mandates, are multilateral in scope, and involve close cooperation with allied governments.

On 20 June 2011, OFAC amended the North Korea Sanctions Regulations, rendering them more stringent, and as you will appreciate, this development has left us, and other IP practitioners, in the unfortunate predicament that we are powerless to undertake any fee-incurring work in respect of any North Korean matters. We have made extensive enquiries to try and find a solution to this problem, but we have been unable to identify any legal means of paying our North Korean associates at this time.

Under the circumstances, we regret that we are currently unable to accept any new instructions for the filing, processing or renewal of your IP rights. We trust that you will appreciate this difficult situation, which is entirely beyond our control. Further developments will be reported when known.


11th July 2011


BVI - Service Marks once again registrable !

We are pleased to report that submissions made to the Registrar have been successful and that, with effect from 10 June 2011, the registration of service marks via the re-registration of an existing UK registration is again permitted. We are advised that in light of the ongoing review of the Trademark Acts, the policy decision has been made by the Registrar of Corporate Affairs to proceed with the registration and renewals of UK registered service marks.

Please note that service marks will only be registered via the reregistration of an existing United Kingdom trade mark. The filing of local/substantive applications for services is still not possible.

15th June 2011


BVI - Service Marks no longer registrable

We have recently been notified of a change of procedure at the Registry of Corporate Affairs in the British Virgin Islands in that service marks are no longer registrable in the jurisdiction. Previously, protection for services could only be obtained by the re-registration of an existing United Kingdom trade mark. With effect from 12 April 2011 this has no longer been possible. We understand that this change in practice is due to the fact that the Trade Marks Law refers to goods but not to services.

Existing registrations covering service classes are now considered by the Registry to have been registered in error. The Registrar has indicated that renewals for such registrations will not be accepted unless all service classes are deleted.

We recognise that this will cause some considerable inconvenience to trade mark owners and understand that local attorney firms are vigorously making recommendations to the relevant legislative bodies in the BVI with a view to remedying the problem on an expedited basis.

Further developments will be reported.

14th June 2011


Yemen - New Patent Law

We write to advise you that a new Patents, Utility Models, Integrated Circuits and Trade Secrets Law No. 2 of 2011 has recently been published in the country's Official Gazette. The law, which was issued on 12 January 2011 and published on 4 May 2011, entered into force on 12 April 2011.

Points of particular significance regarding patents and utility models in the new law are highlighted below:

Patents
- Absolute (worldwide) novelty is required for an invention to be patentable.
- An employer is entitled to be named as the patentee if an invention is made by employee(s) during the execution of a contract or a commitment for the execution of inventive efforts, or if the employee would not have developed the subject matter of the protection had he not used facilities, means or data that were made available through his employment. The employee has the right to receive a remuneration, which is to be agreed upon with the consent of both parties, or assessed in light of the terms of the contract of employment and the economic importance of the subject matter of the protection. A patent application filed by an employee within one year from the date of termination of employment will be considered as having been submitted during the course of employment
- The opposition period has been reduced from 6 months to 90 days from the date of publication of a patent application.
- Patents are granted for a term of protection of 20 years from the filing date, rather than the 15 year term provided for under the previous law.
- A patent must be worked, and if the patent is not being fully exploited by the patentee within 4 years from the filing date or 3 years from the date of grant, it will be subject to compulsory licensing under the provisions of the law.

Utility Models
- Conversion from and to a patent application is possible.
- The term of protection of a utility model is 7 years from the filing date.

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any further queries in this matter.


1st June 2011


Qatar - Accession to the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

Qatar (QA) became the 143rd PCT Contracting State on 3 May 2011. The PCT will enter into force in Qatar on 3 August 2011, and consequently, Qatar may be designated in any international patent application filed on or after that date. Furthermore, nationals and residents of Qatar may file international patent applications under the Treaty. Qatar may also be elected for the purpose of International Preliminary Examination, as it will be bound by Chapter II of the Treaty.

However, the instrument of accession declares that, pursuant to Article 64(5) of the Patent Cooperation Treaty, Qatar does not consider itself to be bound by the provisions of Article 59 of the Treaty. According to Article 59, any dispute between two or more countries of the Treaty concerning the interpretation or application of the Treaty or its regulations which is not settled by negotiation may, by any of the concerned countries, be brought before the International Court of Justice unless the countries concerned agree on some other method of settlement. Therefore, with regard to any dispute between Qatar and any other country of the Treaty, the provisions of Article 59 shall not apply.

The Qatari authorities must now amend the law of this country in order to introduce provisions for the processing of PCT national phase applications, and the Patent Office must be enhanced in order for such patent applications to be received. It is not yet known when such changes will occur, but we will post any further news once it is forthcoming.

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any further queries in this matter.



1st June 2011


Argentina - Patent Office issue Resolution No. P-339-2010

On 29 December 2010, the Argentinean Patent Office issued Resolution No. P-339-2010 which allows for the following:

1. An Applicant with several patent applications in the same subclass (as per Strasbourg Agreement for the International Classification of Patents) may request the interchange of the chronological order of substantive examination of the said applications.

2. The above interchange can only be made in pairs and may only be made in respect of patent applications:

a) in the same subclass; and
b) that have been published; and
c) where the examination fees have already been paid.

3. This option is available to the Applicant up to 30 April 2011.

4. Upon request by the Applicant, the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) will issue a non-appealable resolution ordering the requested interchange.

The cost of requesting such interchange would be approximately GBP 250.00 per pair of applications. Any instructions to effect such an interchange must clearly state which application is to be examined first and which is to be examined second.

Example (same Applicant & subclass)

  • Application A - examination request filed 11 February 2002
  • Application B - examination request filed 25 June 2002
  • Application C - examination request filed 22 December 2003
  • Application D - examination request filed 04 May 2004

In the normal course of events, the substantive examination order would be A, B, C then D. However, if the Applicant elected to interchange the examination order of application A and D, then the new substantive examination order would be D, B, C then A.

Please do not hesitate to contact us if we can be of any further assistance in respect of this matter.

22nd March 2011


Gambia - Patent Annuities and Working Requirements

As we have previously posted on this website, a new Industrial Property Act (1989) was published in the Gambia on 2 April 2007. However, as the Implementing Regulations were not published at that time, there was a great deal of confusion as to whether the new law was yet in full force and effect.

Inter alia, the new Act specified that patents would be granted for a term of 15 years, extensible by a further five years upon request and upon provision of proof of working of the invention in the Gambia. The new Act also provided that annuities would be payable annually, commencing on the first anniversary of the filing date of a patent application in the Gambia. However, to date, the Registrar has not been accepting any annuities under the new law.

We have just learnt that the Implementing Regulations were finally published in the Gambia on 1 January 2011, and we understand that annuities are therefore now payable as from that date onwards, in respect of all granted patents and pending patent applications. A grace period of 6 months is provided for late payment of annuities, on payment of a late fine.

As far as the extension of the term of a patent is concerned, the Act provided that a patentee can request an extension of the 15 year term of their patent for a further 5 years, by lodging a formal request for extension not more than twelve months and not less than one month before the expiration of the 15-year term. The extension will be granted provided that the patentee pays the prescribed fee and proves to the satisfaction of the Registrar that the invention is being worked sufficiently in the Gambia at the date of the request or that there are other circumstances (other than importation) which justify the failure to work the invention. Annual fees will be payable during the five year extension period, up to the 20th annuity.

The new Act stipulates that an invention is deemed to have been worked if the patented product is made or the patented process if used, as the case may be. It is not yet clear as to the precise type of evidence that will be required in practice in order to demonstrate working satisfactorily, and the law is silent on this point. However, it may be pertinent to note that the Act does contain provisions for the grant of compulsory licences on the grounds of non-working of an invention, and from those provisions it may be assumed that the evidence that must be supplied would be that which is deemed sufficient to prove an adequate supply of the patented product and on reasonable terms to the market in Gambia. We understand that this could take the form of evidence of the marketing, promotion or advertising of the product, sales invoices, evidence of purchases of the product, evidence of suppliers or those who stock the product, and evidence of awareness of the article in the market through surveys, media reports and the like.

We are currently compiling a list of all of our clients' Gambian patent cases, and we will write on each case to advise our clients of the due dates for the payment of annuities and the filing of term extension requests. Please, however, check your own records to ensure that all of your cases are accounted for.


9th March 2011


Malaysia - Expedited examination of patent applications

A new Regulation has recently been introduced in Malaysia, with effect from 15 February 2011, which allows for the expedited examination of Malaysian patent applications. This provision aims to reduce the time taken for the prosecution of patent applications, and to accelerate the allowance and issuance of the Letters Patent. It is therefore particularly useful in cases where there is an alleged infringement and where prompt and rapid action is therefore required in order that rights in the patent may be enforced.

Expedited examination is only available for Paris Convention and/or non-PCT patent applications. The new Regulation, namely Regulation 27E (1) of the Patent (Amendment) Regulations 2011, states that 'An applicant who requests or has requested for substantive examination under regulation 27 may request the Registrar to undertake an expedited examination of the application once it has been made available for public inspection under section 34 of the Act.' Therefore, an applicant may submit a request for approval of expedited examination of their application, along with payment of the prescribed fee, after 18 months from the earliest priority date or filing date of the Malaysian patent application has elapsed.

Applicants who opt for expedited examination will be required to respond to any examination report which issues within three weeks from the date of mailing thereof (normally, applicants are given three months within which to respond). Failure to respond within this three week period will result in the request for expedited examination being withdrawn and the normal examination procedure and its associated timescale will thereafter apply to the case.

If you require any further information in this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us.


2nd March 2011


Argentina - Expediting examination of patent applications

The Argentine Patent Office (INPI) has recently issued Resolution No. P-339, which authorizes applicants to change the chronological order of substantive examination of their patent applications. The Resolution therefore allows applicants to accelerate the substantive examination of those applications which are of greater interest to them. Specifically, applicants are authorized to request the exchange of the chronological order of examination of any two patent applications, provided that (i) they belong to the same person or firm, (ii) they are included in the same subclass of the Strasbourg Agreement Concerning the International Patent Classification, (iii) they have been published, and (iv) their substantive examination fee has been paid.

The term for filing such requests will expire on 30 April 2011, and no provision is made for extending this term. Any requests must be filed by the applicants or their attorneys, along with a Power of Attorney.

Please let us know if we may be of any further assistance in this matter.


11th January 2011


Argentina - Patents - Increase in official fees anticipated

We have just learnt that the official fees for patent matters in Argentina will be increased in the near future, potentially by 100% or even 150% compared with the current fees. The increase is expected to occur some time before March 2011, although no official notification has yet been issued. We will let you know as soon as we have any news in this regard.

13th December 2010


Trade Marks - Trade Mark Opposition Deadline over Christmas

Due to the publication dates of the respective Journals, we have two Opposition deadlines to meet over the week between Christmas and New Year. The deadline for opposing trade marks published in the Nigerian Trade Marks Journal of 29 October will be 29 December 2010, and the deadline for opposing trade marks published in the OAPI Bulletin No. 5/2009 of 30 June will be 30 December 2010.

Our office will close at 12.00pm on Friday 24 December and will reopen in the morning of Wednesday 29 December. To ensure that instructions to oppose marks which have been published in either of these Journals are processed and acted upon before the deadline, we would be grateful if such instructions could be sent to us before close of business on Thursday 23 December. Your cooperation in this matter will be greatly appreciated.

7th December 2010


Yemen - Commencement of prosecution of patent applications

A Ministerial Decree No. 271/2010 issued on 31 October 2010, which will provide for various aspects of patent procedure, and should therefore result in the commencement of prosecution of patent applications which, to date, have been held in abeyance once they have been filed. We therefore understand that examination, publication and grant of patents will shortly commence, and also that annuity payments will now be necessary on our patent cases.

As far as patent examination is concerned, we understand that it will be necessary to provide prior substantive examination results issued by any member state of the Paris Convention or the examination results of the corresponding international application if available; or a copy of a letters patent if issued; or any authenticated report issued by a recognized technical body specialized in the field.

As far as publication is concerned, we understand that accepted applications will be published in the official gazette, that oppositions may be filed within six months from the publication date and that, if no opposition is filed, the letters patent will issue thereafter.

As far as annuities are concerned, we understand that the payment of annuities will now be due as from the filing date, and that a grace period of one month will be allowed within which to pay the annuities late with a penalty for late filing. We understand that the Patent Office will request all patent applicants to settle the accumulated annuities on pending cases as from each subsequent anniversary of the filing date. However, since the official fees have not yet been promulgated, we understand that it is not yet possible to attend to the payment of any due fees.

All further developments in this regard will be reported promptly.


29th November 2010


Argentina - Patents - New regulation on filing divisional applications

As previously reported, the Argentine Patent Office (INPI) issued Regulation No. 147/2010 in July 2010, which restricted the ability of applicants to file divisional applications once the substantive examination procedure has started.

INPI has now issued a further Regulation No. D-198/2010 dated 19 November 2010, which has partially repealed Regulation No. 147/2010 and has thereby amended the process for the filing of divisional patent applications.

Under the new system, it will be possible to file divisional patent applications in the following two scenarios:

(a) upon request from the examiner during the course of the examination process, when there is more than one invention or if the application is complex. In such instances, the examiner will request that the application be divided within 30 days from issuance of the office action; otherwise, the basic application will be deemed to have been abandoned;

(b) voluntarily, at the applicant's request, at any time until a final decision is issued for rejection, grant etc. of the basic application.

As already required under Regulation No. 147, in either scenario, the basic application must be pending, and if there are several successive applications, all of them must be pending.

This new system, in partially repealing Regulation No. 147, therefore reinstates applicants' freedom to file divisional applications at any time, as long as the parent application or succession of applications is still pending.

In practice, this means that in both scenarios listed above, it will be advisable to assess whether more than one divisional application is necessary, as INPI may hold one object to be patentable and reject another. Please therefore bear these provisions in mind during the prosecution of your patent applications in Argentina.



29th November 2010


Honduras - Patent Annuities

As you are no doubt aware, Honduras became a member of the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) on 20 June 2006. Until recently, renewal fees have only been payable in respect of PCT national phase applications in Honduras from the 2nd anniversary of the international filing date onwards. In other words, only payment for the 3rd year of protection of the PCT application onwards has been required.

However, the Honduras Patent Office have recently amended their regulations to reflect that annuity payments are now due from the international filing date onwards, and not from the 2nd anniversary thereof:

EXAMPLE
PCT application filed on:
15 January 2009
Honduras national phase application filed on:
15 July 2010

Previous Regulations
First annuity payable on 2nd anniversary of international filing date:
15 January 2011

New Regulations
Payments for first annuity period (15 Jan 2009 to 15 Jan 2010) and second annuity period (15 Jan 2010 to 15 Jan 2011) payable on entering the national phase.

We have not yet received official notification of the date that these new regulations were enacted, but they are applicable retrospectively to all pending national phase applications. The Registrar of the Honduras Patent Office has stated that all 'back' annuities that are now deemed to be outstanding are now due and payable by 31 December 2010. At present, indications are that no extensions will be granted.

For future national phase applications, and in order to safeguard applicants' rights, we will instruct payment of the first three annuity periods when entering the PCT national phase in Honduras. Therefore, using the above example, we would have instructed payment of the following annuities when filing the national phase application:

1st annuity period (15 Jan 2009 to 15 Jan 2010)
2nd annuity period (15 Jan 2010 to 15 Jan 2011)
3rd annuity period (15 Jan 2011 to 15 Jan 2012)

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions.


12th November 2010


Rwanda - New Intellectual Property Law

Further to our previous articles on this website regarding the new intellectual property law in Rwanda, we write by way of an update to confirm that the new law (Law No. 31/2009 on the Protection of Intellectual Property dated 26 October 2009) is in full effect in Rwanda following its publication on 14 December 2009, and moreover, the official fees have finally now been promulgated by way of Ministerial Order No. 006/2010.

As previously reported, the provisions of particular significance in the new law are as follows:

Patents
- The new law introduces a requirement of absolute novelty. It is therefore no longer possible to file applications for patents of importation under the new law.
- Patent annuities are payable in respect of patent applications filed since the coming into force of the law, on the anniversary of the filing date. Annuities are also payable in respect of existing applications/registrations. We are currently liaising with Registry officials in Rwanda in order to clarify precisely which fees are payable on patent cases, and we will report any news in this regard in a future article on this website.

Trade Marks
- Trade marks filed and registered since the coming into force of the new law are valid for a period of ten years from the date of filing, and may be renewed for successive periods of ten years. In respect of trade marks registered under the old law, renewal fees must be paid within 10 years of the date of entry into force of the new law.

Further details will be posted on this website as soon as we have more information. In the meantime, if you have any questions on any of the above matters, please do not hesitate to contact us.



4th November 2010


Oman - Industrial Design Applications now being accepted

We are pleased to advise that the implementing regulations of the Omani Industrial Design Law No. 67/2008 have finally been promulgated, and the Patent Office is therefore now accepting applications for industrial design protection.

The term of a registered design in Oman is 10 years from the filing date, subject to the payment of a renewal fee after 5 years from the filing date.

If you require any information as to the costs or documentary requirements of Omani design applications, please do not hesitate to contact us.


26th October 2010


Caribbean Netherlands - (former Netherlands Antilles) - Trade mark registrations

As previously reported, the jurisdiction of Netherlands Antilles split into three separate jurisdictions on 10 October 2010. As a result, there are now three separate Trade Mark Offices covering the territory formerly known as the Netherlands Antilles, and existing registrations are being handled as follows.

Curacao

Existing Netherlands Antilles registrations remain in force in Curacao until the next renewal date without requiring re-confirmation. New applications can be filed, and our existing fees for renewals and applications remain in force for Curacao.

St Maarten

Existing Netherlands Antilles registrations remain in force until the next renewal date without requiring re-confirmation. New applications can be filed, but the official fees have yet to be decided.

Caribbean Netherlands - (BES islands: Bonaire, St. Eustatius and Saba)

The smaller islands in the Antilles are now part of the Kingdom of The Netherlands and have been renamed the 'Caribbean Netherlands'. A Caribbean Netherlands Trade Mark Office has been set up, and is administered by the Benelux Trade Mark Office.

Existing Netherlands Antilles registrations need to be reconfirmed at the Caribbean Netherlands Trade Mark Office by 10 October 2011. If any Netherlands Antilles registrations are due for renewal before 10 October 2011, the re-confirmation can be made at the same time, and we propose to re-confirm your clients' registrations in this jurisdiction when they are renewed. There seems to be some debate about whether certified copies of Netherlands Antilles registrations will be required in order to reconfirm them, but this issue is expected to be resolved shortly.

We are still awaiting details of fees for filing renewals, as well as new applications, in the Caribbean Netherlands and in St Maarten. Further information will be posted on our website as soon as it is known.

20th October 2010


Uganda - New Trade Marks Act now in force

The Trade Marks Act 2010 has now been published and is in force, with an effective date of 3 September 2010.

The new law allows service marks to be filed for the first time. The Ninth Edition of the Nice Classification system is being followed, so applications can now be filed in classes 35 to 45. However, multi-class applications are not permitted under the new Act. There is also no mention in the law of claiming priority.

The initial duration of a registration is seven years, calculated from the date of application, and marks are now renewed for a period of ten years, rather than the fourteen year term under the old law.

An unusual feature of the new law is a requirement for applicants to conduct a search. This appears to be compulsory. We are attempting to clarify the matter, as it is unclear whether a search has to be conducted prior to filing the application, or whether a search can be requested at the same time as filing.

Should you have any queries about the new law, please do not hesitate to contact us.


1st October 2010


Peru - New rules for payment of patent annuities

Until recently, renewal fees have been payable in Peru on the third and each subsequent anniversary of the filing date (or, in respect of PCT national phase applications, the third and each subsequent anniversary of the international filing date). However, we have just learnt that, with effect from 20 August 2010, annuities are now payable on the first and each subsequent anniversary of the filing date (or, in respect of PCT national phase applications, the first and each subsequent anniversary of the international filing date).

It is not yet clear whether these new rules affect all pending applications and granted patents in Peru, or only those filed on or after 20 August 2010, nor is it clear whether any back annuities are due in respect of already-filed cases in respect of years already passed. We will let you know as soon as we have any further information in this regard.

Please do not hesitate to contact us should you have any questions in the meantime.


14th September 2010


Ecuador - New rules for payment of patent annuities

Until recently, renewal fees have been payable in Ecuador in respect of PCT national phase applications annually, in advance, on the last day of the month containing the anniversary of the national filing date. However, we have just learnt that, with effect from 1 June 2010, annuities are now payable on the first and each subsequent anniversary of the international filing date.

It is not yet clear whether these new rules affect all PCT national phase cases, or only those filed on or after 1 June 2010, nor is it clear whether any back annuities are due in respect of pending cases in respect of years already passed. However, in order to safeguard the rights of applicants in their Ecuador patents, we would recommend that payments are made in respect of any renewal fees that will fall due imminently by virtue of the above-stated new calculation methods. Failure to pay annuities when due, or within a six-month period of grace thereafter, will lead to lapse of the patent or application.

Further news in this regard will be reported when known.

14th September 2010


Caribbean Netherlands - (former Netherlands Antilles) - Trade mark registrations

The Netherlands Antilles is ceasing to function as one jurisdiction, with Curaçao and St Maarten becoming autonomous countries in their own right. The three smaller islands of Bonaire. St Eustatius and Saba (the BES islands) will become municipalities of The Netherlands. The jurisdictions will formally split on 10 October 2010.

Within 12 months of this date, all existing Netherlands Antilles registrations will have to be confirmed with the Trade Mark Offices of Curaçao and St Maarten if protection is to be maintained in these jurisdictions. In order to maintain protection in the BES islands, Netherlands Antilles registrations will have to be confirmed at the Benelux Trade Mark Office although, curiously, the current 1995 Trade Marks Ordinance will remain in force in the BES islands as well.

To date, St Maarten, the Dutch section of the Caribbean island of St Martin, has been part of The Netherlands, and has been covered by Benelux registrations, CTM registrations, and International Registrations designating Benelux. St Maarten has now been advised by Curaçao to set up a Trade Mark Office of its own, but has declined to say whether it will do so.

Owners of International Registrations designating the Netherlands Antilles will be contacted by WIPO, which will advise them of the re-confirmation procedures to be followed.

It remains to be seen how this will work in practice, and presently there is no indication as to what the fees will be. Further information will be posted as soon as it is available.


10th September 2010


Nigeria - Increase in official fees with effect from 1 September 2010

The official fees for patent, design and trade mark matters in Nigeria are to be increased with effect from 1 September 2010.

In most instances, the new fees will be approximately 100% higher than the current fees. In view of this, we would recommend that you send us any instructions for filing, prosecuting or renewing your IP matters in Nigeria as soon as possible, so that we may take advantage of the current, lower official fees.

We look forward to assisting you in any such work in the near future.


24th August 2010


Dominica - Patent annuities now payable

As you may be aware, a new Patents Act (Act No. 8 of 1999) was promulgated in Dominica on 7 October 1999, and finally became effective upon issuance of the Implementing Regulations on 25 August 2008. Since then, we have been awaiting the acceptance by the Dominica Registry of patent annuity payments. We are pleased to report that the Registrar has finally announced that he will now accept annuity payments.

As usual in jurisdictions such as this, however, it is not absolutely clear which annuities are now payable. The new Patents Act states that annual renewal fees are payable on all pending applications and patents granted under the new and former Acts. The Act requires payment of annual fees in advance 'starting one year after the filing date of the application for the grant of the patent' (Section 28(2)). However, the Registrar has decided that annuities are due as from the date of coming into effect of the new Act, and therefore considers that annuities must be paid in respect of the anniversary of the filing date which fell due in 2008 and each subsequent anniversary thereafter. Hence, for example, an application filed in 2003 would be at its fifth anniversary in 2008. Therefore, annuities would apparently now be payable as follows:-

- for the 5th anniversary of the filing date (2008)
- for the 6th anniversary of the filing date (2009)
- for the 7th anniversary of the filing date (2010).

However, it is not yet clear whether the 'filing date' of PCT national phase applications and reregistration applications is deemed to be, respectively, the PCT filing date and the EP(UK) filing date, or whether it is deemed to be the local filing date in Dominica. It appears to be the latter, i.e. that annuity due dates are to be calculated from the local filing date in Dominica, although this is contrary to the procedure adopted in most other jurisdictions worldwide. Furthermore, it is not yet clear whether anniversaries which occurred in 2008 before the date on which the new law came into force (25 August) will attract annuity fees for that year or not. To be safe, we are proceeding on the assumption that any date falling in 2008 will incur an annuity fee.

The Registrar is allowing a two (2) month grace period within which to pay all outstanding annuities, i.e. until the end of September 2010 , and if these annuities are not duly paid, a patent or patent application will be deemed to have lapsed.

Please let us know if you would like us to attend to the payment of the annuities which are now due on any of your cases. Please ensure that all of your Dominican patent cases are accounted for.

In view of the uncertainties outlined above, it may turn out that other annuities are payable. If this comes to light, and there are any fees due which have not been accounted for herein, we would be grateful for your confirmation upon instructing us to pay any annuities that we should pay all due fees in order to safeguard your patent case(s).

We look forward to hearing from you should you require any assistance in this matter.



4th August 2010


Haiti - Deadline for revalidating foreign granted patents extended

We have just learnt that the deadline for revalidating foreign granted patents in Haiti which, to date, has been one year from the grant date of the foreign patent, has been extended to three years from this grant date. This therefore gives applicants more time to revalidate their foreign patents in Haiti.

Should you require any further information in this regard, please do not hesitate to contact us.


9th July 2010


Argentina - Patents - New restrictions on filing divisional applications

On 7 July 2010, the Argentine Patent Office (INPI) issued Regulation No. 147/2010, which restricts the ability of applicants to file divisional applications once the substantive examination procedure has started. This regulation allows applicants to file divisional applications only until notice of the substantive examination has been served. No divisional applications will be allowed thereafter, unless they are made in response to a request from the Argentine Patent Office. Once the substantive examination procedure has begun, if the examiner finds that the application includes more than one invention, the applicant will be requested to divide the application within 30 days; should the applicant fail to do so, the application will be deemed to have been abandoned. In all cases, the basic application must be alive and pending.

This new regulation modifies the prior practice of the Argentine Patent Office, which allowed applicants to file divisional applications at any time during the prosecution of the application up to the issuance of a final decision in the basic application. Whilst this Regulation raises concerns, as it may unlawfully restrict patent rights (thus providing grounds for potential challenge), please bear it in mind during the prosecution of your patent applications in Argentina.

8th July 2010


Georgia - Amendments to Patent Law, and new Law on Designs

We wish to report that the Patent Law of Georgia has been amended with effect from 24 June 2010. From the same date, a new Law on Designs also became effective. Points of particular significance are detailed below:

Amendments to the Patent Law of Georgia
Patents of Importation no longer permissible: Inter alia, the amendments to the patent law render it no longer possible to file an application for a patent of importation (i.e. one based on a foreign granted patent) in Georgia. Patents of importation granted before 24 June 2010 will, however, remain in force for the remainder of their term (provided, of course, that the necessary annuities are duly paid).

Examination of patent applications: The examination of patent applications involves the verification of the filing date, and an examination as to both form and substance. During the examination as to substance, the subject-matter which is indicated in the patent application and the state of art are both determined. After a request for novelty examination has been completed, the examiner is authorized to evaluate also the inventive step. If the examiner considers that the invention is obvious compared with the existing state of the art, the examiner must notify the heads of examination. The examiner's suggestion on the inventive step will be jointly discussed, on the basis of which a decision on grant of patent will be taken.

Post-grant actions: An interested party may, within the term of validity of a patent, request the re-examination thereof on the basis that the invention does not satisfy the patentability requirements. On the basis of such re-examination, the Patent Office will make a decision either to refuse the request for cancellation of the patent, or to cancel the patent completely or partially. At the request of the patent owner, it is permissible to make amendments to the specification and claims of the issued patent in order to correct technical errors.

The validity of a patent: In general, this term remains unchanged at 20 years from the filing date. However, the validity term of patents relating to medical preparations, for which permission from an authorized authority is necessary in order for the invention to enter the Georgian market, may be extended at the request of patent owner for an additional period which may not exceed 5 further years. The patent owner must present a statement requesting the additional term within a year from the date of receipt of consent from the authorized authority.

Utility Models: The patentability criterion that must be satisfied by utility models are: novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability. The validity term of a utility model is 10 years.

New Law on Designs
A new Law on Designs came into effect on 24 June 2010. Previously, regulations referring to designs were incorporated into the patent law. The new law refers to those designs for which applications are filed after 24 June 2010, whereas applications for designs filed before this date will continue to be treated under the previous regulations.

Design applications can now be filed directly with the Georgian Patent Office (GPO), or an International registration can be extended to Georgia according to the Hague Convention. Registration may be obtained in respect of novel and individual designs. Examination of design applications is carried out for local novelty. The GPO issues a decision on grant and publishes information regarding the design in the Official Bulletin. Third parties may file an opposition after the publication, before the Chamber of Appeal under the GPO. Accelerated registration of designs is possible upon payment of the relevant fees. Design registrations have a term of validity of 5 years from the filing date, extensible for four further 5-year terms upon payment of the relevant fees, up to a maximum of 25 years from the date of filing.


1st July 2010


Saudi Arabia - Exclusive Marketing/Manufacturing Rights

We have recently learnt that a new mechanism for providing and protecting Exclusive Marketing and Manufacturing Rights in respect of certain pharmaceutical products has been implemented in Saudi Arabia. An initiative jointly formulated by the Ministry of Health, King Abdul Aziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), the authority which oversees the Saudi Patent Office, and the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, received the approval of His Majesty the King on 30 September 2009, but this has only just been reported to us.

The mechanism applies to pharmaceutical products for which patent applications had been submitted under the repealed Patent Law issued by Royal Decree No. 38/M of 1989 and were still pending at the time of coming into force of the Law of Patents, Layout Designs of Integrated Circuits, Plant Varieties and Industrial Designs issued by Royal Decree No. 27/M on 17 July 2004. The mechanism allows for the Saudi Food & Drug Authority (SFDA) to provide entities with the exclusive right to market and manufacture in the Kingdom those pharmaceutical products covered by the mechanism. The term of such exclusive marketing and manufacturing rights will expire upon expiry of the corresponding patent in the United States or the European Union, whichever occurs first.

Applications for products covered by the mechanism must meet the following criteria:

1. The application must have been pending at the time that the Law on Patents, Layout Design of Integrated Circuits, Plant Varieties and Industrial Designs came into effect on 6 September 2004.
2. The subject matter to which the product relates must be patentable under the Laws of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
3. A patent must have been issued for the product in the country of origin and/or the United States or European Union.
4. The corresponding patent granted by the United States or European Union must still be in force and not lapsed or expired.

The application for the right of exclusive marketing and manufacturing should be submitted to the General Directorate of Industrial Property at King Abdul Aziz City for Science & Technology (KACST), supported by a certified copy of the corresponding patent granted by the EP or US Patent Office and copies of documents proving that the subject Saudi patent application was submitted under the repealed Patent Law issued by Royal Decree No. 38/M of 1989, was still pending at the time of coming into force of the Law of Patents, Layout Designs of Integrated Circuits, Plant Varieties and Industrial Designs issued by Royal Decree No. 27/M on 17 July 2004, but was then rejected due to lack of the novelty required by the new Saudi Patent Law.

The deadline for filing the application for the right of exclusive marketing and manufacturing is six months of the date of approval by His Majesty the King thus, the deadline for such submissions is 30 March 2010, but we will require your instructions no later than 23 March 2010 should you wish for any such applications to be filed on your behalf.

After checking the application and making sure that the same meets all of the above conditions, the application will be transferred by the KACST to the Saudi Food & Drug Authority for processing.

We look forward to receiving any instructions from you in good time before the above deadline, should you wish to make use of the above provisions.


16th February 2010


Liberia - Accession to ARIPO

On 24 December 2009, the Republic of Liberia deposited an Instrument of Accession to ARIPO, and both the Harare and Banjul Protocols will therefore enter into force in respect of Liberia on 24 March 2010.

Liberia becomes the 17th member State of the Harare Protocol on patents, designs, and utility models, and the 9th member State of the Banjul Protocol on trade marks.

The Banjul Protocol permits the proprietor of a mark to designate a State which becomes a party to the Protocol subsequent to the filing or registration of the mark. However, there is no such provision for the later designation of States in relation to existing patents or patent applications.


28th January 2010


Rwanda - New Intellectual Property Law

Further to our previous article on this website regarding the new intellectual property law in Rwanda, we write by way of an update to advise that the new law (Law No. 31/2009 on the Protection of Intellectual Property dated 26 October 2009) was published on 14 December 2009 and is therefore apparently in force with effect from that date.

However, although the new law has in effect been implemented, the Registry has not yet begun to practice under the provisions thereof, nor have the official fees yet been promulgated. It is anticipated that the law will be brought fully into effect by mid-February 2010.

Further details will be posted on this website as soon as we have more information. In the meantime, if you have any questions on any of the above matters, please do not hesitate to contact us.


26th January 2010


St Vincent & the Grenadines - Patent renewal fees now payable

As you may be aware, the St Vincent and the Grenadines Patent Act 2004 came into force with effect from 4 August 2008, and the corresponding Regulations came into force on 8 July 2009.

Inter alia, the new law introduced the requirement to pay annuities annually in respect of the second and each subsequent year from the filing date of an application. A grace period of six months is provided in the law for the late payment of annuities, upon payment of a 10% surcharge. If the relevant fees are not paid, the patent or application is deemed to have lapsed.

There has been significant confusion over the last few months regarding this requirement to pay annuities, as the Registrar did not issue any guidance as to which fees were due and when they were payable. However, the Registrar has finally announced that he will now accept annuity payments falling due on or after the date of implementation of the new Regulations (8 July 2009), for all patent applications and granted patents. The due dates of these annuities are calculated from the UK filing date for reregistration applications, and from the PCT filing date for PCT national phase applications, and the first fee payable is that which fell/falls due on the next anniversary of that effective filing date occurring after 8 July 2009. No other back fees are payable.

Notwithstanding the above, in view of the fact that the six month grace period has already expired or will shortly expire for any renewal fees falling due on or shortly after 8 July 2009, the Registrar has apparently indicated that no fees will be payable in respect of any renewals falling due in July, August, September or October 2009. Instead, the relevant 2010 fees will the first fees payable in those cases. We have requested a copy of an official notice from the Registry confirming this special dispensation, but it appears that the Registrar is currently out of the island and so no such written confirmation has therefore been forthcoming. We are extremely concerned that, in the absence of any evidence in writing that renewals falling due in July, August, September and October 2009 are not payable, any such patent cases may be vulnerable to attack in the future. We would therefore strongly recommend that we attempt to pay any fees falling within this four-month time frame, so that at least there is evidence on the official file that an attempt to pay the fees was made (even if the fees are refused by the Registrar).

Please check your records to ensure that all of your St. Vincent patent cases are accounted for. Please let us know if you would like us to attend to the payment of any such annuities on your behalf.

21st January 2010


Costa Rica - Deeds of Assignment in patent applications

We have recently learnt that a Circular Letter dated 3 December 2009 was issued by the Costa Rican Patent Office, in which it was stated that a legalised Power with Assignment document is now required with regard to all patent applications filed under the PCT Convention, those filed under the Paris Convention and those filed as national patent applications. However, on checking this requirement, our associate has now indicated that separate Powers (which have only to be notarised) and Assignments (which must be legalised to the level of the Costa Rican Consul) may be filed.

A member of staff at the Costa Rican Patent Office has unofficially informed our associate that it would not be necessary to file an assignment document whenever a Declaration under Rule 4.17 PCT (i.e. whereby Box No. VIII (ii) of the Form PCT/RO/101 is checked and the signature of the inventor/assignor appears in the document) has been filed. However, we would not recommend that we rely on this unofficial information at this time.

We have also received clarification that it is acceptable to file an existing assignment document (e.g. a US assignment), notarised and then legalized by the Costa Rican Consul.

The deadline for submitting the assignment documentation is two months from the filing date in Costa Rica.

Since the issuance of the Circular Letter DRPI-009-2009, the Patent Office has not established if an extension of time would be possible with regard to the filing of the assignment document in respect of PCT applications. Nevertheless, in the case of patent applications under the Paris Convention, the Patent Office has granted such extensions of time. In our associate's opinion, the same criteria would be followed for PCT patent applications.

To date, the Patent Office has not decided whether or not they are going to request assignment documents for all existing applications. We will let our clients know on a case-by-case basis if such documentation is required for any of their existing applications.


22nd December 2009


Guernsey - 'Patents Post Box Service' now available

The Bailiwick of Guernsey, which comprises the islands of Guernsey, Alderney and Sark and the neighbouring islets of Herm and Jethou, has in recent years been undergoing a series of legislative measures in order to transform the Bailiwick into a modern, TRIPs-compliant IP jurisdiction. In 2006, new trade mark, design, copyright and related rights' laws were introduced, and the primary legislation at that time also included authorisation for Guernsey's legislature to pass laws relating to patents and utility models. Finally, in January 2009, Guernsey passed this long-awaited legislation relating to the registration of patents and the protection of biotechnological inventions. However, to date, this 'Registered Patents and Biotechnology Inventions (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Ordinance, 2009' (the 'Patents Ordinance') has yet to be implemented.

It is expected that the Patents Ordinance will finally come into force during the first quarter of 2010, and this Ordinance will repeal the current law which dates back to 1922. Inter alia, the new Patents Ordinance will significantly broaden the number of jurisdictions from which a granted patent may be reregistered in Guernsey (e.g. to include the US, Canada, China and the Russian Federation). Under the present law, only granted UK or European (UK) patents may be reregistered there.

The new Ordinance will allow the registration of any inventions which are new, inventive and capable of industrial applicability, without exception. Thus, technology such as computer programs will not be excluded from patentability, and a US patent relating to such subject matter will therefore be registrable in Guernsey.

The Guernsey Intellectual Property Office (IPO) has just announced that, until such time as the new Patents Ordinance comes into force, it will be possible for applicants to utilize a newly-launched 'Patents Post Box Service'. This is described by the IPO as providing 'exciting new service opportunities for IP holders who have an interest in patent and biotechnological invention and potential registration in the Bailiwick of Guernsey', by enabling applicants to apply directly to the Registrar of Intellectual Property for an advanced filing of a patent application as if the Ordinance were already in force. Once the relevant forms and fees have been submitted along with evidence of the grant of a patent elsewhere, the Registrar will carry out a pre-application examination. The Registrar will then be able comment on the prospect of the invention being accepted for registration in the Bailiwick once the relevant law is enabled, so giving the applicant the opportunity to obtain an initial (non-binding) opinion on the likelihood of registration in the Bailiwick of an application for a patent. This will seemingly permit the rapid handling of the application for registration once the Ordinance is given effect, and the application will be given a filing date on the date of the commencement of the Ordinance.

Should you require any further information in this regard, please do not hesitate to contact us.


4th December 2009


Oman - Term of PCT National Phase Applications

Further to our recent website article regarding the above matter, we are pleased to confirm that the Omani Patent Office has now clarified that the term of PCT national phase cases will be 20 years from the international filing date, and not the national filing date as they had previously stated. This therefore reflects the calculation method used in other PCT States.

16th November 2009


Oman - Annuity Payments on PCT National Phase Applications

We have recently ascertained that the Omani Patent Office has begun to review patent applications, after a long period of inactivity. Following this news, we have learnt that the Patent Office has issued a decision dated 21 October 2009, in which it is stated that yearly renewal fees must now be paid in respect of all patent applications. Previously, annuities were only payable after the grant of a patent.

The Patent Office's official decision requires that annuities must now be paid on the first and each subsequent anniversary of the PCT filing date, in respect of all PCT national phase applications, and all accumulated back fees that are therefore now payable to date should be attended to before 1 April 2010. However, we have also been advised that the official fees for patent matters in Oman will shortly be increased. We therefore recommend that we attend to the payment of all due fees in respect of your patent cases before the end of 2009.

The Patent Office has also decided that the term of PCT national phase cases will be 20 years from the national filing date. As you will appreciate, this calculation method differs from other PCT States, in which the term is invariably calculated as 20 years from the international filing date. We are therefore querying this matter with our associates, and will post further news on our website when we have learnt more.

12th November 2009


Cayman Islands - Increase in Official Fees

We have just been advised by the Cayman Islands Registry that the official fees for intellectual property matters will increase quite significantly from 1 January 2010. The filing fee for a patent application, for instance, will increase from US$182.93 to US$243.91.

In view of the above, we would recommend that you send us any new instructions for filing or renewing your intellectual property applications, or recording any changes to the proprietors' details as soon as possible, so as to benefit from the current fee scale.

We look forward to being of further assistance to you in this or any other jurisdiction.

12th November 2009


Burundi - New Intellectual Property Legislation

We wish to report that a new Industrial Property Law has recently been enacted in Burundi, following its signature by the President of Burundi and publication on 28 July 2009. However, the implementing legislation which is required in order for the new law to be promulgated remains outstanding. The Industrial Property Director of Burundi has therefore decided to continue to apply the former IP legal framework until such time as the implementing regulations have been finalized and put in place. Nevertheless, as the new law repeals all previous IP laws, we are of the opinion that the new law became fully effective upon its signature by the President on 28 July 2009. Furthermore we believe that, even though the Industrial Property Director is continuing to accept patent and trade mark applications under the terms of the old law, the provisions of the new law nevertheless apply thereto.

Under the previous IP law, there was no provision for the renewal of trade marks. Whilst the new law introduces a renewable 10 year term, it is presently unclear as to whether trade marks registered under the old law will also need to be renewed. The new law also introduces a requirement for absolute novelty in respect of patent applications. Therefore, whilst it is likely that applications for patents of importation (i.e. those based on foreign granted patents) will still be accepted by the Director of Industrial Property until such time as the implementing regulations have been promulgated, any such applications filed since 28 July 2009 are of doubtful validity.

We also understand that a new law will shortly be implemented in Rwanda, which will come into force upon its publication and which will broadly correspond with the provisions of the new Burundi law. Similarly therefore, patents of importation will soon no longer be provided for in Rwanda, and we therefore recommend that any revalidation patent applications that you wish to file there are instructed as soon as possible to ensure that no rights are jeopardised.

All further developments will be reported promptly.

10th November 2009


Iran - Patents of Importation no longer acceptable

As reported on our website in April 2009, a new law on Intellectual Property came into force in Iran earlier this year. Whilst the new law included a provision requiring absolute novelty of inventions, the Iranian Intellectual Property Office (IIPO) continued to accept applications for patents of importation based on foreign granted patents. However, the IIPO has now decided that they will not accept any further such applications for patents of importation, and has advised that existing applications for patents of importation will be converted into applications for independent patents and granted as such.

We have asked our Iranian associate for a copy of the official notice as issued by the Iranian Patent Office in this regard, but apparently no such notice exists. This development is simply due to a very recent change in practice by the Iranian Patent Office following the introduction of the new law.

We have been advised that this situation may change again in the future, and indeed our associate is currently in negotiations with the Iranian Intellectual Property Office in this matter. We will therefore monitor the situation closely, and all further developments will be reported promptly on this website.

7th October 2009


Liberia - New Industrial Property Law

We have recently learnt that a new Industrial Property Law has been enacted in Liberia. The law was apparently published on 30 April 2003, but only became available on the WIPO website on 18 March 2009. However, it is apparent that this law is not yet in force, as the date of its entry into force and the date of repeal of the previous law were left blank in the publication and furthermore, no official notice has been issued regarding the implementation of the new law, regulations or prescribed fees.

Notwithstanding the apparent absence of promulgation of the 2003 law, it appears that certain aspects thereof are in fact being observed in practice, as we have recently received some certificates of registration for trade mark cases which indicate a reduced term of 10 years (the previous law granted a term of protection of 15 years for trade marks).

We are in discussion with our Liberian associate regarding this situation, and we will post further details on our website as soon as any news is forthcoming. In the meantime, however, we summarise below some provisions of particular significance in the new law, which provides specifically for the registration of patents, trade marks and designs, for your information:

Patents

  • The new law formally recognises the Paris Convention, of which Liberia has been a member since 27 August 1994.
  • The new law also formally provides for PCT applications (Liberia acceded to the PCT on 27 August 1994) and ARIPO applications designating Liberia. However, to date, Liberia has not become a member of ARIPO.
  • The definition of an invention has been amended and the law now has specific exclusions from patentability, including (a) Discoveries, scientific theories and mathematical methods; (b) Schemes, rules or methods for doing business, performing purely mental acts or playing games; and c) Methods for the treatment of the human or animal body by surgery or therapy, as well as diagnostic methods practiced on the human or animal body - this latter exclusion does not apply to products for use in any of these methods.
  • A requirement for absolute novelty has been introduced (the previous law required only local novelty).
  • Divisional patent applications may now be filed.
  • The new law provides for substantive examination, but this is at the discretion of the Director General.
  • Amendments and/or corrections of patent applications are specifically provided for.
  • The term of patent registration remains at 20 years. Annuities are officially payable on all patent registrations and applications; previously they were levied, in practice, only in respect of PCT cases. The transitional provisions provide that patents granted under the old law will remain in force subject to the payment of annual maintenance fees.
  • Revocation of a patent by any interested person is now possible.


Designs

  • The new law specifically provides for industrial designs previously it was not possible to obtain design protection in Liberia.
  • Absolute novelty is required, and Convention priority may be claimed.
  • The term of protection is 5 years, extendible for two further terms of 5 years.
  • As for patents, ARIPO design applications are provided for, but Liberia's non-membership of ARIPO means that this provision currently has no effect.


Trade Marks

  • Trade marks and service marks continue to be recognised under the new law, but provision is now also made for collective marks and trade names.
  • The new law formally recognises the Paris Convention, of which Liberia has been a member since 27 August 1994, and the International (Nice) Convention..
  • As discussed above, ARIPO trade mark registrations are provided for, but in practice will not be possible until such time as Liberia becomes a member of ARIPO.
  • The new law implicitly recognises the Madrid (international) registration system for trade marks, as it provides that international treaties to which Liberia is a party apply to matters dealt with by this Act and, in case of conflict with provisions of this Act, shall prevail over the latter. Whilst Liberia has been a party to the Madrid Agreement since 1995, and Madrid trade marks have been registrable in Liberia to date, the enforceability of such registrations was doubtful under the previous law.
  • Accepted applications will be published under the new law, and oppositions may be filed by any interested person.
  • The term of registration of a mark is 10 years, and this term is renewable for further consecutive periods of 10 years. Under the previous law, the term of a trade mark registration was 15 years. It is not yet clear as to whether the term of trade marks registered under the previous law will be shortened - the transitional provisions of the new Act state that subsisting registrations "shall remain in force but shall be deemed to have been registered under [the new] Act." We will let you know once this matter has been clarified.
  • The rights conferred by a trade mark registration do not extend under the new law to acts in respect of articles which have been put on the market in Liberia by the registered owner or with his consent.
  • A trade mark registration may be invalidated on various grounds, e.g. if the mark does not satisfy the requirements for registrability or if the mark has not been used for three or more years.


As mentioned above, it appears that the 2003 Act is not fully in force, and we are therefore continuing to make enquiries regarding its promulgation. Further information will be posted on our website as soon we have any news.

This information is correct to the best of our knowledge, but only represents an overview of the new Act. Please let us know if you require any more detailed information.

1st October 2009


OAPI - Reduction in our patent charges

We are very pleased to announce that, with effect from 15 July 2009, our charges for the filing and prosecution of patent applications in the jurisdiction of OAPI have been greatly simplified and reduced.

Our revised scale of fees is available for download from our web-site, via the "client login" option on our navigation sidebar. If you already benefit from a discount on our professional fees, please note that this is not included in the scale available as standard on our web-site, but we would be pleased to send you a discounted version for your records if you require one. If you do not yet benefit from our discounted rates, but wish to find out more about how you can qualify for such a discount, please do not hesitate to contact us.

As you may be aware, we have been filing applications for patents, trade marks and designs at OAPI in association with our Cameroon office, Cabinet Ekeme, for over 30 years. We are one of the leading practitioners in this area and play an active role in encouraging the OAPI Registry to improve its efficiency and provide foreign proprietors with the protection that they require. We have decided that, whilst the structure of the official fees at OAPI for patents is still rather complex and depends largely on the number of pages of the patent specification, the number of claims and the number of priority claims, it will be of significant benefit to our clients to simplify and reduce our own professional fees in this regard. We will therefore, from now on, make a standard professional charge for filing patent applications, notwithstanding the above-mentioned variables. This standardisation will serve to reduce the total cost to our clients of filing new patent applications at OAPI, and will therefore make our prices even more competitive in this jurisdiction.

We very much hope that this move will enable the jurisdiction of OAPI, which offers a centralised registration system for applicants in its sixteen member states, to become a more attractive jurisdiction to our clients when seeking patent protection around the world.

For further information, please contact us by e-mail at admin@lysaght.co.uk.

For clients interested in filing trade mark and/or design applications at OAPI, we would also be pleased to assist you. Again, please contact us by e-mail at admin@lysaght.co.uk for our latest scale of fees.

15th July 2009


Uganda - Service Marks and Nice Classification - UPDATE

Having issued a directive last week stating that the Ninth Edition of the Nice Classification is now fully operative in Uganda, including service classes, the Registry has issued a "clarification" of its previous statement.

The Ninth Edition will enter into force in Uganda when the Trade Marks Bill which is currently before Parliament has been passed, and a new Trade Marks Law enters into effect. So, regrettably, service marks cannot be registered as yet, although as indicated in our earlier posting, the law would have to be changed in order to give validity to such an announcement.

Further details of the new law and when it is expected to enter into force will be posted on our website as soon as this information is available.

17th June 2009


Egypt - Terms and annuities for PCT National Phase Applications

We have, for some time, been aware of an amendment which was alleged to have been made to the calculation of the term of protection and payment of annuities in respect of PCT national phase patent applications in Egypt. We have been monitoring this matter closely, because we had received advice from our Egyptian associate that no official notification to this effect had been issued by the relevant minister of the Egyptian government, and that any advice which we had received to the contrary from other agents in Egypt was therefore incorrect.

On 6 June 2009, an Administrative Circular No. 1/2009 was finally issued by the Egyptian Patent Office regarding the above amendments. However, once again, we were advised by our associates in Egypt that this notification was not effective and that the Patent Office was refusing to recognise or apply the contents of the circular, because changes of this sort can only be made by a ministerial decree. Our associates met with the Director of the Egyptian Patent Office to discuss this matter, and finally, on 15 June 2009, an amended Administrative Circular was issued which has been accepted by the Egyptian Patent Office.

The circular (which retains its date of 6 June 2009) states that both the term of a PCT-derived patent and the deadline for paying annuities thereon will now be calculated from the international filing date instead of the local filing date, and that back renewal fees are therefore now payable retroactively in respect of both pending patent applications and granted patents within 6 months of the issuance of the decision, i.e. before 6 December 2009. Examples showing how the new calculations are to be made are set out below for your convenience.

For new PCT national phase applications filed from now on in Egypt, the annuities that fell due on the first anniversary of the international filing date will normally be payable upon entry into the PCT national phase in Egypt. If priority is not claimed in the PCT application, the annuities which were due on the first anniversary and the second anniversary of the international filing date will normally be payable.

e.g. 1. International filing date = 3 January 2008;
Earliest priority date = 5 January 2007;
National phase deadline = 30 months from 5 January 2007 = 5 July 2009;
Annuity payable upon entry into national phase = that which fell due on 3 January 2009 (second annuity). Third annuity due on 3 January 2010.

2. International filing date = 3 January 2007;
No priority claimed;
National phase deadline = 30 months from 3 January 2007 = 3 July 2009;
Annuities payable upon entry into national phase = those which fell due on 3 January 2008 (second annuity) and 3 January 2009 (third annuity). Fourth annuity due on 3 January 2010.

For already-pending applications and granted patents with filing dates prior to 6 June 2009, the annuities which fell due on the first and each subsequent anniversary of the international filing date that have already passed will be payable as an accumulated retroactive annuity before 6 December 2009. However, any annuities which have already been paid under the old system (i.e. calculated from the local filing date) are taken into account and cancel out the equivalent renewals due under the new system, as shown in the below example:

3. International filing date = 14 February 2005;
Local filing date = 10 August 2006;
Under new system, annuities payable = those which were due on 14 February 2006 (second annuity), 14 February 2007 (third annuity), 14 February 2008 (fourth annuity) and 14 February 2009 (fifth annuity).
However, under old system, annuities already paid = those which were due on 10 August 2007 (second annuity) and 10 August 2008 (third annuity).
Therefore, annuities payable before 6 December 2009 (end of grace period set by Administrative Circular No. 1/2009) = fourth and fifth only (because second and third already paid under old system).
Sixth annuity then due 14 February 2010.

As far as already-issued Letters Patents are concerned, we understand that the Patent Office will issue an official letter stating that the term of all national phase patents deriving from PCT applications with international filing dates on or after 6 September 2003 (the date on which Egypt joined the PCT) will be 20 years from the international filing date. Thus, there will be no need to have each Letters Patent corrected to reflect the new term.

Should you have any queries in this regard, please do not hesitate to contact us.

17th June 2009


Uganda - Registration of Service Marks and Nice Classification - Ninth Edition

Uganda has adopted the Ninth Edition of the Nice Classification, as of 9 June 2009.

This means that for the first time, trade marks can now be registered in respect of services in classes 35 - 45. The legality of this change in practice is, in our view, open to doubt as the change in practice has not been accompanied by a change in the law. Nevertheless, as the Registry is now accepting service marks in practice, we recommend that the proprietors of service marks should now file applications to secure their rights in Uganda as soon as possible.

12th June 2009


Djibouti - New Industrial Property Legislation

A new Industrial Property Law No. 050/AN/09 was adopted by the Djibouti Parliament on 27th April 2009 and will come into force 6 months from publication of the enforcing Decree.

A law was also passed for the establishment of a new Industrial Property Office which will be known as "OFFICE DJIBOUTIEN DE LA PROPRIETE INDUSTRIELLE ET COMMERCIALE (ODPIC)".

Further updates will be posted as they arise.

8th May 2009


Iran - Implementation of New law on Intellectual Property

As you may be aware, the Iranian Parliament approved a new law on Intellectual Property in 2008, which was published in the Official Gazette on 20 April 2008. The Iranian Industrial Property Office (IIPO) had one year from that date within which to implement the accompanying regulations. We now write to confirm that the IIPO has prepared the relevant regulations and, following their recent publication in the Official Gazette, the new law is now in force.

A summary of the main provisions of the new law is provided below:

  1. The IIPO has increased all of the official fees, in some cases by nearly 10,000%.
  2. The IIPO has introduced penalty payments for the late renewal of trade marks, patents and industrial designs, the amount being 50% of the relevant official fee.
  3. The filing formalities must be completed within 60 days from the date of notification by the IIPO, although an additional 60 days may be obtained upon the approval of the IIPO.
  4. Annuity payments may be made up to two months prior to the anniversary of the filing date of a patent application, although a six month grace period is allowed after the expiration of the anniversary date upon payment of a surcharge.
  5. Renewal of a trade mark is possible up to one year prior to the expiration date, although a six month grace period is allowed after the expiration date upon payment of a surcharge.
  6. Renewal of industrial designs is possible up to six months prior to the expiration date, although a six month grace period is allowed after the expiration date upon payment of a surcharge.
  7. In the case of administrative oppositions with no prior IP registration in Iran, the plaintiff must file a new trade mark, patent or industrial design application simultaneously with its opposition.
  8. The IIPO will impose an official fee for filing administrative oppositions.
  9. In the case of an administrative opposition or a rejection of an IP application by the IIPO, a committee at the IIPO will make an initial decision, and the applicant must present its case before that committee. A verdict issued by the committee is challengeable before the First Instance Court of Tehran and also the Appeal court.
  10. The IIPO will require all pages relating to a patent application to be translated into Farsi, although it appears that a translation of only summary of the application is possible.
  11. The IIPO will introduce a separate fee for Madrid trade mark applications.


We will keep you apprised of any further information that we can ascertain regarding the new law in due course. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any further questions.

1st April 2009


Chile - The 140th PCT Contracting State

Chile became the 140th PCT Contracting State on 2 March 2009. The PCT will enter into force in Chile on 2 June 2009.

10th March 2009


Peru - The 141st PCT Contracting State

Peru became the 141st PCT Contracting State on 6 March 2009. The PCT will enter into force in Peru on 6 June 2009.

10th March 2009


Guernsey - New Patent Legislation

New legislation was passed in Guernsey on 28 January 2009, which extends the scope of protection that will be available to patent applicants in this jurisdiction.

The new law, The Registered Patents and Biotechnological Inventions Ordinance (Patents Ordinance) is expected to come into force later in 2009. It repeals the current long-established patent law, and provides for the reregistration of any foreign granted patent. Under the previous law, only UK or European (UK) patents could be reregistered. This development means that it will soon be possible to register new types of patents in Guernsey, such as business methods, which have not previously been available for registration there.

If you have any questions on this matters, please do not hesitate to contact us.

25th February 2009


Bahrain - New Patent Law and Implementing Regulations

We have just learnt that the Bahraini Patent Office has finally started to accept the payment of patent annuities, for the first time in this jurisdiction. As we have previously reported, the Implementing Regulations for the new patent law in Bahrain came into force on 10 May 2006, and whilst the requirement for the payment of annuities was introduced as of that date, the Bahraini Patent Office has not been accepting any annuity payments until now.

In view of this new development, annuities are therefore now payable annually, for the remainder of the patent term of 20 years from the filing date of all granted patents (including those granted before the promulgation of the new law and which are still valid), starting from the fee which fell due in 2006. The back annuities must be paid in respect of each patent within six months of the date of receipt of the official notification in this regard, i.e. before the non-extendible deadline of 22 June 2009. Failure to pay these back fees, or indeed any future annuities, will result in the lapse of the patent.

As mentioned above, annuities are payable with effect from 2006, and annually thereafter, based on each anniversary of the grant date of the patent from 2006 onwards. For instance, for a patent granted on 28 October 1996, annuities are payable in respect of 2006 (the 11th annuity), 2007 (the 12th annuity), and 2008 (the 13th annuity). All of these back annuities are payable before 22 June 2009. In this example, the fee for 2009 (the 14th annuity) must then be paid before 28 October 2009, or within a six month grace period thereafter along with a late fine, and annually thereafter.

Please let us know if you have any queries in this matter.

10th February 2009


Gambia - Registrar refusing apps for reregistration of granted EP/UK Patents

As you may remember, we previously warned you of the possibility that our recent applications for the reregistration of granted UK or EP(UK) patents in Gambia would not be valid, by virtue of the publication of the new Industrial Property Act (which introduces a requirement of absolute novelty, and so precludes the filing of such reregistration applications), although it appeared that the Registrar was still accepting such applications.

We regret to advise that the Registrar has now decided to refuse and return the reregistration applications which we have recently filed, and will not accept any further such applications. We are somewhat surprised by this development, as the Registrar has, until now, indicated that these applications were still permissible under the discretionary transitional provisions of the new law.

We therefore regret that we will be unable to proceed further with such applications in the future.

3rd February 2009


Dominica - New Trade Marks Act in Force

A new Act entitled the "Marks, Collective Marks and Trade Names Act of 1999" came into force in Dominica on 01 February 2009. This new Act abolishes the dual system of local applications, and those based on existing UK marks. The final deadline by which granted UK marks can be registered in Dominica will expire on 01 February 2010 - one year from the date of entry into force of the new law.

U.K. based applications

The transitional provisions of the new Act provide that any person who, on the coming into force of the new Act (01 February 2009), is the owner of a trade mark registered, or applied for, in the United Kingdom may, within 12 months of the entry into force of the new Act, file an application for registration of the same trade mark under the new Act. Any such applications will be accorded the filing date or priority date accorded to the application or registration in the United Kingdom.

Local/Substantive applications under the new Act

Previous Acts are repealed, however existing registrations shall remain in force for the unexpired portion of their existing term and may be renewed under the provisions of the new Act.

Some points of particular significance are as follows :-

  • The new law reduces the initial validity period from 14 years to 10 years, calculated from the date of application. Subsequent renewals will also be granted for consecutive periods of 10 years.
  • The IP Officer and the Registry has advised that all pending UK and non-UK based applications that were filed under the old Act (prior to 01 February 2009) but published and/or registered on or after 01 February 2009 are considered to have been granted under the new Act and will be granted for an initial validity period of 10 years from the application date.
  • It is now possible to claim Paris Convention priority.
  • The International Classification of Goods and Services (9th Edition) has been adopted. The filing of multi-class applications is permitted.
  • Existing national registrations must be re-classified upon renewal.
  • Non-use of a mark for any continuous period of three (3) years following registration renders it vulnerable to cancellation on the grounds of non-use.
  • A Trade Mark License Agreement must be recorded to the effective against third parties.
  • License Agreement must provide for quality control, by the licensor, of the quality of the goods or services. Where a license agreement does not provide for such quality control, or if quality control is not effectively carried out, the license agreement will be considered invalid.
  • Collective marks can be registered. A copy of the regulations governing the use of the collective mark must accompany the application.
  • A Collective Mark may not be the subject of a License Agreement.


Please do not hesitate to contact us if you require any further information.

2nd February 2009


Djibouti - New Industrial Property Legislation

We are pleased to report that a new bill for the protection of industrial property was adopted on 27 January 2009 by the Council of Ministers. The legislation now awaits the approval of the House of Representatives, which we expect to take place within the next six months. Once enacted, the new law will come into force six months after its publication in the Official Journal.

The new law provides for the official filing of applications for patents, integrated circuit diagrams, industrial designs and models, trade marks for products and services, commercial names, geographical indications and names of origin, as well as for the control of unfair competition.

The implementation of the new law is subject to the establishment of the Djibouti Office of Industrial and Commercial Property, and to the Regulations being put in place. It may therefore be some time before the new law finally becomes effective. We will monitor this situation closely and will provide updates as soon as we have further news.

30th January 2009


Dominica - New Patent Act finally in force - UPDATE

We have just ascertained that, frustratingly, and contrary to previous advice which we received from our associate in Dominica, the final deadline by which granted UK or European(UK) patents can be registered in Dominica will expire on 25 August 2009, and not 1 February 2009. We have only just received a copy of the new Patents Act and Regulations from our associate, and we noticed upon studying this law that a transitional period of one year from the date of entry into force of the new law was provided for this purpose. Thus, as the new law came into force on 25 August 2008, we immediately queried with our associate as to why we had been advised that the final date for filing reregistration applications would expire on 1 February 2009. In response, we have just been notified that this date was indeed wrongly reported by our associates, and that such applications can be validly filed before 25 August 2009.

We apologize for any inconvenience caused by our associate's miscommunication of the deadline, and would ask that you kindly send us your instructions for the reregistration of any granted UK or EP(UK) patents in Dominica in good time before 25 August 2009 so as to ensure that we may file them before the expiry of this final deadline.

20th January 2009


Vanuatu - Amendments to Trade Marks and Patents Acts

We have recently been advised by the Vanuatu Financial Services Commission that re-registration on the basis of an existing Community Trade Mark or an International Registration is not possible. This is despite the fact that the new trade mark laws clearly indicate that "If a person is a registered proprietor of a trade mark in a (EU) Member State; or by virtue of an entry in the Register of Trade Marks kept under the laws of the Member State or in accordance with the terms of a treaty; convention, arrangement or agreement to which the member State is a party the person may apply to have the trade mark registered in Vanuatu".

We are taking the matter up with the Vanuatu Financial Services Commission as it would appear that the Commission does not understand the terms of its own law. However, for the forseeable future, applications in Vanuatu can only be based on national registrations in EU member states.

In the meantime, if you have any question on the above, please do not hesitate to contact us.

20th January 2009


Dominica - New Patent Act finally in force

We have just ascertained that the new Patents Act (Act No. 8 of 1999), which was promulgated in Dominica on 7 October 1999, finally became effective upon issuance of the Implementing Regulations on 25 August 2008.

We summarise below the provisions of particular significance in the new Patents Act, which will now be in effect in Dominica:

Reregistration of granted UK patents
* As the new Act, inter alia, introduces a requirement of absolute novelty (with certain standard exceptions), and the previous Patents Act and the Registration of United Kingdom Patents Act have been repealed, it will no longer possible to reregister granted UK or European(UK) patents in Dominica. However, a final transitional period has been provided for by the Registry, within which it is still possible to file such applications, and which will expire on 1 February 2009. We therefore ask that you kindly send us any reregistration applications as a matter of urgency, so that we may file them before the expiry of this final deadline.

PCT national phase applications
* Since Dominica is bound by the Patent Co-operation Treaty (PCT), the coming into force of the new Act allows for the processing of PCT national phase patent applications.

Renewal fees
* We believe that annual renewal fees may now be payable in respect of all patents granted under the former Acts (including reregistration patents), as well as in respect of all pending and new applications. The Act states that renewal fees are payable annually in advance starting one year after the filing date of the application for the grant of the patent (Section 28(2)). We are currently investigating with our agent whether renewal fees will in fact become payable on all patents and patent applications, and if so, on what dates they will be payable. Whilst we will endeavour to write to you regarding each of your cases for which renewal fees are payable, please refer to the updates which will be posted on our website (www.lysaght.co.uk) for further information in this regard.

17th December 2008


Dominica - New Trade Marks Act

The Trade Marks Law of Dominica currently provides either for the registration of granted UK Marks or for applications for registration of local (substantive) applications.

We have recently learnt that a new Act, called "Marks, Collective Marks and Trade Names Act of 1999" will come into operation on 01 February 2009. We understand that under this new Act abolishes the dual system of local applications, and applications based on existing UK marks. It will no longer be possible to base an application in Dominica on an existing UK registration, however, the new Act adopts the International Classification (currently the pre-1938 Classification of Goods applies to all substantive applications), and allows for the registration of service marks.

We have requested a copy of the new law from the Dominican Trade Marks Office and we will report more fully on the main implications of the new law once we have received and reviewed it. In the meantime, if you have any question on the above, please do not hesitate to contact us.

10th December 2008


Zanzibar - New Intellectual Property Law

We understand that the new Industrial Property Act 2008 was passed by the parliament in Zanzibar on 31 March 2008. The new law was supposed to have become operational as of 13 September 2008 but, due to delays in the publication of the Commencement Notice in the Gazette and the lack of implementing Regulations and Fees, the effective date of the new law is not yet known.

Some points of particular significance are as follows: -

Trade Marks
* The new law allows registration in respect of trade marks, service marks, collective marks, certification marks and trade names.
* The initial validity term for trade marks will be reduced from 14 years to 10 years, calculated from the filing date of the application for registration. Subsequent renewals will be for consecutive periods of 7 years.
* A six month grace period for late payment of renewal fees is available upon payment of additional fees.
* There is no facility for restoration of lapsed trade marks.
* A claim to the priority of one or more earlier applications may be made under the Paris Convention.
* Non-use of a mark for a continuous period of 3 years from registration will render it open to an action for cancellation by third parties.

Patents
* An invention must now satisfy the requirements of absolute novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability, and it must not relate to 'excluded' subject matter.
* A requirement of absolute novelty of inventions is specified in the new law. Thus, the new law does not provide for the filing of applications for reregistration of granted UK or European(UK) patents in Zanzibar. The new Act does not include transitional provisions setting a period of 12 months during which proprietors of UK or European(UK) patents may still apply for the reregistration of their patents, as have been provided in analogous new laws of this kind elsewhere in the world. We are querying this omission, and we will advise further once we have established whether there is any window within which applicants may still reregister their granted patents in Zanzibar once the new law comes into force.
* A claim to the priority of one or more earlier applications may be made under the Paris Convention.
* The new law specifies that a patent will be granted for a term of 20 years from the filing date.
* Annuities will be payable annually, commencing on the first anniversary of the filing date of a patent application. A grace period of six months is provided for the late payment of annuities, along with a surcharge. Whilst it appears that annuities will be payable annually in respect of both UK-based reregistration patents and local independent patents, it is not yet clear whether back annuities will be payable in respect of existing cases, or indeed how existing cases will be treated under these new provisions. We are still awaiting clarification in this regard.

Utility Models
* The revised Act provides for the grant of utility model certificates in Zanzibar.

Designs
* Industrial designs may be registered in Zanzibar if they are new and are not contrary to public order or morality.
* Registered designs will have a term of 5 years from the filing date, renewable for two further consecutive periods of five years. A three month grace period is provided for the late payment of renewal fees, along with a surcharge.

We understand that a similar Act has been drafted for Tanganyika but has not yet been passed. There are currently no plans for a consolidated law covering the whole of Tanzania.

Further details will be posted on this website as soon as we have more information. In the meantime, if you have any questions on any of the above matters, please do not hesitate to contact us.

10th December 2008


Montenegro - Update

The IP Office of Montenegro has published a draft Regulation stated that the deadline for re-filing pending Serbian cases will be extended from 28 November 2008 to 28 May 2009.

Furthermore, we understand that International Registrations designating Serbia, and filed between 3 June 2006 and 4 December 2006, will be automatically extended to Montenegro, provided that the Serbian authorities have confirmed that the International Registration is in force in Serbia.

Please note that these amendments are not yet officially confirmed and published. Further information will be published on our website as soon as it has been received.

21st October 2008


Kosovo - Update

Further to our previous updates on Kosovo, we have now been informed that the deadline for revalidating existing Yugoslavian or Serbia and Montenegrin registrations in Kosovo has been extended from 1 October 2008 to 19 November 2008.

We invite any clients interested in obtaining such rights in Kosovo, to send us their instructions at their earliest convenience.

30th September 2008


Vanuatu - Amendments to Trade Marks and Patents Acts

Until recently, trade mark applications in Vanuatu could only be filed if based upon existing national UK rights and, whilst patent applications based on European patents which designated the UK have been accepted by the Registry to date, there was no explicit basis for this in the law.

We have recently learnt that new patent and trade mark laws entered into force in Vanuatu on 7 July 2008. The new legislation does not establish any substantive laws, but the Acts extend the explicit bases upon which a patent or trade mark application in Vanuatu can be filed.

Under the new legislation, it is definitively stated that patent and trade mark applications can be based upon existing rights in any member state of the European Union. Not only does this include national rights within EU member states, but also rights obtained under any treaties to which an EU member state may be a party. So, trade mark applications in Vanuatu can also be based upon Community Trade Marks and International Registrations in force anywhere in the EU, and we believe that patent applications can be based upon European patents in force anywhere in the EU.

Additionally, the new Trade Marks law allows registration in respect of service marks, which was previously prohibited by the law, even if the applicant had a registration in service classes in the UK.

15th September 2008


St. Vincent and the Grenadines - Patent reregistrations no longer possible

We have just learnt that the St Vincent and the Grenadines Patent Act 2004 has come into force with effect from 4 August 2008, and from this date, the Registry is no longer accepting patent applications for the reregistration of granted UK or European (UK) patents.

Further news will be reported in respect of this matter once the new patent regulations have been published.

22nd August 2008


Rwanda - New Intellectual Property Law

We understand that the new Rwandan Intellectual Property law has finally been passed by the Parliament, and we believe that it may come into force by the end of this year. The draft law provides that it enters into force on the day of its publication in the Official Gazette.

We have requested a copy of the new law from the Rwandan Ministry of Trade and Industry, and we will report more fully on the main implications of the new law once we have received and reviewed it. However, we set out below some points of particular significance which were present in the draft law and which are presumably also present in the new law:

Patents
The new law introduces a requirement of absolute novelty. It will therefore no longer be possible to file patents of importation under the new law.
Patent annuities will be payable on existing applications/registrations. It is not clear whether back annuities will be payable.

Trade Marks
In respect of existing trade marks, there are no "maintenance in vigour" provisions. However, the draft law requires renewal fees to be paid within 10 years of the date of entry into force of the new law.

Further details will be posted on this website as soon as we have more information. In the meantime, if you have any questions on any of the above matters, please do not hesitate to contact us.

29th July 2008


Cambodia - Patent Applications may now be filed

We have just learnt that it has finally become possible to file patent applications in Cambodia, after many years of inactivity in this jurisdiction.

Patent applications may therefore now be filed by a national or resident of a member of the Paris Convention or WTO, or a national or resident of Cambodia. Applications may contain a claim to the priority of one or more earlier national applications filed in a member of the Paris Convention or WTO.

Should you require any further information on the documentary requirements or costs involved, please do not hesitate to contact us.

1st July 2008


Sao Tome & Principe - Accession to the PCT

With effect from 3 April 2008, Sao Tome & Principe became the 139th country to accede to the PCT at WIPO. The PCT will enter into force in Sao Tome & Principe with effect from 3 July 2008, and will be automatically designated in each PCT application that is filed from this date on.

Please note that, whilst Sao Tome & Principe will be bound by the PCT from this date, we understand that it has not yet amended its patent law in order to permit the processing of national phase applications. It is likely therefore that such national phase applications, once filed, will remain dormant until such time as the law has been amended and the Patent Office has issued guidelines for the processing of PCT applications.

24th June 2008


OAPI - Accession to the Hague Agreement

The African Intellectual Property Organization (OAPI) acceded to the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs on 16 June 2008, and its accession will become effective as from 16 September 2008.

The Hague System now has a total number of 49 contracting parties covering 70 states, and the Geneva Act has effect in 27 of these contracting parties covering 61 states.

20th June 2008


Kosovo - Update

Further to our previous updates on Kosovo, we have now been informed that the deadline for revalidating existing Yugoslavian or Serbia and Montenegrin registrations in Kosovo is definitely 1 October 2008.

We invite any clients interested in obtaining such rights in Kosovo, to send us their instructions at their earliest convenience.

16th June 2008


Montenegro - Intellectual Property Office has now opened

The IP Office in Montenegro opened on 28 May 2008, and is now operational and accepting new applications.

It will not be necessary to file for revalidation of any Serbian registrations that were registered prior to 28 May 2008, as these will automatically be valid in Montenegro until their next renewal date. However any changes to be recorded, or maintenance of these rights, will need to be effected separately in both Serbia and Montenegro.

Regarding Serbian applications that were still pending as at the cut off date of 28 May 2008, these will need to be applied for and examined in Montenegro. A copy of the Serbian application as filed will need to be submitted as evidence with the application in Montenegro, whereupon the Montenegrin application will be afforded the Serbian application/priority date.

To file a new national application we will require a Power of Attorney to be simply signed by an authorised signatory of the applicant company.

If you require a re-application of a pending Serbian application to be filed in Montenegro, we will need to have a copy of the Serbian application to evidence the filing date. Our associates can obtain this directly from Serbia, but we will of course need you to provide us with the Serbian application number.

28th May 2008


Montenegro - Opening of the Intellectual Property Office - 28 May 2008

The Intellectual Property Office of Montenegro will be inaugurated on 28 May 2008, and is supposed to become operational between 29 May 2008 and 2 June 2008.

Validity of Registered Serbian National IP Rights:

All national Intellectual Property rights registered in Serbia prior to the inauguration of the Montenegro IP Office will automatically be valid in Montenegro. Although it is probable that the Montenegro IP Office will require IP holders to submit written proof of validity of their rights in Serbia on the date of inauguration of the Montenegro IP Office, there will be no formal need for a full revalidation procedure. We should have the details of the procedure involved once the IP Office of Montenegro is inaugurated.

Validity of Pending Serbian National IP Rights:

National Intellectual Property rights applied for in Serbia, which have not been registered prior to the inauguration of Montenegro IP Office, will have to be re-applied for in Montenegro within a period of six months in order to maintain the Serbian priority date. Subsequently, these rights will be examined and registered locally in Montenegro.

9th May 2008


Vanuatu - Revisions to Trade Marks Act

We have been advised by the Vanuatu authorities that a new Bill amending the existing Trade Marks Law has been passed by Parliament and will be brought into force shortly.

Currently, the Vanuatu law only allows for the re-registration of existing national UK registrations. At the moment, we have no details of what changes might be brought about by the new Bill, but we will publish further information as and when it is received.

24th April 2008


Kosovo - Update

We refer to our earlier articles regarding the inauguration of the Kosovan Intellectual Property Office.

Contrary to previous indications that the deadline for revalidating existing Yugoslavian or Serbia and Montenegrin registrations in Kosovo is 1 October 2008, we have ascertained that this deadline may well prove to be earlier. We are awaiting further news in this respect, once the Kosovan IP Office has issued a notice setting the final deadline. In the meantime, we would recommend that you send us any instructions in this regard by 1 September 2008 at the latest, to ensure that no rights are prejudiced.

Please also note that, in order to revalidate granted Yugoslavian or Serbia and Montenegrin patent registrations in Kosovo, the Kosovan Patent Office will require a certified copy of a Certificate of Validity from the Serbian Patent Office. Whilst we would be pleased to obtain this document on your behalf, we would point out that it may take some weeks for the Serbian Patent Office to issue these Certificates once requested, and we have ascertained that simple copies will not be accepted by the Kosovan authorities. Please therefore ensure that you instruct us in relation to any of your cases as soon as possible, to ensure that we can obtain the necessary Certificate of Validity and submit this to the Kosovan Patent Office in good time before the deadline (which, as mentioned above, may be as early as September 2008).

We will report all further news in this matter promptly.

11th April 2008


OAPI - Extension of rights to new territories

We wish to draw your attention to an important change in OAPI practice regarding the extension of rights to new territories.

An OAPI registration covers those territories that are members of OAPI at the time of registration. Following the introduction of the Extension Regulation on 4 December 1998, it became possible to extend rights to territories that join OAPI subsequently, by filing an application for extension.

On 1 January 2008 the Extension Regulation was amended to introduce the concept of automatic extension on renewal. The intention of the amendment is to confirm that all trade marks renewed after 4 December 1998 extend automatically to the countries that are members of OAPI at the time of renewal, effective from the date of renewal.

As a consequence of this amendment, OAPI is now rejecting applications for extension to territories which it considers are already protected as a result of a prior renewal. However, it still remains possible to apply for extension of rights to a new country at any time before the renewal of the OAPI right.

Although this new interpretation of the law is a practical and cost-effective solution to the extension of rights to new OAPI countries, we are concerned that this regulatory amendment may be open to challenge for being in conflict with the law, which requires an extension application to be filed in order to extend existing OAPI registrations to new jurisdictions, and makes no mention of automatic extension on renewal.

A second issue is the wording of the amendment itself. The amendment is intended to take retroactive effect and apply to all renewals filed since the Extension Regulation came into effect on 4 December 1998. However, this is not clear from the wording of the amendment, which on strict interpretation implies that only renewals filed after 1 January 2008 extend automatically to all the OAPI states.

We have discussed our concerns with OAPI, who have maintained their position. In OAPIs view the Extension Regulation and its subsequent amendment does not conflict with the law, but serves to clarify a matter over which the law itself silent. The fact that the law provides for the filing of extension applications does not preclude automatic extension on renewal, but gives IP owners the option of applying for extension of rights if they wish, before renewal takes place.

In conclusion, although we have reservations about the legal basis for this new application of the law, we believe that in practice it is most unlikely that a court would fail to support OAPIs change in procedure. Furthermore, OAPI have confirmed that the Bangui Accord is due to be revised in the next two years and that any inconsistencies will then be rectified.

27th March 2008


Gambia - Implementation of Industrial Property Act 1989

The Industrial Property Act 1989 entered into force in Gambia on 2 April 2007. The new act repeals the 1916 Act and introduces the International Classification of Goods and Services.

Despite the effective date of 2 April 2007, the relevant Regulations have yet to enter into force, but in a communication issued on 25 March 2008, the Registrar states that applications will be accepted in the international classes with immediate effect. Applications following the former classification will be accepted up to 2 April 2008; thereafter, they will be refused unless filed in international classes.

We are also advised that all applications received from 2 April 2007 will be reclassified into the International Classification by the Registrar, although at present it is unclear what the process for reclassification will be. We understand that the Registrar has decided that she will reclassify existing applications, rather than the agents who filed the applications. Given the staff shortages at the Registry, and the speed at which matters are normally handled in Gambia, we are not at all optimistic that the reclassification of existing cases will take place in the foreseeable future. Furthermore, we are not convinced that the Registrar will reclassify the applications correctly, and it is presently not known whether we will be able to appeal against any reclassifications which are obviously incorrect. It is also unclear as to which version of the International Classification will be used, although we believe that it is likely to be the ninth edition.

Nevertheless, the written confirmation that the International Classification is in use, and that service marks are being accepted, must be welcomed. Gambia is one of the few countries in the region with a significant tourism industry, and we recommend that trade mark owners active in the service classes should file their trade marks in Gambia as soon as possible.

26th March 2008


Madagascar - Accession to the Madrid Protocol

On 28 January 2008, Madagascar deposited its instrument of accession to the Madrid Protocol concerning the International Registration of Marks. The Protocol enters into force in Madagascar on 28 April 2008.

Furthermore, Madagascar has announced that the time limit of one year to exercise the right to notify a refusal of protection of an international application is replaced by 18 months, in accordance with Article 5(2)(d) of the Protocol.

We anticipate that because of the relative ease of filing through the International Registration system, there will be a significant increase in companies wishing to register their marks in Madagascar. However, it is important for potential applicants to understand the trade mark registration system which operates in Madagascar, a first to file system which does not recognise common law rights through use. Applications are examined on relative grounds and in practice will be refused in the event that an identical or closely similar mark already exists. However, there is no provision to appeal against refusals to OMAPI, the Trade Mark Office; appeals must be filed through the courts. Similarly, whilst trade marks are published they cannot be opposed; the only remedy available is cancellation, which again must be filed through the courts. Not only does this make trade mark prosecution expensive, cases brought before the courts are subject to lengthy delays, and the level of knowledge of IP among judges and court officials in Madagascar is not particularly high, to say the least.

Furthermore Madagascar is a country in which trade mark piracy is rife, and local distributors of western products will regularly register the trade marks of the goods they are selling, but in their own name. We know of at least one local company that makes a habit of registering popular western brand names in their own name before the proprietor has done so, resulting in the rejection of the proprietors subsequent application by OMAPI. In the absence of an earlier registered right, it is extremely difficult to obtain cancellation of such registrations as there is no specific provision in the law to do so on the basis that they were filed in bad faith. Although Madagascar recognises the provisions of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention, owners of lesser-known marks who find that their marks are already registered are likely have problems in trying to cancel such registrations.

We take this opportunity to remind you that it is important for proprietors of trade marks which they intend to use in Madagascar, to register them sooner rather than later. Further, we recommend that proprietors wishing to file their trade mark in Madagascar, whether via Madrid or nationally, should conduct searches prior to filing to establish whether any problems are likely to be encountered. Searches in Madagascar are reliable by African standards and results can be obtained within 3 - 4 working days.

We have been lobbying OMAPI for changes in the law. Specific provision needs to be made for opposition, and such proceedings should be heard at OMAPI rather than by the courts. The law should also be amended to allow for opposition and cancellation proceedings to be filed on the basis of bad faith; ideally, we would like OMAPI to handle cancellation proceedings in the first instance as well.

It is hoped that Madagascar's accession to the Madrid Protocol will lead to a significant increase in demand for such changes in the law to be made.

14th March 2008


Bangladesh - Introduction of Service Marks

We have received reports from Bangladesh that the Trade Marks Act 2008 is now in force. The purpose of the new Act is to introduce service mark registration. It is understood that the Ninth Edition of the Nice Classification is being followed.

No further information about the contents of the new law, apart from the introduction of service marks, is known at this time. We understand that multi-class applications are still not accepted, so it seems likely that the introduction of service marks is the only feature of the new law. However, we recommend that any clients who may wish to register trade marks in the service classes should file as soon as possible.

Further information will be posted on this website as and when it is received.

13th March 2008


Gambia - Publication of Trade Marks Journal

We are very pleased to report that for the first time in 26 years, Gambia is beginning to publish the Trade Marks Journal again. This will come as a relief to applicants whose trade marks have been pending for over a quarter of a century, simply because publication has not taken place.

The Registry has indicated that it intends to deal with the considerable backlog of pending cases by publishing a significant number of Bulletins this year. Further information will be posted on this website as and when it has been received.

7th March 2008


Madagascar - Membership of Madrid Protocol

WIPO has announced that the terms of the Madrid Protocol will enter into force in Madagascar on 28 April 2008. However, we have yet to receive independent verification from OMAPI that the Madrid system will be fully operational as of that date. We will update this website as soon as further information is received.

7th March 2008


Kosovo - Update

As previously reported, the Kosovo IP Office opened on 19 November 2007. Since this date, it has been possible to file applications for the revalidation of existing Yugoslavian or Serbia and Montenegrin registrations, and to file new independent applications for trade marks, patents and designs. However, the IPO has recently advised that the deadline to revalidate such cases in Kosovo is 1 October 2008, not 18 November 2008 as previously advised.

The situation regarding International Registrations covering Serbia is that they are not enforceable in Kosovo. Whilst Serbia is a member of both the Madrid Agreement and Protocol, Kosovo is not, and as Kosovo does not consider itself to be part of Serbia, International Registrations covering Serbia are not valid or enforceable in Kosovo. Unfortunately, nothing can be done to remedy the situation as Kosovo cannot become a signatory to the Madrid Agreement or the Madrid Protocol unless it becomes a member of WIPO, and it cannot become a member of WIPO until it becomes a member of the UN. Due to the political problems relating to the international status of Kosovo, this cannot be expected to change in the near future.

Therefore, we recommend that holders of International Registrations covering Serbia should apply to register their marks as national applications in Kosovo, if protection in Kosovo is desired.

4th March 2008


Gambia - Revised Industrial Property Law - Patent Reregistrations

As previously posted on this website, we have been aware since November 2007 that the Industrial Property Act (1989) was published in the Gambia on 2 April 2007. Unfortunately, however, this fact was not made known either to local agents in the Gambia or internationally at the time of publication of the law, and there is a great deal of confusion as to whether the new law is actually in force now that it has been published. As the necessary implementing Rules and Regulations have yet to be prepared and published, it is believed by some that the law is not yet in full force and effect. However, others have been led to believe that the new law is indeed fully effective and that the provisions of the old laws are no longer applicable. We are currently awaiting urgent written clarification from the Gambian Registrar to this effect, but unfortunately the situation is still, at the time of writing, unresolved.

The new Act, once in effect, will repeal the following intellectual property Acts:

The Registration of United Kingdom Patents Act 1925
The United Kingdom Designs (Protection) Act 1936
The Trade Marks Act 1916

The main implications of the new law, from a patent perspective, are as follows:

Requirements for patentability
An invention must now satisfy the requirements of absolute novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability, and it must not relate to "excluded" subject matter (please see below).

Reregistration of granted UK patents
A requirement of absolute novelty of inventions is specified in the new law. Thus, the new law does not provide for the filing of applications for reregistration of granted UK or EP(UK) patents in the Gambia.

However, the new Act does include transitional provisions, which set a period of 12 months from entry into force of the revised Act, during which proprietors of UK or European(UK) patents may still apply for reregistration of their patents. The transitional period will expire on 2 April 2008, if it is deemed that the new law came into force on 2 April 2007. As stressed above, this is not yet clarified, and the deadline may well prove to be irrelevant or may be extended under the discretion of the Registrar. Please do, however, bear this date in mind should you have any UK patents that you wish to reregister in the Gambia, as it may well be that the date of 2 April 2008 is in fact strictly adhered to by the Registry.

Term of Protection and Annuity Payments
The new law specifies that a patent will be granted for a term of 15 years, extensible by a further five years upon request and upon provision of proof of working of the invention in the Gambia. Annuities are now payable annually, commencing on the first anniversary of the filing date of a patent application. Under the old law, maintenance fees were payable every four years from the date of registration of a patent in the Gambia.

Whilst it appears that annuities will be payable annually in respect of both UK-based reregistration patents and local independent patents, it is not yet clear whether back annuities will be payable in respect of existing cases, or indeed how existing cases will be treated under these new provisions. We are still awaiting clarification in this regard.

Exclusions from patentability
The new Patents Act lists several exclusions from patentability in the Gambia. Of particular note is the exclusion of methods of treatment of the human or animal body by surgery or therapy, as well as diagnostic methods practised on the human or animal body. This exclusion does not extend to products for use in any of these methods. We therefore suggest that claims relating to methods of treatment be drafted in the form: "Substance X for use in a method of treating disease Y" (in cases where Substance X has not been disclosed for use in the treatment of any such method in the prior art), or as Swiss-style claims ("Use of Substance X in the manufacture of a medicament for treating disease Y").

Utility Models
The revised Act provides for the grant of utility model certificates and independent design registrations in the Gambia.

We will post further information on this website as soon as we have any news to report.

Please do not hesitate to contact us should you require any clarification of the above matters.

27th February 2008


Dominica - Registration of Service Marks now Possible

For many years, Dominica has operated a dual system of trade mark registration. Applications may be filed locally, but the local law still uses the former British classification of fifty goods classes. Trade mark owners with national UK registrations can also base applications on their existing UK rights, and the resulting registration in Dominica will mirror that of the UK. However, until recently, it was not possible to include any of the service classes in a UK-based application.

We have just been informed that the Registrar in Dominica has determined that it is now possible to register service marks in Dominica, provided applications are based on a corresponding UK registration which is registered in the service classes. The situation regarding locally filed substantive applications remains unchanged.

Full particulars of this change in practice, particularly the effective date, have yet to be determined, and further information will be posted on our website as and when it is received.

26th February 2008


Turks & Caicos - Trade Marks Ordinance 2007

The Turks & Caicos Islands have introduced a new Trade Marks Ordinance, which took effect on 8 October 2007.

The new law abolishes the previous two-tier system of local registrations and re-registration of UK marks. The provisions of the law would appear to be broadly based upon the UK Trade Marks Act 1994, although the owners of national registrations in the UK, as well as owners of CTMs, would appear to be given special treatment under the law. We need to clarify a number of issues with the authorities in Turks & Caicos, but further information will be posted on this website as and when it is received.

7th December 2007


Gambia - Industrial Property Act (1989)

Whilst having recently become aware the that the Industrial Property Act (1989) came in to force in Gambia on 02 April 2007, we have been informed by our local associate that until such time as the implementing Rules and Regulations have been published, provisions contained in the new Act are not able to be followed.

With regard to the filing of trade marks, the new Act introduces the use of the International Classification system and also service marks. However, for the time being the Registrar is only able to accept applications using the old classification system (pre-1938 U.K. Classification - Schedule III). Once the Rules and Regulations have been published in Gambia, the new Act will take full effect, and any applications filed since 02 April 2007 will be re-classified by the Registry to comply with the International Classification system.

It is hoped that publication of the implementing Rules and Regulations may happen fairly soon, but this cannot be guaranteed. Gambia's track record in this area is not good, so we would anticipate a delay of 6-12 months or possibly even longer.

Further information will be posted on this website as and when it becomes available.

5th December 2007


Madagascar - Extension of Term of Patent Protection

As you may be aware, patents are currently granted in Madagascar for a term of 15 years from the filing date (or international filing date for PCT national phase applications), subject to the payment of annuities. Until now, an extension of term for a further 5 years has been available, but only if the national interest so demands and the invention is worked in a serious and satisfactory manner.

The Director General of the Madagascan Patent Office has now advised us, in a recent meeting held with Caroline van Dijk of Lysaght & Co. in Madagascar, that he would be prepared to accept all applications for extension, irrespective of whether or not the patent has been sufficiently worked.

An application for extension of the term of a patent must be filed within the two months preceding the date of expiry of the patent. Please mark your records to this effect, and let us have your further instructions should you wish for us to apply for an extension of the term of any of your cases. Whilst we will endeavour to send reminders at the appropriate times, the responsibility for ensuring that we receive instructions to extend the term of any case remains with the applicant or proprietor of the patent.

3rd December 2007


Gambia - Industrial Property Act (1989)

We have recently become aware that the Industrial Property Act (1989) came in to force in Gambia on 02 April 2007.

This new Act repeals the following I.P. Acts:

The Registration of United Kingdom Patents Act 1925
The United Kingdom Designs (Protection) Act 1936
The Trade Marks Act 1916

The necessary implementing Rules and Regulations have yet to be prepared and published, so while the new law is officially in force, in practice the absence of implementing regulations means that the law is not yet in full force and effect.. All our clients will be contacted by e-mail as soon as we have definite news regarding the implementation of the new law, and a notice will also be published on this web site at that time.

29th November 2007


Montenegro, Serbia and Kosovo - Registration of Intellectual Property Rights

As you may be aware, the former State Union of Serbia and Montenegro (YU) ceased to exist on 3 June 2006 and accordingly, Montenegro became an independent sovereign state on that date. We set out below the developments which have occurred since this dissolution of the former State Union, as well as developments in the related jurisdiction of Kosovo.

MONTENEGRO

Some time ago, the Government of Montenegro adopted a Decree which provided for the establishment of a national Intellectual Property (IP) Office. The Decree came into force on 19 May 2007, and stipulated that the IP Office would start operating within the following 60 days. Nevertheless, the Office is still yet to become functional, and indeed this development is not expected until at least December 2007.

According to the Regulations of the Government of Montenegro, which will be published in the Official Gazette number 61/2007, there will be no need for separate revalidation of national Serbia-Montenegro and/or Serbian Intellectual Property Rights in Montenegro. All national IP rights registered in the Union of Serbia and Montenegro (and in the Republic of Serbia as from 3 June 2006) will be automatically valid in Montenegro if these were registered before the cut-off date, which will be the date of the official inauguration of the Montenegrin Intellectual Property Office. No special revalidation procedure will be required, and the owners of the national Intellectual Property Rights will only be required to maintain their rights in Montenegro once these become due for renewal. Any application for renewal of national Intellectual Property rights filed in Serbia prior to the inauguration of the Montenegrin Intellectual Property Office will be accepted in Montenegro.

However, in respect of any national rights filed in the Union of Serbia and Montenegro (and in the Republic of Serbia as from 3 June 2006) which are not yet registered (i.e. are still in the application stage), a new application will need to be filed in Montenegro, which will retain the original filing/priority date of the application filed in the Union of Serbia and Montenegro (and in the Republic of Serbia as from 3 June 2006). Such rights will continue their examination and registration procedure in Montenegro itself. This applies to all unregistered applications which were filed in the Union of Serbia and Montenegro (before 3 June 2006) and the applications filed in Serbia (between 3 June 2006 and the date of the formal inauguration of the Montenegrin Intellectual Property Office). Applicants must submit proof of the relevant applications, together with all supporting documentation filed with the Serbian Intellectual Property Office, within 6 months from the date of the inauguration of the Intellectual Property Office (whenever that may be).

Particular provisions apply to international trade mark registrations, patents filed under the PCT and EPC procedures, and international design registrations, and we would be pleased to provide further details of these if required.

SERBIA

All national Intellectual Property Rights registered or applied for in Yugoslavia, Serbia and Montenegro and Serbia, continue to be automatically valid in the Republic of Serbia (country code RS) as a successor State.

KOSOVO

Kosovo, although still formally a part of Serbia, has adopted its own Patent Act which entered into force on 21 December 2004. According to this Act, registered IP rights before the Serbia and Montenegro Intellectual Property Office will no longer be valid in the territory of Kosovo once the Kosovo Intellectual Property Office is inaugurated. Therefore, revalidation of Intellectual Property rights registered in Yugoslavia or Serbia and Montenegro will be required in Kosovo, and according to the Patent Act of Kosovo, the deadline for revalidating registered rights from Serbia and Montenegro in Kosovo will be 12 months from the date of inauguration of the Intellectual Property Office there.

We have today been advised that the Kosovo IP office will start functioning on 19 November 2007. From this date, it will be possible to file applications for the revalidation of existing Yugoslavian or Serbia and Montenegrin registrations, and to file new independent applications for trade marks, patents and designs.

The rights eligible for revalidation in Kosovo are all those rights registered in Serbia/Yugoslavia before 19 November 2007. All rights which have been applied for, but not registered, before 19 November 2007 in Serbia must be re-filed in Kosovo in order for the rights to exist there, but such re-applications will maintain the original application dates of the Serbia/Yugoslavia applications.

As mentioned above, the deadline for effecting the revalidation in Kosovo of existing registrations is 12 months starting from 19 November 2007 (i.e. on or before 18 November 2008). In order to revalidate an existing registration in Kosovo, the following documentation is required:

  • Proof of valid right in Serbia/Yugoslavia;
  • Power of Attorney, simply signed.


All former Serbian/Yugoslav rights which are not revalidated during this period will cease to be valid in Kosovo. As from 19 November 2007, Kosovo exists as a separate IP jurisdiction, and all new applications will be treated independently from those in Serbia.

Should you wish to be advised of the costs involved in revalidating existing registrations or filing new applications in Kosovo, or you require any further information or assistance in safeguarding your rights in these jurisdictions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

We will update this website as soon as we have any further news.

14th November 2007


Iraq - Abolition of the Boycott Declaration Requirement - update

Further to the article posted on this website on 30 July 2007 regarding the apparent cancellation of the requirement for an Israeli Boycott Declaration in respect of trade mark and patent applications, we have now received advice that the Declaration is, in fact, still required by the Patent Office. The Declaration must therefore still be filed in respect of patent (but not trade mark) applications.

7th November 2007


Angola - Accession to PCT and Paris Convention

The Republic of Angola (country code: AO) became the 138th PCT Contracting State on 27 September 2007. The PCT will enter into force for this State on 27 December 2007, and as of that date, Angola may be designated in international applications.

The Republic of Angola also deposited its instrument of accession to the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property on 27 September 2007, and the Paris Convention will therefore enter into force there on 27 December 2007.

Please note, however, that the law in Angola has not yet been amended to recognize the PCT, and it therefore unlikely that PCT national phase applications will be prosecuted until such time as the relevant laws have been put into place. Furthermore, it is not clear at the present time as to whether such national phase applications will afford any enforceable rights. You may therefore decide that it is preferable, until the law has been amended to provide for PCT applications, to file Convention patent applications in Angola until this situation has been resolved.

We will monitor this situation on a regular basis, and further details will be posted on this website as soon as any developments have occurred.

11th October 2007


Yemen - Recent developments in Intellectual Property Laws

Yemen joined the Paris Convention Agreement in March 2007, and it is therefore now possible to claim priority in respect of trade marks within 6 months, designs within 6 months and patents within 1 year from the filing date of the earliest filed application.

Furthermore, the long-overdue regulations implementing the patent provisions of the Intellectual Property Law of Yemen (Law no. 19 of October 1994) finally came into force on 2 July 2007, and patent applications will therefore now start to be processed by the Yemeni Patent Office. Until now, the Patent Office in Yemen merely accepted the filing of patent applications, which were then held in abeyance pending the issuance of the regulations. The new regulations now provide for the examination and publication of patent applications, the grant of patents, and the payment of annuities.

The main features of the implementing regulations are as follows:


  • Patent applications are examined as to form, novelty, and industrial applicability.
  • Patent applications are published in the Official Gazette upon acceptance.
  • Oppositions may be filed within 6 months from the publication date.
  • Patents are granted for a term of 15 years from the filing date.
  • Renewal fees are due annually, on each anniversary of the filing date. A 6-month grace period is provided for late payment with a surcharge.
  • Absolute novelty is required. However, disclosure of an invention in an official or officially recognized national/international exhibitions shall not be taken into consideration if it occurred within a 6-month grace period preceding the filing date of the patent application.
  • Patents of Addition are provided for.


The implementing regulations specify that the following documents are required for filing a patent application in Yemen:

1- Power of Attorney, legalized to the level of the Yemeni Consulate - due 60 days from the filing date;
2- Extract from the commercial register, legalized to the level of the Yemeni Consulate - due within 60 days from the filing date;
3- Deed of Assignment from the inventor(s), legalized to the level of the Yemeni Consulate - due within 60 days from the filing date;
4- Abstract of the invention, in English and Arabic - due within 60 days from the filing date;
5- Specification, in English and Arabic - due within 60 days from the filing date;
6- Certified copy of priority document(s), if priority is claimed - due within 90 days of the filing date.

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any further queries in this matter.

9th August 2007


Ghana - Two-Tier System for Trade Mark Renewal Terms

Pursuant to the previous posting regarding this matter, our local advisers have taken up the matter with the Head of the Legislative Drafting Section who has confirmed that the Act was drafted incorrectly, as it was not their intention to create the two-tier system which is now in operation. We understand that the legislation will be amended to reflect a ten year renewal term for all marks, regardless of when they are registered. Further information will be posted on the website in due course.

30th July 2007


Iraq - Abolition of the Boycott Declaration Requirement

We are pleased to advise that the Iraqi authorities have cancelled the previous requirement that an Israeli Boycott Declaration should be submitted in respect of trade mark and patent applications. Whilst the Boycott Declaration was not required at the time of filing an application, the Registry was previously refusing to process applications until such a Declaration had been filed.

It is hoped that the backlog of pending applications may now be progressed to publication.

30th July 2007


Ghana - Two-Tier System for Trade Mark Renewal Terms

The Trade Marks Act 2004 entered into force in Ghana on 29 January 2004.

This modernised the law in a number of respects, introducing the Nice Classification, service marks, and a ten year renewal term, replacing the previous regime of an initial term of seven years and a fourteen year renewal term.

However, we have recently discovered that the new renewal term only applies to trade marks filed on or after 29 January 2004. Registrations obtained before the new law entered into force are still subject to the old regime of seven and fourteen years. We believe that this is due to clumsily phrased transitional provisions in the new Act.

Whilst the new Act repeals the former law and states that trade marks registered under the old law "shall remain in forceand shall be deemed to have been registered under this Act", Section 53(4) of the 2004 Act states that trade marks registered under the old law "shall be due for renewal for a period of fourteen years from the date of expiration of the original registration or of the last renewal of the registration and upon renewal shall be reclassified in accordance with the International Classification". Unfortunately, the Act does not explicitly state that upon renewal, the renewal term under the 2004 Act will apply.

Our local advisers agree that this situation is most unfortunate and that it would not have been the intention of the legislators to create the two-tier system currently applied by the Registry. The matter has been referred to the Registrar-General, the Attorney General and the Head of the Legislative Drafting Team at the Ministry of Justice, and it is hoped that the matter can be resolved soon.

16th July 2007


Vietnam - "Use" claims deemed unpatentable

We have just learnt that the Ministry of Science and Technology in Vietnam has issued a Circular No. 01/2007/TT-BKHCN providing guidelines for implementing the procedure of Establishing Industrial Property Rights. This Circular took effect on 09 May 2007 and supersedes the previous provisions on this matter. One point of particular note is that use claims are not considered to be patentable subject matter. We do not totally agree with this provision, and indeed the Vietnamese Patent Office has not issued any further official decision in respect of any case which includes such use claims.

Further details will be posted on this website as and when they are received.

3rd July 2007


Antigua - New Patents Act

Further to our recent article on this website regarding the introduction of a new patent law in Antigua, we have just learnt that the Registrar has allowed an extension of time for filing patent applications under the old Act, which will expire on 15 July 2007. If you wish to file any patent applications for the registration of granted UK or European (UK) patents, please therefore send us your instructions as soon as possible so that we may ensure that this deadline is met.

4th June 2007


Antigua - New Patents Act

We have been advised that a new Patents Act has recently come into force in Antigua, which repeals the previous Patents Act and Registration of United Kingdom Patents Act, and which introduces a requirement of absolute novelty. Whilst we have received a copy of and reviewed the new law, it is unclear as to whether it is actually deemed to be in force yet, and the implementing regulations have not yet been finalized. Furthermore, the Patent Registry has been refusing to accept new applications until such time as the provisions of the new law and regulations have been clarified. The fees payable and documents required for filing new patent applications in Antigua are also not clear, but we do understand that it will no longer be possible to base applications on UK registrations.

Other provisions of the new law include:-

  • Applications may be filed with priority claims;

  • Third parties may apply to the court to invalidate a patent, based on the grounds that, inter alia, the invention relates to excluded subject matter, lacks novelty, inventive step and/or industrial applicability, or the description is not sufficiently clear and complete.

  • The term of a patent is twenty years counted from the filing date of the application for grant. Annual renewal fees are payable on the first and each subsequent anniversary of the filing date. A six-month grace period is allowed for the payment of renewal fees.

  • Provisions for the filing and processing of PCT applications have been introduced.


Further details will be posted on this website as and when they are received.


1st June 2007


Antigua - New Trade Marks Act 2003 and Regulations

The Trade Marks Act 2003 entered into force in Antigua in April 2007.

The new Act abolishes the dual system of local applications, and applications based on existing UK marks. It is no longer possible to base an application in Antigua on a UK registration; however, the new Act adopts the International Classification, and allows for the registration of service marks. Whilst the new law and regulations do not specifically state so, it is believed that the Ninth Edition of the Nice Classification will be operative.

Other provisions of the new law include:-

  • Applications may be filed with priority claims;
  • Applications will be published for opposition, the opposition term being three months;
  • Cancellation of registrations for non-use will be possible, the relevant period being three years;
  • The law makes provision for the registration of collective marks;
  • Licences maybe recorded for the first time. In order to be valid, the licence must provide for effective quality control of the goods/services by the licensor.
  • The term of a registration will be ten years, counted from the application date. A six-month grace period is allowed for the payment of renewal fees.
  • The law makes provision for the implementation of the Madrid Protocol in Antigua. However, the corresponding regulations governing the processing of International Registrations have yet to issue.


22nd May 2007


Antigua - New Trade Marks Act and Regulations

We have been advised that a new Trade Marks Act came into force in Antigua on 9 April 2007. Whilst details of the new law have yet to be received, we understand that it will no longer be possible to base applications on UK registrations, but substantive applications will follow the international classification and furthermore, it will be possible to register service marks.

This is the only information we have available at the moment, but further details will be posted on this website as and when they are received.

19th April 2007


Malta - Closing of National Route via PCT

Malta has informed WIPO that it has closed its national route via the PCT. Thus, any international application filed on after Malta's date of accession to the PCT, 1 March 2007, will include the designation of Malta only for a European patent, and not also for a national patent.

11th April 2007


Nigeria - Registration of Service Marks

The Registrar has implemented the provisions of sections 42 and 45 of the Trade Marks Act to incorporate service marks into the classification system used in Nigeria, and the Registry has started to accept applications for service marks with immediate effect.

Contrary to the Registry's previous announcement regarding the service mark classification, it is the Ninth Edition of the Nice Classification which has been adopted.

It should be borne in mind that the sudden introduction of service mark protection is open to challenge, and there is a strong possibility that it will be found to be invalid if challenged in the courts. This is because sections 42 and 45, which empower the Registrar to alter the classification system used in Nigeria, both refer to the classification of goods and do not refer to services. We have been advised that the Registrar's argument that services are "intangible goods" is unlikely to find favour in the courts.

Although the legality of this sudden change in practice is open to question, we recommend that any clients who would be interested in filing their service marks in Nigeria should do so as soon as possible.

3rd April 2007


Syria - New Intellectual Property Law

Law No. 8 of 2007, for Distinctive Marks, Geographical Indications and Industrial Designs and Models, will enter into force on April 12, 2007.

According to the law, a trade mark shall be registered if it is distinctive, and may consist of words, letters, numbers, figures, colours, or other signs that are visually perceptible. The law provides protection for collective, certification and service marks, and recognises internationally well-known trade marks even if they are not registered in Syria. The law introduces opposition proceedings for the first time, where a period of 90 days from the publication date will be given during which any third party can oppose a trade mark application.

The law also brings in developments in the Intellectual Property (IP) field including, improved customs measures, a specialized court to settle IP cases and the regulation of IP agents in Syria.

With respect to the duration of protection, a registered trade mark is valid for 10 years from the date of filing the application, renewable for similar consecutive periods. Non-use of the trade mark for continuous three years without a legitimate reason makes it subject for cancellation by any interested person.

We have been advised that the new law introduces a single class registration system for trade marks which is something of a retrograde step and will cause additional expense for many trade mark proprietors. However, this has yet to be confirmed, as have the fees applicable under the new law. Full details of the new law have yet to be clarified, but further information will be posted on our website as and when it is received.

30th March 2007


Dominican Republic - Accession to the PCT

On 28 February 2007, The Dominican Republic deposited its instrument of accession to the PCT, and on 28 May 2007, will become bound by the PCT. Consequently, any international application filed on or after 28 May 2007 will automatically include the designation of The Dominican Republic, and the application can enter the national phase in The Dominican Republic at 30 months from the earliest priority date.

5th March 2007


Malta - Malta Joins European Patent Convention

On 1 December 2006, Malta deposited its instrument of accession to the European Patent Convention (EPC), and will become bound by that Convention on 1 March 2007. This brings the number of Contracting States of the EPC to 32. Any international application filed on or after 1 March 2007 will therefore include the designation of Malta for a European patent.

12th February 2007


Bahrain - Bahrain Joins PCT

On 18 December 2006, Bahrain deposited its instrument of accession to the PCT, and on 18 March 2007, will become bound by the PCT. Consequently, any international application filed on or after 18 March 2007 will automatically include the designation of Bahrain.

Furthermore, because Bahrain will be bound by Chapter II of the PCT, it will automatically be elected in any demand for international preliminary examination filed in respect of an international application filed on or after 18 March 2007.

12th February 2007


Tonga - Trade Marks Registry destroyed by fire

We have been advised that as a result of civil unrest in Tonga, the Ministry of Commerce, which houses the Trade Marks Registry, has been completely destroyed by fire. All files were lost in the fire, and substantial delays can be expected in respect of all trade marks for the foreseeable future.

The Registry is still operating on a skeleton staff in temporary premises, so new applications, and renewals of existing cases, can be accepted. Reconstituting the Registry's files will take some time, but we can assure all of our clients with existing cases that their files have already been sent to the Registry's temporary offices.

Further information will be posted on this website as and when it is received.

4th January 2007


Burundi - New Trade Marks Law

We have received and reviewed a draft of the new Burundi Trade Marks Law.

Whilst the date of coming into force of this new law has not yet been set, the following points are worth noting at this stage :-

  • Trade Marks, Service Marks, Collective Marks, Certification Marks and Commercial Names will be registerable under the new law;
  • Rights accrue to the first party to use, and a Trade Mark application can be refused registration on the basis prior unregistered use by a third party in Burundi;
  • There is provision for the Registrar to allow the concurrent existence of identical marks for identical goods or services on the register;
  • Convention priority can be claimed;
  • Applications can be based on a Paris Union or WTO home registration;
  • Renewal is due 10 years from the filing date in Burundi, and every 10 years thereafter;
  • There is a 6 month grace period for attending to the renewal, with a late fine;
  • All license agreements must include a provision for the licensor to retain quality control;
  • Compulsory licenses can be issued by the Registry.

It is not clear at this stage what effect the new law will have on existing registrations, as there is at present no renewal due for Trade Marks in Burundi.

We shall publish further news as soon as we are able.



22nd December 2006


Mozambique - Increase in Official Fees

New official fees for trade marks, patents and other IP matters in Mozambique were enacted in the Official Gazette on 13 December 2006 and will become effective on 11 February 2007. We hope to be able to release our new scale of fees by mid-January 2007. For those who regularly use Lysaght & Co. for their Mozambique trade mark and patent work, we also draw your attention to the fact that the power of attorney required for filing has just changed. Please contact us to obtain a copy of the new form for your future use.

20th December 2006


Malta - Malta Joins PCT

On 1 December 2006, Malta deposited its instrument of accession to the PCT, and on 1 March 2007, will become bound by the PCT. Consequently, any international application filed on or after 1 March 2007 will automatically include the designation of Malta, and the application can enter the national phase in Malta at 30 months from the earliest priority date.

Also, because Malta will be bound by Chapter II of the PCT, it will automatically be elected in any demand for international preliminary examination filed in respect of an international application filed on or after 1 March 2007.

12th December 2006


Bahrain - New Patent Law

We have just learnt that a new patents law has recently been introduced in Bahrain, although we are yet to establish the main provisions of this new law. Furthermore, since the Implementing Regulations have yet to be issued, it is unclear of the impact that this law will have on the validity of revalidation applications based on published foreign patents. However, we anticipate that the new law may prevent the filing of revalidation patents in Bahrain, and may even invalidate revalidation patents which have already been filed and/or granted there.

We will keep you apprised of any further information that we can ascertain in this matter.

15th September 2006


Guinea - Validity of Renewals filed after 4 December 1998

Guinea joined OAPI on 30 January 1990 and since that date, all new applications filed at OAPI extend automatically to Guinea and it has no longer been possible to file fresh trade mark applications at the Guinea Registry. However, the Guinea Registry has continued to operate for the purpose of maintaining existing Guinea registrations.

On 4 December 1998, the OAPI Extension Regulation came into force which enables the owners of OAPI trade marks to extend their rights to new countries that join OAPI, including (retroactively), Guinea. This Regulation further provides that Trade Mark Offices of new countries joining OAPI are required to transfer all their files to OAPI, and that such rights should thereafter be maintained at OAPI. However, Guinea has not complied with this requirement and has continued to renew its own trade marks.

We have for some time been trying to obtain clarification from OAPI regarding the legality of this situation. During a recent meeting with the OAPI Officials it was indicated that it is up to Guinea to take the appropriate steps to comply with the provisions of the Extension Regulation and that OAPI has no influence over this. Furthermore, in OAPI's opinion, regardless of whether Guinea complies with the Extension Regulation, in terms of the Regulation the validity of renewal certificates issued by the Guinea Registry for renewals due after 4 December 1998, is open to challenge.

The OAPI Officials are investigating what can be done to regularise this situation, but until this problem has been resolved, the enforceability of Guinea renewals effected since 4 December 1998 is uncertain, and we recommend that from now on the OAPI route is used to maintain Guinea trade mark rights.

The options are as follows:



  • If there is an existing corresponding OAPI registration filed after 30 January 1990, this automatically covers Guinea, and no further action is required.
  • If there is an existing corresponding OAPI registrations filed before 30 January 1990, this can be extended to Guinea, as well as the other territories that joined OAPI (Mali, Equatorial Guinea, and Guinea Bissau) - if appropriate.
  • If there is no existing corresponding OAPI registration either:

i) a fresh OAPI application can be filed, which will cover all the OAPI states, including Guinea, from the date of filing.

ii) A currently valid Guinea Registration can be extended to OAPI, maintaining the Guinea prior rights. The cost is 635.00 GBP . Please note, however, that the term of protection granted is the remaining period of the Guinea registration and OAPI renewal fees will be payable on the expiry of the Guinea registration. (Cost 905.00 GBP).

iii) OAPI have verbally indicated that a currently valid Guinea trade mark can be renewed at OAPI when it next falls due, without the requirement to pay an extension fee. (Cost 905.00 GBP).

However in respect of both options ii) and iii) until the necessary amendments have been made to the OAPI Regulations, it is not certain whether OAPI will accept as a valid registration, a Guinea trade mark that has been renewed by the Guinea Registry after 4 December 1998.

5th July 2006


Cape Verde - Trade Mark Protection

According to information recently received, it is now possible to deposit Trade Mark Applications with the Cape Verde Authorities, despite the fact that there is no actual Intellectual Property Law Legislation in place.

We have been advised that the authorities are accepting applications on the basis of the Portuguese Industrial Property Law of 1940. The Decree-Law No. 7/2003 of 7 April 2003 has not yet been approved and implemented but, according to our sources, this is currently underway.

Because of the uncertainty of the current situation, we are somewhat sceptical as to how valid any applications filed under the present arrangement may be, and we would recommend that our clients wait until proper legislation is in place before filing applications. However, we are willing to accept and file any applications at the owner's own risk, if they so wish.

Our charges for filing applications at the present time are as follows:- Trade Mark Application in up to five items of goods or services - GBP 735.00
Each additional group of five items of goods or services - GBP 90.00

The above charges exclude translations and communication disbursements.

A Power of Attorney legalised up to a Cape Verde Embassy is required and MUST be filed with the application. If legalisation cannot be obtained up to a Cape Verde Embassy, legalisation by Apostille will be accepted and further legalisation can be obtained locally at additional cost.

Furthermore, Cape Verde is operating a single-class registration system.

8th June 2006


Guernsey - Trade Marks (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Ordinance 2006

The new Trade Mark law of Guernsey came into force on 1 June 2006.

The Ordinance establishes a two-tier system of registration. For the first time, substantive registrations are possible, known to the authorities as "primary registrations". However, it will also be possible to seek re-registration of a UK trade mark in Guernsey, as under the previous law. Whilst the Regulations have yet to be published, it is understood that it is also possible to apply for the re-registration of a Community Trade Mark as well as an International Registration designating the UK. It is not currently known whether a re-registration application will take the date of the corresponding UK mark, or whether the date of filing in Guernsey will be the effective date of filing. It is hoped that the Regulations will shed some light on this, and these are expected to be published shortly.

The text of the new law mirrors the UK Trade Marks Act 1994 to the extent that it is almost identical to it. It therefore makes provision for Guernsey to join the Paris Convention, the Madrid Protocol, and gives the authorities power to enforce the Community Trade Mark Regulation at some stage in future. Whilst the law enables the Registrar to refuse applications on absolute or relative grounds, it is our understanding that examination on relative grounds will not actually take place. Instead, there is a section on the application forms requiring applicants or their agents to state that " as far as (they) are aware, having made reasonable enquiries, the registration of this mark is not prohibited by Section 5 (relative grounds of refusal for registration)". Thus, searching prior to filing will be vital if an application for a primary registration is filed, and we also recommend to applicants for re-registration of marks, particularly CTMs, search in Guernsey prior to filing. However, the efficiency of the search facility provided by the Registry be remains to be seen.

We can now publish our charges for filing applications and renewals under the new law, and our scale of fees is available for download from this page. The cost of applying for a primary registration is very high considering the size of Guernsey as a market for trade mark owners; the official fees are more than in the UK. However, it is thought that the Primary Registration system will mainly be used by local traders in Guernsey who have no wish to register their marks in the UK and/or at OHIM first.

8th June 2006


Guernsey - Trade Marks (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Ordinance 2006

Despite the fact that the new Trade Marks Law of Guernsey will enter into force on 1 June 2006, the regulations and the transitional provisions have yet to be published by the Guernsey authorities. However, we are in a position to provide the following information.

The new law is substantive and replaces the existing law allowing only re-registration of existing national registrations in the UK. The text of the new law mirrors the UK Trade Marks Act 1994 to the extent that it is almost identical to it. It therefore makes provision for Guernsey to join the Paris Convention, the Madrid Protocol, and gives the authorities power to enforce the Community Trade Mark Regulation at some stage in future.

The new law differentiates between applications for "primary registration", namely an application for a substantive registration, and an application for re-registration of an existing mark, such as a UK Registration. Whilst the Regulations have yet to be published, it is thought that applications may also be based on CTM Registrations, as well as International Registrations covering the UK.

The new law requires applicants to complete a Declaration that the registration of the trade mark is not prohibited by Section 5, which concerns relative grounds for refusal. We consider that this places an unreasonable onus on applicants, as it should be the Registrar's duty to ensure that an application complies with the requirements of the law. We consider that whilst this requirement may cause difficulties for those applying for a "primary registration", those applying to re-register an existing UK registration would probably be more comfortable with making the statement.

The States of Guernsey published the Official Fees at the end of last week. The fee for filing a new substantive application is significantly more than expected, although there is a lower figure for a "re-registration" application (accompanied by evidence of registration in the UK). For this reason, as well as that mentioned above, we recommend that those wishing to register their trade marks in Guernsey continue to base applications on existing registrations, either at OHIM or in the UK.

It is not currently known whether a "re-registration" application will take the date of the corresponding UK mark, or whether the date of filing in Guernsey will be the effective date of filing.

Our charges for filing under the new law are currently being determined and we will publish these as soon as possible.

31st May 2006


Uruguay - Circular

We refer to our article of 13 February 2006.

We have been advised that a procedure has now been established which may allow applicants to expedite the prosecution of their patent applications. Recently, our associate in Uruguay met with the Director of the Uruguayan Patent Office, and it was agreed that the prosecution of applications may be expedited by submitting details of the allowance of any corresponding applications by Patent Offices abroad which relate to the same subject matter of the invention.

Fort this purpose, we would need to file a writ informing the Uruguayan Patent Office of the equivalent patents and indicating that, if necessary, the applicant would be prepared to modify the claims on record so as to conform with those granted abroad.

In any case, the Uruguayan application will be subjected to substantive examination as required by the local legislation, but the results of the examination carried out in other countries will serve to accelerate this procedure.

We would therefore recommend that you send to us the grant details of any patents which have been allowed elsewhere in relation to your inventions, so that we may submit this information to the Patent Office in Uruguay.

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions.

21st April 2006


Guernsey - The Trade Marks (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Ordinance 2006

We have received word from our contacts in Guernsey that a new law has been passed which is expected to enter into force on 1 June 2006. The new law is substantive and replaces the existing law allowing only re-registration of existing national registrations in the UK. The text of the new law mirrors the UK Trade Marks Act 1994 to the extent that it is almost identical to it. It therefore makes provision for Guernsey to join the Paris Convention, the Madrid Protocol, and gives the authorities power to enforce the Community Trade Mark Regulation at some stage in future. Although we are assured that the new law will be effective as of 1 June 2006 , no regulations, fees or transitional provisions have been published. We will post further information on this website as and when details unfold.

15th March 2006


Kosovo - New Patent Law

  • Requirement for inventive step, industrial applicability and absolute novelty
  • Provision for claiming priority from applications filed in a member state of the Paris Convention or World Trade Organisation
  • Provision for protection of biological material
  • Exclusion of patent protection for (inter alia) animal breeds, plant varieties, biological processes for the production of plants or animals, the human body at various stages of development including the sequence or partial sequence of a gene, diagnostic or surgical methods or methods of treatment on the human or animal body
  • Automatic acceptance of patentability decisions issued by the EPO or other PCT International Preliminary Examination Authorities for corresponding foreign applications
  • 20 year term of protection subject to the payment of annuities for the third and following years from the date of filing
  • Transitional provision for revalidation within a period of 12 months in respect of applications pending or patents registered at the Intellectual Property Office of Serbia and Montenegro at the time of coming into force of the Kosovo Patent Law, as well as PCT applications filed at the International Bureau designating Serbia and Montenegro which are pending at the time of coming into force of the Kosovo Patent Law

02nd March 2006


Kosovo - New Intellectual Property Law

With the inevitability that Kosovo will soon become an independent sovereign state, breaking away from Serbia & Montenegro, moves are at an advanced stage for establishing separate Intellectual Property laws for Kosovo.

We have forged good links with a local associate in Kosovo, and have been informed that the Kosovo Intellectual Property Office is due to open on 31 March 2006. However, from past experience in dealing with this region of the world we would suspect that the office is more likely to open during the second half of 2006.

Once the Kosovo I.P. laws have come in to force, and the I.P. Office is open, rights previously registered in Serbia and Montenegro will no longer be valid in Kosovo. However, there will be a 12 month “window of opportunity” for owners to extend Serbia and Montenegro rights to Kosovo.

We strongly recommend obtaining I.P. rights in the Kosovo area and, wherever possible, retaining priority rights gained via Serbia and Montenegro, as the region is a stronghold for counterfeiting activities. Just in the past six months, our local associates have intervened in more than 20 cases of counterfeit products.

If you require more information about extending existing Serbia and Montenegro I.P. rights to Kosovo, or indeed the filing of new trade marks or patents in Kosovo, please let us know.

01st March 2006


Malta - Annuity Payments

Further to our previous website article in this matter, we have now received a copy of the official circular issued by the Maltese Registry, which clarifies that annuities now fall due on the second anniversary of the local filing date and annually thereafter in respect of all patent applications filed on or after 1 January 2005 (not 1 January 2006 as previously advised).

For all applications filed before 1 January 2005, annuities will continue to fall due on the fourth and each subsequent anniversary of the local filing date.

We will endeavour to write to our clients regarding each Maltese patent case individually, when annuities become due for payment.

If you have any questions in this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us.

20th February 2006


Uruguay - Circular

We have recently been informed by our associate in Uruguay that the Uruguayan Patent Office has now initiated examination of patent applications. In order to try and decrease the backlog and thus avoid unnecessary delays in respect of pending applications, an official notice will be issued on each pending application. The official notice will allocate a term of ten (10) days for the Applicant to state continued interest in the application, or whether it is to be abandoned.

However, instead of waiting for the official notice to issue, the Patent Commissioner will accept the filing of a single Writ per Applicant, stating the Applicant’s continued interest to continue prosecution of the cases detailed on a list attached thereto.

This would, to some extent, expedite prosecution, as we would not have to wait for the issue of an official notice in respect of each pending application.

We feel that, at this stage, it would be prudent for all of our clients to undertake an investigation into their pending patent applications in Uruguay and let us know which pending applications are still of interest and which are to lapse.

There is no risk in waiting for the official notice to issue in respect of each pending application, provided we can receive your urgent response thereto when the notice does issue. However, please note that, in the absence of any instructions to the contrary by the deadline set in the official notice, we will respond to the notice to the effect that the captioned application is still of interest.

Please do not hesitate to contact us if anything is unclear or if you have any questions.

13th February 2006


Chile - New Industrial Property Law –Update

Further to our previous articles on this website, in which we reported that that the Chilean Law on Industrial Property was finally enacted on 1 December 2005, we can now confirm that the revalidation of foreign granted patents is no longer possible under the new law, as a requirement of absolute novelty has now been introduced. Other provisions of importance in the new law include the broadening of the definition of patentable subject matter and the extension of the term of a patent from 15 years calculated from the registration date to 20 years calculated from the filing date. Annuities are now payable for consecutive ten-yearly periods, after a patent application has been accepted. These provisions apply only to patent applications filed after the date of introduction into force of the new law (1 December 2005). Please let us know if you have any questions in this regard.

30th January 2006


Malta - Annuity Payments

We have just been advised that the provisions in the Maltese Patent law for the payment of annuities have been amended, with effect from 1 January 2006. The amendments have the result that, for all patent applications filed after 1 January 2006, annuities become payable on the second anniversary of the local filing date and annually thereafter. Previously, annuities only became payable on the fourth and each subsequent anniversary of the local filing date. The Patent Office has not yet issued their circular in this regard, nor have the revised annuity fees been promulgated. We will report to you more fully, especially regarding whether this amendment will affect existing applications for which annuity payments have already commenced, as soon as we have received further clarification of these changes. If you have any questions in this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us.

11th January 2006


Chile - New Industrial Property Law – Update

Further to our previous articles on this website, we can now report that the Chilean Law on Industrial Property was finally enacted on 1 December 2005. The new legislation serves to amend the previous patent and trade mark laws in order to comply with International Treaties such as TRIPS and the Free Trade Agreements signed with the EU and the USA. We are currently seeking further clarification of the provisions of the new legislation, and we will post further articles on our website when we have obtained this clarification.

11th January 2006


Sao Tome and Principe - New Intellectual Property Law – Patents

Following on from our article on this website summarising the new intellectual property law relating to trade marks in the jurisdiction of Sao Tome and Principe, we have managed to obtain some information relating to the patent law.

As with trade marks, the current patent law has been in existence in Sao Tome since 2001, but since then it has not been possible to file patent applications under this law due to the absence of the corresponding implementing regulations. It appears that these regulations have now issued, and we therefore understand that patent applications can now be filed in Sao Tome.

We have yet to receive a copy of the law and regulations, but we can advise that Sao Tome is a member of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, and it is therefore possible to claim priority from one or more prior applications. The official language in Sao Tome is Portuguese, and the specification of the invention (including a title, description, claims, abstract and drawings, if any) must therefore be translated into this language and filed in duplicate. Certain subject matter, including methods for the treatment of the human or animal body by surgery or therapy, and diagnostic methods practised on the human or animal body, are excluded from patentability, although products for use in such methods may be protected. Examination is carried out as to form, and substantive examination is also carried out to determine whether the invention meets the criteria of novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability.

The term of a patent in Sao Tome is 20 years from the filing date, subject to the payment of annuities on each anniversary of the filing date. A grace period of six months is provided for the late payment of annuity fees, subject to a surcharge.

The holder of a patent is obliged to exploit the patented invention, and a compulsory licence may be granted if the holder does not fulfil this obligation.

We will publish any further information that we are able to glean in this matter, but please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any specific questions.

03rd October 2005


Chile - New Industrial Property Law – Patents - Update

This article serves to update you on the situation detailed in our earlier article on this website, dated 29 April 2005, concerning the introduction of the long-awaited Industrial Property Law in Chile.

We have just learnt, although this information is yet to be officially confirmed, that the new legislation is likely to be published in the Official Gazette (and will thus come into force) by the middle of October 2005. It is therefore critical that you send us any instructions for the revalidation of foreign patents as soon as possible, to ensure that they can be validly filed before the new law comes into force.

We believe that, whilst the new law will not provide for the filing of new revalidation application, pending revalidation applications will remain valid.

Any further information on this subject will be published promptly.

30th September 2005


Saudi Arabia - Rejection of Patent Applications Based on Foreign Granted Patents filed under the Old Law

The examination of applications has now commenced, but contrary to earlier assurances by the Patent Office that the rights in all applications filed under the old law would be safeguarded, the Patent Office has started to issue notices of rejection of applications based on foreign granted patents on the grounds that the novelty requirements under the new law have not been met.

The problem would appear to be that the new law repeals the old law and there are no saving provisions for applications filed under the old law that do not meet the new registration criteria. Our associates have held numerous meetings with the Saudi Patent Office to try to find a solution, but without success. We have been advised that the only way to change the Patent Office approach would be to obtain a contrary ruling from the Appeal Committee.

Unfortunately, this can only be done on a case-by-case basis by filing a request for full examination and response to Patent Office rejection notice and subsequent appeal if the rejection is sustained. Our associates have advised that there are many other applicants in the same position, but the Committee has not yet issued a decision in this regard and our associates are therefore unable to predict the outcome of the appeal.

29th September 2005


Sao Tome and Principe - New Intellectual Property Law

We have been advised that trade mark applications are now being accepted in Sao Tome & Principe. Since 1975, when independence was gained from Portugal, there has been no effective intellectual property legislation in Sao Tome and Principe, and therefore no provision for registering these rights. However, an informal practice has evolved of publishing Cautionary Notices in local newspapers.

The Industrial Property Act is dated 04 September 2001, but the implementing regulations have only recently been published. We have been unsuccessful in obtaining the actual date of when the law came into force, but we believe this to be in the past 2 – 3 weeks.

We have yet to receive a copy of the law and regulations, but further details will be posted on the website as they become available. At the moment the details we have of the new law are very sketchy. We understand that a power of attorney is not required for the filing of a new application, but the Registrar may call for one at some stage during examination. However, at present, no example form of power of attorney has been issued by the Registry.

The publication and re-publication of cautionary notices in Sao Tome is now not a worthwhile practice, and we would therefore recommend that all those clients who have filed cautionary notices in Sao Tome in the past, apply immediately for the formal registration of their trade mark rights there.

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you require information about the cost of filing applications.

16th May 2005


St Kitts and Nevis - New Patents Act: Revalidation of granted UK/EP(UK) patents no longer possible

This article serves to update you on the situation detailed in our earlier article on this website, concerning the introduction of a new patents law in St Kitts-Nevis.

As advised previously, we have been in detailed discussions with our St Kitts associate to try and find a solution to the serious problems and inconsistencies created by the introduction of the new law, which as you will remember introduced a requirement of absolute novelty, but which did not provide any transitional provisions under which granted UK patents could still validly be registered.

In turn, our associate has taken our complaints and concerns directly to the Attorney General, who has considered our position in detail and discussed the matter with the Registrar herself. I have just been advised of the outcome of those discussions, and it appears that the Attorney General has agreed for the Registrar to use her discretionary powers under Section 58 of the current Act, to allow the continued reregistration of granted UK and EP(UK) patents until such time as St Kitts-Nevis joins the Patent Cooperation Treaty.

Section 58 of the Patents Act reads as follows:

  • (1) Where the Registrar is satisfied that the circumstances justify it, he may, upon the written request of any interested person, and upon such terms as he may direct, extend the time for doing any act or taking any proceeding under this Act and Regulations.
  • (2) The extension may be granted even though the time for doing the act or taking the proceeding has expired.
The Registrar has agreed to act accordingly, such that pending reregistration applications which have been filed since the implementation of the new law and patents granted under the new law will be considered by the Registrar to be valid. Similarly, the Registrar will continue to accept new reregistration applications which we file at the St Kitts Registry, until such time as the new Implementing Regulations are issued and/or the jurisdiction joins the PCT. In this regard, we have been advised that the necessary instruments for St Kitts’ accession to the PCT are to be prepared in due course, although it is not known how long this will take.

In view of the above developments, our associate has formally applied to the Registrar for an extension of time in respect of the filing of pending and future patent applications. However, we would point out that we do not endorse the Registrar’s view that these patents would be valid, as we do not consider the new patent law to provide any basis for the legitimate filing of patents based on published granted UK patents. Thus, whilst we will of course accept any future instructions that you may have for the filing of such reregistration applications, and forward any such Certificates of Registration to you once they have issued, we regret that we cannot endorse the validity of such patents.

It has yet to be decided whether the Registrar will introduce suitable transitional provisions in the long-awaited Implementing Regulations, or alternatively supplementary legislation, which will retroactively sanction the filing of reregistration applications in St Kitts. If such provisions or legislation are implemented, we admit that we will feel more comfortable about endorsing the validity of the patents in question. Until such time, however, we regret that we cannot consider these patents to be legally binding and authoritative.

Please note that the Regulations for the new Patents Act have still not been issued, and there is therefore still no provision for the payment of annuities. We will keep you apprised of all developments in this regard.

If you have any queries on any of the above points, please do not hesitate to contact us. Finally, please appreciate that, whilst we endeavour to ensure that our information is accurate and current, we cannot be held responsible for any misinformation or inaccuracies.

29th April 2005


Chile - New Industrial Property Law - Patents

The long-awaited Industrial Property Law No.19,996 has finally been approved in Chile and published in the Official Gazette, following a long debate by Congress. The new legislation amends the current law in order to comply with international treaties, especially TRIPS, and with the free trade agreements recently signed with the European Union and the USA.

The new law will not come into effect until its supplemental regulations are drafted and published in the Official Gazette. The current Chilean government has announced that it intends to publish these regulations by mid-2005.

This article only discusses the patent-related provisions of the new law. Should you require further information regarding other forms of intellectual property, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Of particular significance is the fact that the new patent law will no longer allow for the revalidation of granted foreign patents. We would therefore recommend that you send us any instructions for the revalidation of foreign patents as soon as possible, to ensure that they are validly filed before the new law comes into force.

Other provisions of importance in the new law include the broadening of the definition of patentable subject matter; the extension of the term of a patent from 15 years calculated from the registration date to 20 years calculated from the filing date; and the introduction of the requirement to pay annuities on an annual basis. These provisions will apply only to patent applications filed after the introduction into force of the new law.

We will obtain further clarification once the implementing regulations have issued and we have more information regarding the implications of the new law. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact us should you require any further details.

29th April 2005


St Kitts and Nevis - New Patents Act: Revalidation of granted UK/EP(UK) patents no longer possible

We have just learnt that a new Patents Act (No. 9 of 2000) came into force in St Kitts and Nevis on 1 June 2002. We regret that we have only just determined this important development, despite many months of queries, research and correspondence with various sources, and we would point out that the introduction of this new law appears to be virtually unknown – indeed, even the UK Patent Office and WIPO are apparently unaware of this significant development. We have ourselves just advised these two organisations of the news and have asked them to update their own websites, which to date still reflect the legislative provisions of the previous patent law in St Kitts.

Although we are yet to receive full and comprehensive advice on the provisions of the new law (in particular, regarding the requirement to pay annuities on old-law patents), we have managed to obtain a copy of the new law and have studied it to ascertain the implications of particular significance. We have ascertained that the Regulations for the new Patents Act have not yet been issued, despite several promises by the St Kitts Registry that they would issue “shortly”. Thus, there are several maters of great importance which cannot be resolved until these Regulations have issued.

Of particular significance is the fact that a requirement of absolute novelty has been introduced by the new law. Thus, the new law does not provide for the filing of applications for the reregistration of foreign granted patents in St Kitts. The new Act does include transitional provisions, which set a period of 12 months from entry into force of the Act during which proprietors of UK or European(UK) patents could apply for the reregistration of their patents in St Kitts, but this transitional period expired on 31 May 2003.

Notwithstanding the expiry of these transitional provisions, we would point out that the St Kitts Registry has still been issuing filing certificates in respect of those patent applications for the reregistration of granted UK patents which we have inadvertently filed in the past two years, but unfortunately it appears that these applications are actually invalid in view of the new Act. However, the apparent acceptance of these applications (which we anticipate will also proceed to grant) illustrates the uncertainty and apparent lack of understanding by the Registry officials in St Kitts.

We have also been advised that, whilst the new Patents Act applies the provisions of, inter alia, the Paris Convention, St Kitts has in fact not yet acceded to this or any other such Convention. Thus, it appears that priority cannot yet be claimed in a patent application, despite the indications to the contrary in the Act.

Our inference from the above discussions is the extremely unsatisfactory conclusion that a patent applicant cannot file an application for the reregistration of a granted UK or EP(UK) patent in St Kitts because of the new requirement for absolute novelty, but similarly cannot file a substantive application claiming priority from an earlier application. Thus, an applicant appears to have very little scope for protecting their patent rights, other than by filing a substantive application without a claim to priority before the invention is published anywhere in the world.

As you will appreciate, these matters are still very much uncertain, and we have immediately written to our associate to try and implement a safety net for applicants. In particular, we have requested that the Regulations, once issued, include a provision which retroactively extends the transitional provisions provided for in the Act under which a reregistration application based on a granted UK or EP(UK) patent could validly be filed. In this way, at least the applicant would be able to continue validly to file such reregistration applications until such time as the Regulations have been introduced, and indeed those reregistration applications which we have filed to date under the new law and which are potentially vulnerable to attack by a third party would be retroactively validated. We hope to be successful in this approach.

We summarise below some other provisions of particular significance in the new Patents Act:

Requirements for patentability An invention must now satisfy the requirements of absolute novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability, and it must not relate to “excluded” subject matter (please see below).

Exclusions from patentability The new Act lists several exclusions from patentability in St Kitts. Of particular note is the exclusion of methods of treatment of the human or animal body by surgery or therapy, as well as diagnostic methods practised on the human or animal body. This exclusion does not extend to products for use in any of these methods.

Requirements for new applications New patent applications must contain a request for grant of a patent and a specification comprising a description of the invention, a claim or claims, any drawings referred to therein, and an abstract. If the applicant is not the inventor or a joint inventor, a written statement justifying his entitlement to the rights to the patent must be filed.

Divisional applications Divisional applications may be filed at any time whilst the parent application is still pending, but must not include any matter which was not disclosed in the initial application as filed.

PCT Patent Applications The new Patents Act gives full effect to the Patent Co-operation Treaty (PCT), although St Kitts is not yet a signatory thereto.

Term of protection and payment of annuities The new Act introduces a term of protection for patents of 20 years from the filing date, subject to the payment of annuities. This term applies equally to patents which were granted under the old Act, again subject to the payment of annuities, although it is not clear whether the term of reregistration patents based on granted UK or EP(UK) patents is now considered to run from the filing date in St Kitts rather than the filing date of the base UK or EP(UK) patent. We are awaiting clarification in this regard.

Annuities are payable annually on the first and each subsequent anniversary of the filing date in St Kitts, although they can be paid within a period of grace of 6 months along with a late fine. In respect of applications based on granted UK/EP(UK) patents which were filed under the old law or during the transitional period of 1 year from the date of commencement of the new Act, we are again seeking clarification as to whether the due date for the payment of annuities is considered to be the anniversary of the UK/EP(UK) filing date rather than the anniversary of the filing date in St Kitts.

Notwithstanding the above requirements of the new law, the absence of the accompanying Regulations means that there is currently no provision for the payment of annuities. We have, however, been assured by our associate that we will be able to validly effect these payments once the new Regulations are issued.

Whilst the above situation is clearly unsatisfactory to all concerned, we regret that the St Kitts authorities do not appear to understand the havoc that they have created. We believe that the action which we are now taking is the best solution at present, but please do not hesitate to contact us should you require any further assistance. We will, of course, advise you as soon as the new Regulations have issued, and at that time we will revisit the issue of annuity payments.

If you have any queries on any of the above points, please do not hesitate to contact us. Finally, please appreciate that, whilst we endeavour to ensure that our information is accurate and current, we cannot be held responsible for any misinformation or inaccuracies.

21st March 2005


OAPI - Restoration of Priority Rights

We are pleased to report that the Restoration Regulation has been revised by the OAPI Administrative Council to recognise that priority rights lost as a result of failing to file priority documents within the time limit provided by the law, can be restored.

In the past, applications for restoration of lost priority rights based on this ground were rejected as inadmissible, but following continuous lobbying on our part and several successful appeals overturning these rejections, OAPI has finally recognised that this is a valid ground for restoration.

09th February 2005


India - Amendments to Patents Act

The Indian Patents Act has recently been amended, with effect from 1 January 2005. A summary of the more significant changes is given below:

  • Claims directed to food, drug and chemical products per se are now patentable.
  • New and non-obvious uses of known substances are now patentable.
  • Computer programmes with technical application or in combination with hardware are now patentable.
  • Any International Depository Authority established under the Budapest Treaty is now automatically recognized as an authorized depository authority.
  • Pre-grant publication of an application may be stopped if the application is withdrawn within 15 months of the filing date or the priority date, whichever is earlier.
  • An applicant is entitled to enjoy equivalent privileges to those of a patentee, as from the date of pre-grant publication of an application, except for the right to sue a third party for infringement (which right will accrue only from the date of grant of a patent). However, this privilege is not afforded to applicants of mail-box applications filed before 1 January 2005.
  • Third-party representation by way of opposition to the grant of patent on limited grounds is now only possible at the pre-grant stage of a patent application.
  • Post-grant opposition procedure before the Patent office is now available, within one year of the grant of patent, along with a procedure for the revocation of a patent.
  • A patent will immediately proceed to grant once an application is found to be in order by the Patent Office. The requirements of making a separate request for grant and the payment of a final grant fee have been abolished.
  • The mandatory requirement of registering a document affecting the title or interest in a patent (e.g. an assignment, license etc.) within one year from the date of execution of the document has been abolished. However, it is still a requirement that an agreement affecting the title or interest in a patent must be in writing in order to be considered valid, and also the provision to record the interest of the beneficiary in the Register of patents has been maintained.
  • Compulsory licences for making and exporting drugs to countries in which there is insufficient or no manufacturing capacity of the drug will be available, to address public health problems.
  • Provisions for the grant of Exclusive Marketing Rights (EMR) have been repealed.
  • Any country, group of countries or inter-conventional organization party to the WTO, PCT or Paris Convention is now automatically recognized as a convention country for the purpose of claiming priority.
  • The official fees for patent applications have been increased, and a fee is now payable in respect of complete specifications of more than 30 pages in length and for claims in excess of 10.
This summary is not a comprehensive account of the amendments made to the Indian Patents Act, but is intended to summarise some of the more significant changes which have occurred. If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact us.

04th January 2005


Bosnia & Herzegovina - Annuity payments in respect of patent applications

The Bosnian Patent Office has recently changed its policy regarding the payment of patent annuities. From now on, annuity fees will become payable on the filing date of a patent application (i.e. in respect of the first year), and annually thereafter. For PCT national phase applications, the first payment will be due on the international filing date. Previously, annuities were only payable in respect of the third and each subsequent year from the filing date.

We would point out that the Bosnian Patent Office has not issued a written statement to support this change of policy. However, in order to comply with the articles and deadlines for payment stipulated in the new Tariff of Official Fees, we would recommend that all annuities are paid in respect of the first and each subsequent year, for all pending patent applications. Back annuities must also be paid in respect of all pending applications (whether or not they were filed before the introduction of the new provisions).

At present, in view of the large number of pending applications in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Patent Office is still permitting the payment of any due annuities in response to an official invitation and without any late fine being payable, just before the grant of a patent occurs (i.e. the grant of a patent cannot occur until all due annuities are paid). Nevertheless, we would recommend that any outstanding annuities be paid as soon as possible, in view of the current uncertainties in this matter and the lack of any official policy statement. Similarly, although there is currently no official deadline for the payment of any future annuities, and notwithstanding the Patent Office’s current policy of allowing these annuities to be paid any time before the grant of a patent, we would recommend that these fees are paid annually, on each anniversary of the filing date.

We would be pleased to assist you in attending to the payment of any outstanding annuities. If you require an indication of the costs involved, please do not hesitate to contact Mrs. Sara Lloyd of our Annuities Department for further information.

09th December 2004


Ghana - New Trade Marks Act

The new Ghana Trade Marks Act (Act No. 664 of 2004), entered into force on 29 January 2004. The Act introduced a number of fundamental changes, but implementing regulations have yet to be published. The Registry is continuing to operate as far as possible using The Trade Mark Regulations L.I. 667 of 1970 (from the previous Trade Marks Act), but this has led to some confusion.

The major changes are summarised as follows:

  • Introduction of protection for service marks, became effective on 01 December 2004 as per a Notice from the Registrar General. The 8th Edition of the Nice Classification will be followed
  • The new Act makes provision for the claiming of Paris Convention priority rights.
  • Both the initial terms of protection and the subsequent renewal terms have changed from 7 and 14 years respectively to consecutive periods of 10 years. We are unsure at present whether, in the absence of the implementing regulations, whether the new term has been introduced
  • The new Act has dispensed with the terminology “registered user” and instead speaks simply of licenses. However a license is not enforceable vis a vis third parties unless it has been recorded at the Trade Marks Office.
  • A trade mark which is well-known in Ghana, may not be registered by any other person except the rightful owner of that well-known trade mark.


  • 07th December 2004


    Morocco - NEW INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY LAW effective 18 DECEMBER 2004

    We write to report that following the publication of the Implementing Regulations, the new Moroccan Industrial Property Law comes into force on 18 December 2004. The principal changes to note are as follows:-

    General

  • The existing laws of Morocco and Tangier have been repealed and the new law covers the whole territory of Morocco, including the Tangier Zone.
  • All patent, trade mark and design applications/registrations filed in Morocco or the Tangier Zone before 18 December 2004 automatically extend to the whole territory of Morocco, with effect from 18 December 2004.
  • Introduction of provisions for the protection of Layout Designs.
  • Introduction of provisions for the protection of Plant Varieties.
  • Introduction of a non-extendible deadline of 3 months from the date of filing to complete all filing formalities.
  • Increase in official fees.


  • Patents

  • Provision for the protection of pharmaceutical compositions, products and remedies including processes and apparatus to obtain them. Methods of treatment of the human or animal body, however, are excluded from protection.
  • Introduction of compulsory licences for non-working within four years from the date of filing or three years from grant (whichever is later), and Government Licences in respect of medicines, or products/processes for obtaining or manufacturing medicines, if such medicines are not made available to the public in sufficient quantity or quality, or are sold at inflated prices. Failure to work a patent is no longer a ground for revocation of patent rights.
  • Introduction of block annuity payments - annuities are payable every five years in advance, instead of annually.


  • The first annuity fee is included in the filing fee, the 2nd - 5th annuities are payable on the 1st anniversary of the filing date and the 6th - 10th annuities are payable on the 5th anniversary of the filing date and so on.

    In respect of applications and registrations filed prior to 18 December 2004, the remaining annuities due for the current five year block will be payable on the next due date after 18 December 2004.

    Designs

  • Term of protection reduced from 25 to 5 years, renewable for two consecutive five year periods.


  • Trade Marks

  • Term of protection reduced from 20 to 10 years, renewable every 10 years from the date of filing, or last renewal date. Applications for registration or renewal filed under the old law will remain in force for a 20 year term.


  • It is possible to apply for early renewal under the old law, of trade marks due between 18 December 2004 and 17 June 2005 to take advantage of the 20 year term of protection.

  • Introduction of 6 month period of grace for the payment of renewal fees.
  • Introduction of severe civil and penal sanctions for counterfeiting and infringement of registered rights.


  • If we can be of further assistance, please let us know.

    05th November 2004


    Saudi Arabia - New Ordinance on Patents, Designs and Plant Varieties

    A new ordinance on patents, industrial designs, plant varieties and layout designs came into force in Saudi Arabia on 6 September 2004. The new ordinance repeals the previous patent law, and also introduces for the first time the provision for legal protection of industrial designs, plant varieties and layout designs of integrated circuits. The law is a result of the negotiations arising during the accession of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to the World Trade Organisation, as well as the ratification of the Paris and Berne Conventions.

    A summary of the main provisions of the new ordinance are provided below:

  • A requirement of absolute novelty has been introduced in the patent law. It is therefore no longer possible to file an application for the revalidation of a corresponding foreign granted patent.
  • Convention priority can now be claimed within 12 months for patents and plant varieties and 6 months for industrial designs.
  • The term of protection of a patent is 20 years from the filing date for patents and plant varieties (except for trees and vineyards, which benefit from 25 years of protection) and 10 years for industrial designs. Layout designs of integrated circuits are afforded 10 years of protection from the filing date or from the date of commercial use, without exceeding 15 years from the date on which the design was created.
  • Compulsory licensing is provided for.
  • Annuities are now due annually in respect of patents, designs, plant varieties and integrated circuits. Anuities must be paid within three months of the first day of January of each year following the filing date of the application (previously, annuities were only payable after the grant of a patent). A further three months’ grace period is available, subject to the payment of a surcharge.
  • Infringement actions and appeals of Patent Office actions may be filed before the competent committee, and the decisions of this committee may in turn be appealed at the Board of Grievance within sixty days.
  • Please note that the Implementing Regulations in respect of this law have not yet been issued, and there are therefore many uncertainties and queries regarding the applicability of the new provisions to cases which were filed and/or granted under the previous law. We will keep you apprised of any further information that we can glean in this regard, as soon as we are able to do so.

    Please do not hesitate to contact us should you require any further information.

    02nd November 2004


    Laos - New Patent and Design Legislation

    New legislation has been introduced in Laos, with effect from 1 September 2004, which provides for the official filing of applications for patents, petty patents and industrial designs. A brief summary of these provisions is given below:

    Patents
    • Patents may be granted in Laos with respect to both products and processes.
    • Inventions must satisfy the criteria of novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability.
    • Priority may be claimed under the Paris Convention.
    • The application must be filed in the Lao language.
    • Grant of a patent is anticipated to occur around 50 months after the filing date. The Laos Patent Office will rely on the results of examination of corresponding foreign applications issued by foreign Patent Offices. The applicant should therefore provide (i) a certified copy of the results of search or examination carried out with respect to the foreign application in respect of the same invention by the relevant Foreign Patent Office; (ii) a copy of the patent granted on the basis of the foreign application in respect of the same invention or (iii) a copy of a final decision made by a Court or relevant Organization on refusal of grant of a patent for the same invention filed abroad.
    • Patents will be granted for 20 years from the filing date, subject to the payment of annuities.
    • The documentary requirements for filing a patent application are as follows:
      • Three copies of description, claims, abstract and formal drawings (if any), in English language, for translation;
      • Notarized Power of Attorney from applicant;
      • Certified copy of priority document(s) and English translation thereof (if not in English);
      • Three copies of a search report issued by any examining body of a foreign country or by any International Searching Authority in respect of the invention;
      • International Classification code in respect of the invention.


    Petty Patents
    • Petty patents may be granted in Laos with respect to devices (machines, electrical or electronic devices, tools, etc.).
    • Priority may be claimed under the Paris Convention.
    • The application must be filed in the Lao language.
    • Grant of a petty patent is anticipated to occur around 12 months after the filing date.
    • Petty patents will be granted for 7 years from the filing date, subject to the payment of annuities.
    • The documentary requirements for filing a petty patent application are as follows:
      • Three copies of description, claims, abstract and formal drawings (if any), in English language;
      • Notarized Power of Attorney from applicant;
      • Certified copy of priority document(s) and English translation thereof (if not in English);
      • Three copies of a search report issued by any examining body of a foreign country or by any International Searching Authority in respect of the invention;
      • International Classification code in respect of the device.


    Industrial Designs
    • Industrial design applications may be filed on the basis of either two dimensional drawings or photographs, or on three-dimensional forms of the design.
    • Priority may be claimed under the Paris Convention.
    • Registration of an industrial design is anticipated to occur around 6 months after the filing date.
    • Only granted designs will be the subject of publication, and this publication may be deferred during the first 12 months after the date of filing or priority claimed.
    • Industrial designs will be registered for an initial period of 5 years from the filing date, which term will be renewable for a further two consecutive periods of 5 years upon the payment of renewal fees. Annuities will apparently also be payable during the lifetime of the registration.
    • The documentary requirements for filing an application for an industrial design are as follows:
      • Four sets of drawings or photographs of the design, comprising perspective, top, bottom, front, back, right side and left side views.
      • Description of drawings or photographs, in English language;
      • Notarized Power of Attorney from applicant;
      • Certified copy of priority document(s) and English translation thereof (if not in English);
      • International Classification code under the Locarno agreement


    If you have any questions on any of the above matters, please do not hesitate to contact us.

    23rd September 2004


    Singapore - Patents (Amendment) Rules 2004

    The Singapore Patent Law has been amended with effect from 1 July 2004, with the aim of providing a more balanced and efficient system for patent applicants. Changes of particular significance are summarised below.

    • The introduction of new two-track system for examination of patent applications, and changes to the prescribed deadlines;
    • Removal of the requirement to furnish a copy of the priority document(s), unless specifically requested by Registrar;
    • Prompt publication of patent applications after 18 months from earliest priority date;
    • The introduction of more stringent conditions for grant of a patent;
    • The possibility of Patent Term Extension;
    • The possibility of post-grant search and examination;
    • Changes to the enforceability of patent rights;
    • Amendments to the grounds on which a patent can be revoked;
    • An increase in certain of the official fees, and the introduction of further official fees.
    For more details, please click on the following link :-

    Singapore Patents (Amendment) Rules 2004 (DEAD LINK - please contact admin@lysaght.co.uk)

    12th July 2004


    Singapore - Singapore Trade Marks (Amendment) Act 2004

    Singapore has made a number of amendments to its trade marks law. The new Act will come into effect on 1 July 2004, and its main provisions are as follows:-

    • The new law provides a Statutory definition of ?dilution? and expands the definitions of relative grounds to incorporate dilution as grounds for refusal of an application.
    • The term ?visually perceptible? has been deleted from the definition of trade mark, to allow registrations of sounds, smells, etc.
    • Well-known trade marks are clearly defined and protected by the amended law.
    • The Act provides a clear definition of ?counterfeit goods? & ?counterfeit trade mark?.
    • Under the new law it is only possible to claim priority from the first filed case in a Convention country, rather than any earlier application filed less than 6 months before the date of application in Singapore
    • The term of a registration runs from application date, regardless of whether priority is claimed
    • A 6 month grace period for renewal has been introduced, during which period a late fine is applicable
    • restoration possible within 6 months of removal
    • It is not necessary to record a licence for the terms of the licence to be effective against third parties
    Please do not hesitate to contact us if you require any further information concerning the new law.

    29th June 2004


    Pakistan - Registration of Service Marks

    The Trade Marks Ordinance 2001, and the Trade Mark Rules 2004, entered into force in Pakistan on 19 April 2004. Chief among the changes introduced by the new law are the introduction of service marks, and the fact that priority claims are now possible.

    27th April 2004


    Hong Kong

    We are pleased to advise that the official fees in respect of patent and industrial design matters in Hong Kong will be substantially reduced with effect from 7 May 2004.

    Applicants can take advantage of these fee reductions immediately, since a patent or design application can be filed without the simultaneous payment of the filing and advertisement fees, and these fees can then be paid within one month of the filing date of the application. In this way, an applicant can delay the payment of the filing and advertisement fees until on or after 7 May 2004, after which date the reduced fees will be applicable.

    Renewal fees in respect of patents and designs which are paid on or after 7 May 2004 will also be at a reduced rate.

    Please let us know if you have any questions in this matter.

    22nd April 2004


    Community Trade Marks - Entitlement of Channel Islands Companies to own Community Trade Marks

    The Regulations governing Community Trade Marks have been amended as of 19 February 2004. A principal effect of the amended regulations is that any company or individual may now apply for, and own, Community Trade Marks. The relevant provision (Article 5) now reads as follows:-

    ?Any natural or legal person, including authorities established under public law, may be the proprietor of a Community Trade Mark?.

    Previously, entitlement to apply to register CTMs was restricted to nationals of, and companies domiciled in, member States of the Paris Convention, which excluded applicants from Jersey and Guernsey, as well as various Caribbean jurisdictions. This was a source of much frustration for our local clients, many of whom have business interests in Europe due to our close proximity to France. We are delighted that the Community Trade Mark Office have repealed this provision after many years of lobbying from ourselves.

    31st March 2004


    Madagascar - First Trade Mark Renewals

    It has been possible to file trade marks in Madagascar since 10 August 1994 and many registrations will soon be reaching the end of their first ten year term. During this time we have maintained close links with the Madagascar Intellectual Property Office through our exclusive relationship with an authorised Madagascar agent, and we shall be pleased to assist you with the renewal of your trade marks. For more information, please contact us by e-mail at: admin@lysaght.co.uk

    17th March 2004


    Zanzibar - Adoption of the International Classification system for Trade Marks

    With immediate effect, Zanzibar has adopted the Trade Mark International Classification system (8th Edition of Nice Classification) for goods and services.

    Up until now, trade marks in Zanzibar have been classified according to Schedule III - the Pre-1938 U.K. Classification system, and only the registration of goods was possible.

    Should you, or your clients, wish to register service marks in Zanzibar, please let us know and we will send you details of the documents required and our charges.

    We are attempting to establish the exact date of the coming into force of the new rules that allow International Classification of trade marks in Zanzibar, and also how the authorities wish to treat the re-classification of existing registrations. We believe that a separate application will still be required for each class of goods/services.

    For more information, please contact Steve Le Feuvre: steve@lysaght.co.uk

    08th March 2004


    Bahrain - New Patent Law

    We have just learnt that a new patents law has recently been introduced in Bahrain, although we are yet to establish the main provisions of this new law. Furthermore, since the Implementing Regulations have yet to be issued, it is unclear of the impact that this law will have on the validity of revalidation applications based on published foreign patents. However, we anticipate that the new law may prevent the filing of revalidation patents in Bahrain, and may even invalidate revalidation patents which have already been filed and/or granted there.

    We will keep you apprised of any further information that we can ascertain in this matter.

    08th March 2004


    Nauru - Registrar of Patents

    We are pleased to advise that a Registrar of Patents has now been appointed in Nauru, and Certificates of Registration are finally being issued. We understand that registration fees are now being accepted on pending cases, and we hope that we will begin to receive the long-awaited Certificates of Registration in the near future.

    Please let us know if you have any questions in this matter.

    08th March 2004


    OAPI - Amendment of Regulation for Extension of existing rights to new territories

    On 18 December 2003, the OAPI Administrative Council passed a resolution to amend the regulation concerning the extension of rights in respect of new OAPI member states.

    An OAPI registration covers those territories that were members of OAPI at the time of filing the application for registration. The Extension Regulation of 4 December 1998 introduced procedures for the extension of an existing OAPI registration to states not originally covered by that registration, or to extend existing registered rights in a new OAPI member state, to the other OAPI states. There was a non-extendible deadline of 18 months in which to apply for the extension of rights.

    Under the revised regulation, extension of rights may now be requested at any time during the life of the existing registration, subject to the payment of a late fine if the extension application is filed more than 20 months after the date of the new member state joining OAPI. Accordingly, it will now be possible to apply for extension of rights for which previous deadlines were missed.

    Current OAPI members are:- Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea (23 Nov 2000), Gabon, Guinea (30 Jan 90), Guinea Bissau, (8 Jul 98), Ivory Coast, Mali (30 Sep 84), Mauritania, Niger, Senegal, Togo. (Dates of adhesion of new member states are indicated in brackets).

    04th February 2004


    Saudi Arabia - Revalidation of foreign granted patents

    We previously warned that the revalidation of foreign granted patents in Saudi Arabia could shortly become unallowable by virtue of an expected change to the laws there.

    We can now report that this anticipated development has indeed occurred. On 25 January 2004, the Saudi Arabian Patent Office made an announcement that, with immediate effect, it is no longer possible to revalidate foreign granted patents in Saudi Arabia. This important development has occurred in preparation for Saudi Arabia?s accession to the Paris Convention, which comes into effect from 11 March 2004. It appears that the Patent Office wished to prevent a huge influx of last-minute revalidation applications in the run-up to the date of accession to the Paris Convention, and so is refusing to accept any further such applications forthwith.

    As a consequence of this decision, non-Convention patent applications may now only be validly filed in Saudi Arabia if the invention has not been disclosed anywhere in the world prior to the filing date. However, Saudi Arabia?s accession to the Paris Convention means that, from 11 March 2004, applicants will also be able to file Convention applications (within 12 months from the earliest claimed priority date).

    With respect to existing revalidation applications and registrations, the Saudi Patent Office has assured us that these will not be jeopardised by the new changes to the law. Thus, it appears that any existing revalidation cases, whether pending or granted, will be unaffected by these changes.

    Please do not hesitate to contact us should you require any further information.

    02nd February 2004


    Cyprus - Patents - Validity of registrations based on European(UK) patents

    This article will be of particular interest to our clients with patents or patent applications in Cyprus based on EP(UK) patents.

    You may be aware that the registration in Cyprus of European patents designating the UK (hereinafter referred to as ?EP(UK) reregistration) has recently been the subject of a Supreme Court decision in Cyprus. The Court decision related to a particular EP(UK) reregistration which had been granted in Cyprus prior to the enactment of the current Cypriot Patents Law 16(1)/1998). A third party had filed an administrative recourse seeking the revocation of the patent on the grounds that it contravened the provisions of the old Patents Act Cap. 266. The Court decision held that the patent in question was invalid in Cyprus because Cap. 266 provided only for the reregistration of UK national patents, the substantive examination of which is carried out by the UK Patent Office, and did not extend to EP(UK) patents (the substantive examination of which is carried out by the EPO).

    In spite of this prejudicial decision, we wish to assure you that it does not render invalid all Cypriot EP(UK) reregistration patents granted before 1997. An Administrative Recourse decision affects only the administrative decision against which the recourse was filed (i.e. in this case, the Registrar?s decision to accept the reregistration of the specific EP(UK) patent in question). Thus, all other EP(UK) reregistration patents which were granted in Cyprus under the old law continue to be valid. The only way of attacking the validity of these patents is by filing a specific Administrative Recourse against each such registration, and this must be done within 75 days from the date of publication of the relevant administrative decision. In the case of grant of a patent, which is an administrative decision issued by the Registrar of Patents, the 75 day time limit usually commences from the date of advertisement of the patent in the Official Gazette of the Republic. Thus, in most cases, this deadline has already lapsed. The only exception would be in the case of a patent for which the Court considers the advertisement in the Official Gazette to be unclear as to the precise subject matter of the patent in question. In such a case, the crucial date for the purpose of calculating the 75 day time limit would be the date on which the complainant took notice of the granted patent.

    Should you have any questions in this regard, please do not hesitate to contact us.

    09th January 2004


    Argentina - Patents - New Rule P-225 for payment of annuities

    You may be aware that a new law (Patent Act 24481) came into force in 1995, which established a term of protection of 20 years from the application date of a patent and which required annuities to be paid at the end of the month in which each anniversary of the application date fell. Under the previous law (Patent Act 111), a term of 15 years from the grant date of a patent was provided for, and annuities were payable on each anniversary of the grant date.

    On 19 November 2003, the Argentine Patent Office issued a resolution, Rule P-225, in an attempt to normalise the payment dates of annuities in this hybrid system. According to the new resolution, which will come into force on 12 April 2004 and which will supersede all previous annuity payment regimes, annuities will become payable on each anniversary of the filing date of the patent application, beginning on the first anniversary that falls after the issuance of the notification of grant of the patent. Annuities may be paid late, within a six month grace period, but a surcharge will then also become due.

    With regard to patent applications which were granted under the old law (Patent Act 111), annuities will, to date, have been paid on each anniversary of the date of notification of grant. From now on, in view of Rule P-225, annuities will fall due on each anniversary of the application date.

    With regard to patent applications which were/are granted under the new law (Patent Act 24481), annuities will similarly fall due, in advance, on each anniversary of the application date. The first payment must be made on the first anniversary of the application date which occurs after the grant of the patent, and it must include payment of the annuities in respect of the third and each subsequent year until the year in which grant occurs. Since annuities must be paid in advance, this first payment must therefore also include that for the next anniversary of the application date. Subsequent annuities will then be payable, in advance, on each anniversary of the application date.

    Since no transitional provisions have been included in Rule P-225, we are of the opinion that annuity payments should be made in accordance with the provisions of this Rule with immediate effect, rather than as of 12 April 2004. Accordingly, please ensure that annuities are paid in advance, on each anniversary of the application date, from now on.

    We would be happy to assist you in the payment of any annuities in this regard, should you wish. Please let us know if we may be of any further assistance.

    08th December 2003


    Egypt - Increase in Official Fees for Patent Matters

    In August 2003, the Egyptian Patent Office significantly increased its official fees. For instance, the fee for filing a patent application has increased more than fourteen-fold, whilst the fee for the 20th year annuity has increased nearly seven-fold.

    Please rest assured that these increases will not be reflected in our own professional charges, nor those of our Egyptian associate, and we are therefore pleased to advise you that we are maintaining our competitive prices.

    Should you have any queries in this regard, please do not hesitate to contact us.

    24th September 2003


    Kenya - Trade Marks (Amendment) Act 2002

    It has always been our understanding that the Trade Marks (Amendment) Act 2002 would only be brought into effect after the Implementing Regulations had been published. However, as the Regulations will have a retrospective effect when they are published, the Trade Marks Registry has taken it upon themselves to issue certificates of registration and renewal indicating the term under the new law.

    However, further confusion has arisen, because of the manner in which the Registry is applying the terms of the new law. The Trade Marks (Amendment) Act 2002 is dated 23 August 2002, and when the Implementing Regulations have been published, its terms will have effect as of that date. We consider that this should mean that applications filed before 23 August 2002 were filed under the terms of the old law, and should carry an initial term of 7 years. Similarly, registrations with a renewal date before 23 August 2002 should be renewed for a period of 14 years. Any applications filed on or after 23 August 2002 should carry an initial term of 10 years, and any registrations due for renewal on or after 23 August 2002 should be renewed for 10 years.

    However, the Kenyan Trade Marks Registry has stated that ?all marks whose date of renewal was due on or before 23 August 2002 and whose application for renewal had been received at the Registry by then should be renewed for 14 years while all the rest should be renewed for 10 years" and that "all marks that have been advertised on or before 23 August 2002 should be registered for an initial period of 7 years while all the rest should be registered for an initial period of 10 years.? We cannot accept that this interpretation is correct, and we are taking issue with the Registry on the matter.

    Developments will be posted on the website as and when they occur.

    22nd September 2003


    India - Implementation of New Trade Marks Act

    We have just been advised that the Indian Trade Marks Act 1999 entered into force on 15 September 2003. The main changes to the law are as follows.

    • the introduction of service marks
    • definition of trade mark extended to include shapes, packaging and colour combinations
    • collective marks and series marks registerable
    • recognition of well known marks
    • the introduction of multi-class applications
    • alteration of renewal term to 10 years
    At the moment, we do not have a copy of the implementing rules, or of the official fees under the new law. Further information will be posted on the website as and when it is received.

    16th September 2003


    Malaysia - New Patent Term

    There has been a recent revision to the law relating to the term of patents in Malaysia, which took effect from 14 August 2003.

    Before this revision, patents were granted for a term of 15 years from the grant date, whereas now, patents will be granted for a term of 20 years from the filing date.

    In respect of patents which have been filed since 14 August 2003, the new term of 20 years from the filing date will therefore apply. With respect to patents filed before 14 August 2003, the term will be 15 years from the date of grant OR 20 years from the date of filing, whichever expires later.

    10th September 2003


    Taiwan - New Trade Mark Law

    Taiwan is to introduce a new Trade Mark Law which is due to enter into force on 28 November 2003. The new Law has been introduced as a consequence of Taiwan?s membership of the World Trade Organisation since 1 January 2002 and incorporates many provisions of TRIPS. Among the major changes will be:

  • Broader definition of a trade mark, to incorporate sounds & 3-dimensional trade marks
  • Protection for famous marks. Registration of trade marks which would dilute the distinctiveness or reputation of a famous mark is not allowed, even for dissimilar goods or services
  • Multi-class applications will be possible
  • Opposition after registration, with an unextendable term of 2 months from publication
  • Abolition of association
  • Abolition of defensive marks
  • Abolition of substantive examination on renewal and requirement to prove use on renewal
  • Registration of certification and collective trade marks will be possible. Further information about the new law in Taiwan will be posted on the website as and when it is received.

    20th August 2003


    Iraq - Resumption of Patent work

    Although the current situation in Iraq is still far from stable, the United Nations Trade Sanctions against Iraq have been lifted and patent work can therefore now resume, at least to some extent. Our Iraqi associate has confirmed that he is now in a position to receive and process work from us, and we would therefore be pleased to assist you in any such matters.

    Overdue Patent Annuities

    In respect of patents which have been granted in Iraq to date, we have been advised that the Registrar will now accept the payment of all overdue annuities which we have been prevented from paying over the last decade or so. We have been advised that the Registrar has set a deadline of 1 August 2003 for paying these outstanding annuities, but we do not expect that this deadline will be strictly enforced in view of the large number of annuities which now fall due for payment. Nevertheless, we would recommend that you provide us with your urgent instructions in respect of any patent that you wish us to revive by paying the overdue annuities.

    Please check your own records, to ensure that all of your cases are accounted for.

    Please also note that the term of patents has been increased from 15 years to 20 years, calculated from the filing date. This extension of term has apparently been in effect since 1 September 1999, and we believe that it therefore applies to any patents which had not yet expired on that date. Annuities will be payable for the entire 20 year term of a patent.

    Please let us have your instructions for the payment of any due annuities as soon as possible, to ensure that all patent rights are maintained.

    Novelty provisions

    We have received conflicting advice from several agents regarding the current novelty provisions in Iraq, and it is therefore unclear as to whether novelty of an invention must be local or worldwide. Thus, whilst it has appeared in the past that the revalidation of foreign granted patents has been possible in Iraq, we are not certain that this procedure remains a viable option.

    In this regard, we have been advised that the Iraqi Patent Law is in fact currently being revised, and it is therefore possible that the novelty provisions will be amended, probably to require absolute (worldwide) novelty in line with most other jurisdictions around the world. Again, it is not clear whether such a revision to the law will prejudice existing revalidation applications which have been filed in the past in Iraq, but our previous experience in Arab countries suggests that such revalidation applications may well be declared invalid ab initio.

    We will keep you apprised of all further developments in this regard.

    Boycott Declaration

    We have been advised that the Boycott Declaration which, to date, we have been required to submit in respect of patent applications, will no longer need to be filed. However, in view of the current situation in Iraq, we would recommend that this advice be taken with some caution, as it is subject to further confirmation.

    Requirements for filing patent applications

    The documents required for filing a patent application in Iraq are as follows:

    1. Power of Attorney legalized up to the Consulate of Iraq. Please note that the legalization stamp must appear on the back of the Power of Attorney itself, otherwise the Registrar will reject it.

    2. Eight copies of the description and claims, in English, along with an Arabic translation. We would be pleased to arrange the translation into Arabic on your behalf, if required.

    3. Eight copies of the summary of the invention in English, along with an Arabic translation. Again, we would be pleased to obtain the Arabic translation on your behalf.

    4. Eight sets of drawings, if any.

    5. An original, certified priority document, and an English translation thereof, if any.

    The Registrar may also ask for a legalized copy of the corresponding foreign basic letters patent and/or a novelty search report.

    We would be pleased to advise you on the costs involved in filing patent applications in Iraq. Should you require any further information in this regard, please let us know.

    16th July 2003


    India - Amendments to Patents Act

    The Indian Patents Act has recently been amended, with effect from 20 May 2003. Various aspects of the law have been revised, and we highlight below some of the more significant changes:

    • The definition of an ?invention? has been revised, and it is consequently no longer necessary for the claims to relate to a ?manner of manufacture? (which results in a vendible or tangible product);
    • Various categories of inventions are excluded from patentability, such as plants or animals in whole or in part; seed varieties and species; and essential biological processes for the production or propagation of plants or animals.
    • The term ?chemical process? has been extended to include biochemical, biotechnological and microbiological processes, all of which are therefore now patentable.
    • The term of protection afforded to patents has been increased from 17 to 20 years from the filing date in respect of all patents granted after, and patents which have not yet expired on, the date of commencement of the amended Act.
    • In respect of all applications filed before 20 May 2003, a request for substantive examination of a patent application must be filed within 48 months of the filing date of the application or within 12 months of the date of commencement of the amended Patents Act, whichever occurs later. For all applications filed on or after 20 May 2003, a request for examination must be filed within 48 months of the date of filing of the application.
    • All patent applications will be published after 18 months from the earliest priority date (or the filing date, if no priority is claimed).
    • An application must be put in order for acceptance within one year from the date of the first examination report. There is no provision to extend this time limit.
    • The amended Act includes the Bolar provision, which permits the use of a patented invention for obtaining drug regulatory approval from public health authorities.
    • India is now a signatory to the Budapest Treaty on the International Recognition of the Deposit of Microorganisms for the Purposes of Patent Procedures, and applicants must provide details of any such deposits made.
    • A requirement for first filing of applications in India in respect of inventions of Indian origin has been reintroduced.
    Please note that patent applications relating to pharmaceutical and agricultural products must still be filed as ?Black Box? applications, and will not be processed until after 31 December 2004. Nevertheless, Exclusive Marketing Rights (EMR) are still available in respect of such products

    This article is not a comprehensive account of the amendments made to the Indian Patents Act, but is intended to summarise some of the more significant changes which have occurred. If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact us.

    09th June 2003


    Saudi Arabia - Possible changes to Patent Law

    This article is by way of information, and is particularly relevant if (a) you have any pending Saudi Arabian patent applications based on foreign granted patents (i.e. revalidation patents), or (b) you are planning to file an application for the registration of a patent in Saudi Arabia in the future.

    We have just been in discussions with our Saudi associate who has, in turn, recently met with representatives from the Saudi Patent Office. Our associate has advised us that a new law is likely to be introduced in Saudi Arabia by the end of this year. The Patent Office has not allowed local patent agents to see a copy of the proposed new law, nor be involved in its drafting, but it has been indicated that it will no longer be possible to revalidate foreign patents under the new law.

    Furthermore, although the Saudi Arabian Patent Office has given verbal assurances to our associate that pending revalidation applications and registrations will not be jeopardised by any changes to the law that are introduced, it is not clear whether there will be any provisions to save existing revalidation applications and registrations or allow the filing of revalidation patent applications to continue for a transitional period.

    Despite the verbal assurances of the Saudi Patent Office we are concerned that, in the absence of specific saving provisions, any pending revalidation applications which are examined under the new law could be rejected as unregisterable. Indeed, an analogous situation recently arose in the jurisdiction of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), where the new law was amended to exclude revalidation patents and the new provisions have been applied to all pending applications upon examination, regardless of whether the filing date was prior to, or after the date of implementation of the revised law. This resulted in the rejection of all applications in respect of which publication of the invention had occurred prior to the filing date.

    In view of the above, we would recommend that you review your current circumstances regarding patent applications in Saudi Arabia, and take precautionary steps to ensure that applicant?s rights cannot be prejudiced, e.g. by ensuring that all future patent applications are filed in Saudi Arabia before the publication of the invention has occurred anywhere in the world.

    We will, of course, keep you apprised of any news in this matter.

    14th May 2003


    Malta - Annuity Payments

    The new Patents Act which came into force in Malta on 1 July 2002 provides that patents are granted for a term of 20 years from the effective date of the patent, subject to the payment of renewal fees. However, the Maltese Registry has only recently begun to interpret the Patents Law to the effect that the filing date in Malta is the effective date of the patent application - previously, the Registry had been considering the earliest priority date to be the effective date. We contested the previous interpretation of the new law, and we are now pleased to advise that the Registry has finally agreed to change their interpretation of the law so that it is in accordance with our own understanding.

    Thus, under the revised policy of the Maltese Registry, annuities are now payable on the fourth anniversary of the filing date of a patent application, and annually thereafter. Please note, however, that in respect of patents for which the payment of annuities had already begun before this recent change of policy, these annuity payments are to be continued on each anniversary of the earliest priority date (which was, and will continue to be, considered to be the effective date of those patents), and upon expiry of the initial 20 year term from the earliest priority date, the Registry will grant a further one year of protection to the patentee to account for the shortfall

    If you have any questions on any of the above matters, please do not hesitate to contact us.

    30th April 2003


    St. Lucia - Trade Marks Act 2001

    The St. Lucian Trade Marks Act 2001 came into force with effect from 01 April 2003. Unfortunately we had no prior warning of the coming into force of this piece of legislation, and so were unable to forewarn our clients of this change in the law ahead of time.

    The main changes introduced by the new law are as follows :-

    • The 8th Edition of the Nice Classification is now applicable in St. Lucia.
    • Applications can now be filed as multi-class applications.
    • It is no longer possible to re-register UK Trade Marks in St. Lucia
    • The renewal term is now 10 years, renewable for like periods. Any registered Trade Mark in St. Lucia will remain valid for its existing renewal term, and will then be renewable for a ten year period.
    • Trade Marks can be struck off the register on the grounds of a continuous period of 3 years non-use.
    • Convention Priority can now be claimed in St. Lucia.
    • Collective Marks and Certification Marks can now be registered in St. Lucia.
    • If an official action is raised against an application and no response is received thereto within 12 months of the date of the official action, the application will lapse.
    • Prints must be submitted in no larger than a 3 inch x 3 inch format.
    There are numerous issues about which we are in the process of seeking clarification. We will post further information on our web-site as and when it becomes available, and remain at our clients disposal for any further or specific enquiries they may have regarding the new law.

    29th April 2003


    St. Lucia - Trade Marks Act 2001

    The Trade Marks Act 2001 came into force in St. Lucia with effect from 01 April 2003. We are in the process of collating our information regarding the changes made by the new law, as we had no notice that it would be coming into effect on this date, and will send a circular to all our clients by e-mail as soon as we have the breakdown we require.

    We have been advised, however, that amongst the provisions of the new law is that it is now no longer possible to re-register existing United Kingdom Trade Marks in St. Lucia.

    As stated above, a full circular will follow as soon as possible.

    03rd April 2003


    Russia - Changes to Patent Law

    Various changes have recently been published in respect of the Russian Patent Law, which will come into force on 12 March 2003.

    Of particular significance are the following points:
    • The 20 year term of a patent relating to a pharmaceutical, pesticide, or agrochemical will now be extensible by 5 years on request by the patentee, if a licence is required to use these substances. The request for an extension of the term should be filed within 6 months from the date of the granted licence or from the grant date of the patent, whichever occurs later. This provision applies both to patents that were granted before the introduction of the new law (12 March 2003), and those granted after that date
    • It will be possible to restore a patent for which an annuity was not paid in the due time, or within the 6 month grace period thereafter. The restoration must be applied for within 3 years from the missed due date, but before the expiry date of the patent. This possibility will apply equally to patents which have lapsed before the date of introduction of the new law, provided that neither the three year restoration period nor the term of the patent have expired.
    • In respect of non-PCT derived applications, a certified copy of the priority document will now need to be filed within 16 months from the earliest priority date.
    • The term for filing a request for examination of a patent application will be extensible by 2 months. If examination is not duly requested, it will be possible to restore the application within 12 months, if a good reason for missing the due date is presented.
    • The due date for responding to an official action will not be extensible for more than 10 months, although, if a good reason can be presented, further extensions may still be possible. However, the Patent Office will take a very strict standpoint on the granting of extensions over 10 months, even if good reasons are presented, and in practice the maximum extension of time attainable will therefore be 10 months.
    • Before a final decision as to the patentability of an application is issued, a notification on the results of the substantive examination will be sent to the applicant, who will have the opportunity to respond within 6 months. This change to the law will therefore improve the rights of the patentee, since there will now be a final chance to amend the claims before the acceptance decision issues.

    Whilst these changes to the Russian Patent Law require further clarification, we hope that such clarification will be possible once the new Regulations become available.

    06th March 2003


    Paraguay - Cancellation of Trade Marks for Non-Use

    As of 01 October 2003, it will be possible to apply for cancellation of trade mark registrations for non-use in Paraguay, if it can be shown that use has not been made for 5 consecutive years.

    The law is silent on the question of whether non-use for the first 5 years, counted from the date of registration, will render the registration incurably invalid, or whether bringing the mark into use after the initial 5 year period will prevent cancellation.

    However, it remains to be seen how many trade marks will be successfully cancelled, given that Paraguay has adopted the concept of ?international use?. This means that if a Paraguay registration is challenged for non-use, proof of use of the mark within the relevant 5 year period in any country in the world will prevent cancellation. Therefore it would seem that owners of trade marks in Paraguay do not have to be concerned about the threat of cancellation proceedings, provided the trade mark in question was in use somewhere in the world during the 5 year period concerned. However, as cancellation proceedings will not be possible until October, there is no case law on the matter, and it is possible that the principle of ?international use? will be overturned.

    27th February 2003


    Hong Kong - New Trade Marks Ordinance Cap. 559

    Despite the fact that the new Rules, Fees and Work Manual have not been published, it seems that the New Trade Marks Ordinance will enter into force on 4 April 2003.

    The new law is largely, but not entirely, based upon the United Kingdom Trade Marks Act 1994. Chief amongst its provisions will be the following:-
    • Multi-class applications will be possible
    • The distinction between parts A & B of the Register will be abolished
    • The meaning of ?Trade Mark? has been broadened to allow for registration of 3 dimensional shapes, sounds, etc.
    • Recognition of ?well-known trade marks? in accordance with Article 6 bis of the Paris Convention
    • An unextendible Opposition term of 3 months from publication
    • The term of a trade mark will be 10 years, renewable for like periods
    • Registrations may be cancelled after 3 years? non-use, and the burden of proving use lies with the trade mark proprietor
    • Collective Marks may be registered

    There is nothing in the new law to suggest that Hong Kong is preparing to join the Madrid Protocol.

    Further information about the new law and its implementation will be posted on the website as and when it is received.

    17th February 2003


    Hong Kong - Patents

    Voluntary Amendment of Patents - One month time limit for the registration of court orders for amendment declared ultra vires

    Following a long battle on behalf of one of our clients, the Court of Final Appeal held that it was against the public interest and the intention of the law for the Registrar of Patents to be in a position to refuse to register a court order for amendment of a Hong Kong patent, and that the one month time limit imposed by the Regulations for the recordal of such amendments was ultra vires.

    It was confirmed that as the Hong Kong patent system was essentially a re-registration of the designated patent, the Hong Kong Patent Registry should facilitate the registration of any changes made to the designated patent.

    15th January 2003


    Mauritius - New Patents, Industrial Designs and Trade Marks Law

    The new ?Patents, Industrial Designs and Trademarks Act 2002? came into force in Mauritius on 06 January 2003. The object of the Act is to give effect to the obligations undertaken by Mauritius under the TRIPS Agreement.

    Although the new law is now in force, the supporting Regulations have not yet been prepared with the result that certain aspects of the law cannot yet be implemented.

    The main provisions of the new Act are as follows:

    Trade Marks
    • Classification - The Nice Classification, 8th edition, will apply. Multi-class applications are provided for. The repealed law did not provide for classification, so existing registrations are not classified, and we presume that these will be classified upon renewal, although the new law is silent on this.
    • Convention Priority - Priority may now be claimed under the Paris Convention.
    • Examination, Advertisement, Opposition - Provisions are retained for these. Examination for registrability has always been rigorous, and we suspect this will stay the same.
    • Term & Renewals - registrations gained under the New Act will be renewable for successive ten-year terms, instead of 7 years then successive 14-year terms under the repealed Act. Existing registrations will complete their current terms, then be renewable for ten years.
    • Use & Non-use - The new law provides for removal of a registration on the grounds of three years? non-use, up to one month before application to remove. There was no machinery for cancelling an unused trademark under the repealed law.
    • Licensing - Under the new law, licences must be recorded in order to be enforceable against third parties, and those licences must provide for quality control.
    • Remedies for Unregistered Marks - In terms of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention, marks that are well-known in Mauritius are recognised and may be enforced, even if unregistered.


    Patents
    • The conditions for patentability in Mauritius are absolute novelty (previously, only local novelty was required), inventiveness, and industrial applicability.
    • An application must also satisfy the criterion of unity of invention, although lack of unity is not a ground for invalidation of a patent. Division of an application may be carried out at any time before grant of a patent.
    • Amongst other subject matter, methods of treatment or diagnosis practiced on the human or animal body are specifically excluded from patentability in Mauritius. However, any product used in such a method is not so excluded.
    • The right to a patent belongs to the inventor, unless the invention is made during the course of an employment contract, or has been assigned or transferred by succession. Where the applicant is not the inventor, a statement justifying the applicant?s right to the patent must be furnished to the Patent Office.
    • Priority may be claimed under the Paris Convention. A certified copy of the priority document(s) may be requested by the Controller.
    • Substantive examination, as such, is not contemplated under the new Bill, but the applicant is required to furnish any details of search and examination carried out on corresponding foreign applications, if so requested by the Controller, and these will be used as the basis of the examination procedure in Mauritius.
    • The term of a patent under the new Act is 20 years from the filing date (previously, a patent expired after 14 years from the date of signature of the grant certificate, extensible by a further 14 year term upon request). Annual fees are now payable under the new Act, commencing on the first anniversary of the filing date.
    • PCT national phase applications in Mauritius are now provided for by the new Act.


    Industrial Designs
    • Industrial designs are registrable in Mauritius if they are new (and an absolute novelty requirement is specified).
    • Again, the right to an industrial design belongs to the creator, unless created during the course of employment, assigned or transferred by succession.
    • Priority may be claimed under the Paris Convention, and a certified copy of the priority document(s) may be requested by the Controller.
    • Two or more designs may be the subject of the same design application, if they relate to the same class of the International Classification or to the same set or composition of articles.
    • The registration of an industrial design expires after 5 years from the filing date, although this term is extensible for three further consecutive periods of 5 years each upon payment of a renewal fee.


    Transitional provisions
    • The term of any patent which has not expired upon entry into force of the new Act will be deemed to be the unexpired period from the date of the patent, and any patent which has been extended under the repealed Act will continue to be in force for the remainder of the unexpired period. However, annual renewal fees will be due on such patents, as provided for under the new Act. We are currently investigating whether back annuities will therefore become payable, or whether only those annuities which fall due after the entry into force of the new Act are payable..


    This information is correct to the best of our knowledge, but only represents an overview of the new Acts. Please let us know if you require any more detailed information.

    10th January 2003


    Belize - Revised Patents Act (cont'd)

    We are pleased to advise that, due to our excellent relations with the Registry in Belize, the requirement for the use of a local agent in Belize which was introduced by the new law has recently been dispensed with by the Deputy Registrar, at least for the time being. We are therefore able to minimise our costs in the filing and prosecution of cases by acting directly before the Registry.

    13th November 2002


    St. Kitts & Nevis - New Trade Marks Act

    We have just been advised by our associate in St. Kitts that the Marks, Collective Marks and Trade Names Act 2000 came into force in St. Kitts on 01 June 2002. It introduces major changes to the system for registering Trade Marks in St. Kitts, key points including :-

    • Definition of trade mark expanded to "any visible sign"
    • International Classification adopted - it is assumed that existing registrations will need to be reclassified upon renewal.
    • Priority claims possible.
    • Duration 10 years and renewable for like periods.
    • Cancellation possible after 3 years? non-use.
    • Collective marks registerable.
    • Licensing possible only if proprietor exercises quality control.
    • Registration of UK registrations is being phased out, and will no longer be possible after 31 May 2003. Trade Marks re-registered between now and 31 May 2003 will be valid for the unexpired portion of the period of protection afforded for the UK mark, and we are investigating what provisions exist to convert these marks (presumably upon renewal) so that they conform with the new act.
    • Formal Trade Mark examination is now undertaken, and marks are published for opposition purposes.
    • The transitional provisions, which seem to suggest that the term of all existing registrations has been reduced from 14 to 10 years, are currently being queried, as are the documentary requirements.
    Further information, including confirmation of how (if at all) this will affect Lysaght & Co.'s charges for Trade Mark Registration in St. Kitts & Nevis will be posted on our web-site, as and when it is received.

    If you have any questions or queries in the interim, please do not hesitate to contact us.

    4th November 2002


    Anguilla - New Patents Act

    A new Patents Act has recently come into force in Anguilla, with effect from 12 August 2002. The revisions to the law have brought it into compliance with the provisions of the GATT TRIPS Agreement.

    The main provisions of the new Patents Act are as follows:

    • Patents may only be granted in respect of inventions which satisfy the criteria of novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability. Previously, patent applications were not examined on substantive grounds, but were merely advertised for opposition by any interested third party. Under the new Act, applications are examined on both formal and substantive grounds.
    • The novelty requirement is absolute (worldwide), although disclosures within the 12 months immediately preceding the filing date/earliest priority date which result from acts committed by the applicant or his predecessor in title, or acts which constitute an abuse by a third party, are discounted.
    • Methods of treatment, diagnosis or therapy are excluded from patentability.
    • Patents are granted under the new Act for a term of 20 years from the filing date, and annuities are now due in respect of the second and each subsequent year from the filing date. A grace period of six months is provided for the late payment of annuities.
    • The reregistration of granted UK and European (UK) patents is still possible under the new law, within three years from the date of grant of the base patent.
    • The transitional provisions of the new law render it applicable to all granted patents and all pending applications. We are currently checking whether annuities will therefore become payable on patents which were granted under the old Act, and we will post further details when we have received clarification of this point.

    24th September 2002


    Anguilla - New Trade Marks Act

    The Trade Marks Act 2001 came into force in Anguilla on 12 August 2002. Chief amongst its provisions are the following:

    • Definition of Trade Mark expanded to UK 1994 Act definition.
    • International Classification adopted - existing registrations to be reclassified upon renewal.
    • Priority claims possible.
    • Duration 10 years with 6 month grace period.
    • Cancellation possible after 3 years? non-use.
    • Collective marks registerable.
    • Licensing possible only if proprietor exercises quality control.
    • Agent in Anguilla needed.
    • Re-registration of UK registrations still possible, but will be examined and may be refused if the mark is a geographical name, surname, flag or crest connected with Anguilla, or if it conflicts with a trade mark ?which is well known in Anguilla for identical goods and services of another enterprise?.
    The transitional provisions, which seem to suggest that the term of all existing registrations has been reduced from 14 to 10 years, are currently being queried, as are the documentary requirements.
    Further information will be posted on this website when it is received.

    If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

    19th September 2002


    Malta - New Patents Act

    A new Patents Act has recently come into force in Malta, with effect from 1 July 2002. We have been attempting to clarify several provisions of the new law with the Maltese Registrar. Unfortunately, we are yet to receive satisfactory clarification of certain issues which we have raised, but we will post any further information of note on this website as soon as we can.

    Of particular significance in the new law are the following points:

    • Requirement for local agent if an Applicant does not have his ordinary residence or place of business in Malta;
    • Excess claims fee for each additional claim over 10;
    • Exclusion from patentability of claims directed to methods of treatment by therapy or surgery and methods of diagnosis of a human or animal body;
    • New patent term of 20 years from the filing date, subject to the payment of renewal fees, and no further extension of term provided for;
    • Renewal fees due annually, commencing before expiration of the second year from the filing date, or within a six month period of grace thereafter;
    • New documentary requirements for filing an application.
    Click here for the full story (DEAD LINK - please contact admin@lysaght.co.uk)

    If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

    22nd August 2002


    India - Implementation of New Trade Marks Act

    The Indian Trade Marks Act 1999 is expected to be implemented shortly. Chief among the provisions of the new law are the following changes:-

    • the introduction of service marks
    • definition of trade mark extended to include shapes, packaging and colour combinations
    • collective marks and series marks registerable
    • recognition of well known marks
    • the introduction of multi-class applications
    • alteration of renewal term to 10 years.
    We understand that the official fees have yet to be finalised, so at present, we cannot give an accurate estimate of our charges for filing an application under the new law. However, if you have any trade marks that you wish to register in the service classes, we recommend that you send your instructions to us as soon as possible. We will then prepare instructions so that your applications are filed on the first day that the new law is implemented.

    We look forward to hearing from you.

    20th August 2002


    Ukraine - Patents - Extension of Term of Patents relating to medical and pharmaceutical subject matter

    As from 27 May 2002, a new procedure has come into effect in the Ukraine which provides for the possibility of extending the term of certain patents.

    The procedure enables the term of patents relating to medical products and products for the protection of animals or plants, the use of which requires the permission of an appropriate Ukrainian competent authority, to be extended upon the request of the patent proprietor. The term can be extended for a period which equals the time which has elapsed between the filing date of the patent application and the date of obtaining such permission. The extension cannot, however, exceed 5 years.

    In order to extend the term of a patent under this provision, the patentee must file an application for patent term extension not later than 6 months before the date of expiration of the normal term of the patent. The following documents and information are required:

    • Patent number;
    • Filing date and application number of patent;
    • Title of invention;
    • Name and address of patent proprietor;
    • Certified copy of a document which grants permission to the patentee to use the product or process, issued by a competent Ukrainian authority (e.g. copy of registration certificate issued by Ministry of Health, etc.);
    • Power of Attorney.
    Applications for extension are examined within one month of the application filing date and, if an application meets the formal requirements, the Ukrainian Patent Office will issue a certificate of extension, which is considered to be part of the original patent. A notice is also published in the Official Bulletin entitled ?Industrial Property? in the Ukraine.

    If you require any further information in this regard, please do not hesitate to contact us.

    10th July 2002


    St Vincent and the Grenadines - Accession to PCT

    St Vincent and the Grenadines will become a party to the Patent Co-operation Treaty (PCT) on 6 August 2002. Whilst the local patent law in St Vincent is not expected to be finalised until some time after September 2002, when the new session of Parliament commences, we believe that it will then no longer be possible to reregister granted UK/EP (UK) patents in St Vincent and the Grenadines.

    Please therefore ensure that you send us any instructions for the reregistration of patents in St Vincent and the Grenadines as early as possible, to ensure that we have sufficient time to process your instructions before the law changes.

    05th July 2002


    OAPI - Extension of registrations to Equatorial Guinea

    Please note that the deadline for extension to Equatorial Guinea of trade mark, patent and design registrations filed at OAPI prior to 23 November 2000, expires on 23 May 2002.

    Documents Required:
    • Power of attorney simply signed
      Photocopy of:
    • Certificates of registration/renewal
    • Certificate of recordal of any changes to the proprietor, or details when such changes were recorded

    22nd April 2002


    Laos - Introduction of Single Class Registration System

    The People?s Democratic Republic of Laos continues to buck international trends and has now abolished multi-class applications. As of 11 March 2002, only single class applications will possible. Existing multi-class registrations will be split upon renewal.

    28th March 2002


    Hong Kong - New Trade Marks Ordinance

    After years of delay, the Hong Kong Trade Marks Registry has announced that they expect the new Trade Marks Ordinance to come into effect in January 2003. However, this date is subject to change.

    It is expected that the new law will be broadly based upon the UK Trade Marks Act 1994. Major changes will include the abolition of parts A and B of the Register, the introduction of multi-class applications and the reduction of the renewal term to 10 years. Further information will be posted on this website as and when it becomes available.

    28th March 2002


    Jordan - New Patent Regulations

    On account of the new patent regulations which entered into force in Jordan with effect from 13 December 2001, various changes have been made to the documentary requirements for filing patent applications. In order to file a patent application in Jordan, the following documents are now required:

    Document(s) Required - [Deadline For Filing]

    Three copies of the specification and claims in English - [English version required for filing date]
    Three copies of the specification and claims in Arabic - [Within 60 days from the filing date]
    Drawings, if any, in triplicate - [Required for filing]
    Power of attorney, notarized and legalized up to the level of Jordanian Consulate- [Within 60 days from the filing date]
    Declaration supplemented by oath, signed by the inventor(s), notarized and legalized up to the Jordanian Consulate - [Within 60 days from the filing date]
    Certified copy of Certificate of Incorporation of applicant company, or copy of Establishment of Memorandum of Association if applicant is a juridical person- [Within 60 days from the filing date]
    Certified copy of document establishing applicant's right in the invention (if Applicant is not inventor(s) - [Within 60 days from the filing date]
    Certified copy of priority application , if priority is claimed- [Within 60 days from the filing date]

    Language requirements
    All documents should be accompanied by an Arabic translation if they are written in English, and by an Arabic and English translations if they are written in another language. Our associate can prepare the necessary Arabic translations of the documents as required.

    Methods of Treatment Methods of treatment by therapy or surgery and methods of diagnosis of a human or animal body are not patentable in Jordan, and should therefore be either deleted from an application or amended to conform with local requirements.

    Annuity Payments Annuity fees are only payable after grant of a patent in Jordan.

    This information is correct to the best of our knowledge, but please bear in mind that there is still some confusion in Jordan as to the definitive requirements of the law. Any further information that we receive in this regard will be posted on this website at our earliest opportunity.

    28th March 2002


    OAPI - Adoption of 8th Edition of the International Classification of Trade Marks

    The Director General of OAPI has confirmed that the 8th Edition of the International Classification of Trade Marks has been adopted as of 1 January 2002. This divides service class 42 into 4 separate classes as follows:-

    Class 42 Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto; industrial analysis and research services; design and development of computer hardware and software; legal services.

    Class 43 Services for providing food and drink; temporary accommodation.

    Class 44 Medical services; veterinary services; hygienic and beauty care for human beings or animals; agriculture, horticulture and forestry services.

    Class 45 Personal and social services rendered by others to meet the needs of individuals; security services for the protection of property and individuals.

    We understand that OAPI intend to reclassify existing class 42 registrations upon renewal.

    10th January 2002


    United Kingdom - Amendments to Registered Designs Act

    The Registered Designs Regulations 2001 came into effect on 9 December 2001, and have introduced various amendments to the Registered Designs Act 1949 in the UK. The Regulations bring the UK Act into line with EC Directive 98/71/EC, which attempts to harmonise the essential features of the national laws relating to the protection of designs by registration in the European Economic Area (EEA).

    The EC Directive ( and so the Registered Designs Regulations 2001 in the UK) have brought about changes which predominantly affect the criteria for enabling registration of a design. The main changes are noted briefly below, but these comments are not intended to be a definitive guide on the revised provisions. For more information on this topic, please do not hesitate to contact our office.

    What can be registered?

    A wider definition of the ?designs? which can be registered has now been introduced. Thus, ?designs? no longer need to be aesthetically appealing in order to be registrable. Also, parts of products (e.g. the lid of a teapot) can be registered alone, so long as they are visible in the finished product. However, a design will only be registrable if it has ?individual character? - this is a new requirement in the UK.

    Absolute Novelty requirement

    A requirement of absolute (not just local) novelty now exists.

    Industrial application no longer required

    The ?design? may now be a single design, so need not be applied to a minimum of 50 items as was previously required.

    Design no longer dependent on product to which it is applied

    It is now the design itself which is registrable, and so liable to be infringed - previously, registration afforded protection to the design as applied to a particular product, so infringement would only occur if that design was used in conjunction with the particular product in respect of which it was registered.

    12 month Grace Period

    A new 12 month grace period has been introduced, which means that a designer can freely disclose his design so long as an application for registration of the design is filed within 12 months of the date of first disclosure.

    Term of Protection

    In respect of ?pre-1989 registrations? - i.e. designs filed before 1 August 1989 and still in effect or capable of being treated as such when the Regulations came into force in the UK - a term of protection of 25 years is now accorded to registered designs. Therefore, designs which previously had a 15 year term now have this term extended to 25 years from the filing date. However, a registration which has expired under the old terms of the Act, before the new Regulations came into force, cannot be revived by virtue of this provision.

    Renewal Payments

    Renewal fees are still due at five yearly intervals, but they are now calculated from the filing date, rather than the priority date, of the application. In effect, there will therefore be up to an additional 6 months of protection for designs with priority claim(s), compared with the situation previously.,

    04th January 2002


    OAPI - Revised Bangui Accord enters into force on 28 February 2002

    The Bangui Accord, which governs intellectual property protection in the OAPI territories (Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Ivory Coast, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Senegal and Togo), has been revised to ensure compliance with TRIPS, as well as introducing a number of other changes. The new law comes into force with effect from 28 February 2002.

    PRINCIPAL CHANGES

    Trade Marks
    • Proof of use will no longer be required on renewal. This applies to all renewal applications filed on or after 28 February 2002, including renewals which have passed their due date and are filed in the 6 month grace period.
    • A mark becomes vulnerable to an action for cancellation if it has not been used for an uninterrupted period of 5 years prior to the action for cancellation, instead of 5 years from its registration date.
    Patents
    • The patent term will be extended to 20 years in respect of all registered patents, and application for extension of term beyond 10 years will no longer be required. This includes patents which have reached their ten year term but are still in the extension grace period at the time the revised law comes into force.
    • PCT applications will be subject to a technical examination, from which they were previously excluded.
    General
    • There will no longer be a 12 month time limit for recording changes to the proprietor.
    • Licence agreements and deeds of assignment between nationals of OAPI territories and non-nationals will no longer require the approval of the Competent National Authority.
    • Introduction of protection for Layout-Designs of Integrated Circuits and Plant Varieties.>

    03rd January 2002


    Singapore - Protection of UK Registered Designs - New Provisions

    With effect from 9 December 2001, the implementation of an EC Directive (98/71/EC) will cause some changes to the protection of UK Registered Designs in Singapore, which correspond to the changes recently introduced in the UK by virtue of the new UK Design Regulations. The main changes are outlined below:

    TERM OF PROTECTION In respect of ?pre-1989 registrations? - i.e. designs filed before 1 August 1989 and still in effect or capable of being treated as such when the Regulations came into force in the UK - the EU Directive (and consequently the new UK Design Regulations) now requires a term of protection of 25 years to be accorded to registered designs, so that designs which previously had a 15 year term now have this term extended to 25 years from the filing date. However, a registration which has expired under the old terms of the Act before the new Regulations came into force cannot be revived by virtue of this provision.

    Designs which fall into this category will similarly enjoy an extension of the term of protection from 15 years to 20 years under the Singapore Registered Designs Act 2000.

    RENEWAL PAYMENTS In the UK, under the new Regulations, renewal fees are due at five yearly intervals, calculated from the filing date rather than the priority date of the application. Similarly, the Singapore Registry will adopt such a practice, so that the next renewal date will be calculated from the filing date in the UK, not the priority date. In effect, there will therefore be up to an additional 6 months of protection, for designs with priority claim(s), compared with the situation previously.

    Note that this change only applies to the renewal of UK registered designs, not Singapore-filed design applications.

    31st December 2001


    Taiwan - Revised Patent Law

    The Patent Law in Taiwan has recently been revised, with effect from 26 October 2001. The main points of significance are as follows:

    Minimum requirements for obtaining filing date A filing date will in future be accorded to a patent application when the official fee, specification and drawings have been submitted to the Patent Office in Taiwan. Other documents (the required oath and assignment, power of attorney and priority documents, if applicable) can be furnished after the filing date. If the specification and drawings are in a language other than Chinese, the Patent Office will set a term within which a Chinese translation must be filed.

    Claiming priority Until now, Taiwan has had only restricted provisions for claiming priority. The revised law brings Taiwan into compliance with the Paris Convention, although the revision is yet to be enforced. A system of internal priority has also been introduced, to the effect that priority can be claimed from an application which was previously filed in Taiwan.

    A certified copy of the priority document(s), where applicable, must be filed within three months of the filing date in Taiwan.

    Publication of applications Patent applications will now be open to public inspection after 18 months (presumably calculated from the priority date, although this is not clear), assuming that the application has passed the formalities examination. Early publication may be requested, if required.

    Substantial examination Substantial examination may be requested within three years of the filing date of a patent application. If a request is not duly made, the application will be deemed to have been withdrawn.

    12th December 2001


    Indonesia - New Trade Mark Law

    A new trade mark law has been in effect in Indonesia since 1 August 2001. The act makes a number of procedural changes to the existing law, in order to comply with TRIPS.

    The most significant change for existing trade mark owners is in respect of the renewal term. Whilst the term of a registration is still 10 years, previously a renewal application had to be filed no later than 6 months before the expiry of the mark. Under the new law, renewal applications can be filed at any time during the final 12 months before the expiry date, up to and including the expiry date itself. This provision is retrospective, applying to all registered marks as well as new applications.

    Other changes to the law include:-

    • A reduction in the Opposition term from 6 to 3 months;
    • Substantive examination will take place before, rather than after, the Opposition term. Additionally, the right to appeal against the Trade Mark Office?s rejection of a mark has been introduced;
    • Applications claiming priority will no longer lapse if the priority documents are not filed within the relevant period (within 9 months of the filing date of the priority case) but will be treated as ordinary applications with no priority claim;
    • A greater emphasis on the prohibition of marks filed in bad faith; Greater protection for well-known marks, including the right of the Trade Mark Office to refuse to renew any registration which is similar or identical to a well-known mark.

    12th December 2001


    Belize - Revised Patents Act (cont?d)

    There are several differences between the previous Act and the revised Act, which have implications for any new or existing patent applications or granted patents in Belize.

    Novelty There is now a requirement of absolute novelty in Belize. Thus, for all new applications apart from re-registration patent applications filed under the transitional provisions of the revised Act (see below), the subject invention must not have been disclosed anywhere in the world, in any way, before the filing date (or priority date, if applicable) of the Belize application.

    Re-registration applications In connection with the new requirement of absolute novelty, and as reported previously, the revised law does not provide for the filing of applications for revalidation of foreign granted patents in Belize. However, the transitional provisions of the revised Act do allow a window of a year from the date of commencement of the revised Act, in which time proprietors of foreign UK or European(UK) patents can apply for revalidation of their patents.

    We previously believed the transitional provisions to expire on 31 December 2001, but it now appears that this date will be 4 January 2002. However, we ask that you kindly provide us with any instructions at least a month before that date, whenever possible, so that we can ensure that applications are put on file in Belize before expiry of the transitional provisions.

    Exclusions from patentability The revised Act lists several exclusions from patentability in Belize. Of particular note is the exclusion of methods of treatment of the human or animal body by surgery or therapy, as well as diagnostic methods practised on the human or animal body. This exclusion does not extend to products for use in any of these methods. We therefore suggest that claims relating to methods of treatment be drafted in the form: ?Substance X for use in a method of treating disease Y? (in cases where Substance X has not been disclosed for use in the treatment of any such method in the prior art), or as Swiss-style claims (?Use of Substance X in the manufacture of a medicament for treating disease Y?).

    PCT Patent Applications The revised Patents Act explicitly implements and gives full effect to the Patent Co-operation Treaty (PCT), so that PCT national phase applications in Belize will now be processed. Previously, such applications were accepted, but were simply accorded a filing date and held in abeyance in anticipation of the revised law.

    Please note that, although PCT national phase applications will now be processed in Belize, it is likely that the prosecution may be slow, since the Registry is relatively unfamiliar with the PCT procedure.

    The international filing date is counted as the effective filing date for all national phase applications which are validly filed in Belize before the deadline of 21 months (Chapter I) or 31 months (Chapter II) from the earliest priority date.

    Divisional applications Divisional applications may be filed at any time whilst the parent application is still pending, but must not include any matter which was not disclosed in the initial application as filed.

    Term of protection and payment of annuities The revised Patents Act introduces a term of protection for patents of 20 years from the filing date, subject to the payment of annuities. This term also applies to patents which were granted under the old Act, and such patents will therefore remain in force for the unexpired portion of the term provided for under the revised Act, again subject to the payment of annuities.

    In respect of applications filed under the new Act (i.e. since 5 January 2001), annuities are payable annually on the anniversary of the filing date in Belize, although they can be paid late, within a period of grace of 6 months, along with a late fine. In respect of applications based on granted UK/EP(UK) patents filed during the transitional period of 1 year from the date of commencement of the revised Act, the date of filing in Belize will be deemed to be the UK/EP(UK) filing date. We assume that in such cases, however, annuities only become payable after the date that the application was lodged at the Registry.

    The requirement to pay annuities also applies to applications filed and registrations granted under the old Patents Act. Such annuities are payable from the date of grant in Belize - on the anniversary of the UK/EP(UK) filing date in respect of re-registrations, and on the anniversary of the filing date in Belize in respect of substantive applications.

    Utility Models The revised Act provides for the grant of utility model certificates in Belize, which have a seven year term calculated from the filing date. The requirements for a utility model application are less stringent than those for a full patent - the invention must simply be new and industrially applicable in order to qualify for the former type of protection.

    Representation The revised Patent Law requires foreign applicants to be represented by an attorney-at-law who is resident and practising in Belize. However, the Registrar has used his discretion to waive this requirement for the time being, such that we are able to continue representing foreign applicants. Nevertheless, we may still require the services of a local agent in the case of urgent deadlines, for the purpose of paying the official fees due or filing urgent documents.

    If you have any queries on any of the above points, please do not hesitate to contact us.

    27th September 2001


    Slovenia - New Law on Industrial Property

    A new Law on Industrial Property has recently been adopted by the Slovenian Parliament, which will enter into force on 7 December 2001. The two main provisions of relevance to patent matters are set out below.

    PCT National Phase Applications in Slovenia From 7 December 2001, direct national phase applications of PCT applications will no longer be possible in Slovenia. Therefore, in respect of any PCT application with an international filing date later than 7 December 2001, Slovenia can only be reached by extension of a European (ep) patent to Slovenia. This means that both Slovenia and EP must be designated on the PCT application form. Also, because Slovenia is not yet a full Member State of the European Patent Convention (epc), only an extended member, an ep application must designate at least one Member State of the EPC in order to enable extensions to be effected.

    Document of Evidence (DOE) Currently, in order for a granted Slovenian patent to become enforceable in court, and to extend the duration of the term of protection from 10 years to 20 years calculated from the filing date, written proof known as the Document of Evidence (DOE) must be submitted to the Slovenian Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) and a fee must be paid. The DOE must prove that the patented invention fulfils the substantive requirements of novelty, inventive step and industrial susceptibility.

    The new law imposes stricter rules regarding the DOE. According to the new rules, a Slovene translation of a granted EP patent for the same invention will take preference, so that this must be filed as the DOE if it exists. The new rules require that the complete specification must be translated and submitted as the DOE, not simply the patent claims (as were required under the old rules). If an EP application has not been filed, the DOE must comprise a Slovene translation of the complete patent granted for the same invention by an authority having the status of International Preliminary Examining Authority (IPEA) under Article 32 of the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). A list and copies of all other patents for the same invention which could be considered as the DOE, including particulars of the patent applications and patents which have been refused, must accompany that document.. If neither an EP patent nor a corresponding patent granted by an office having the status of IPEA exists, the proprietor may request SIPO to obtain relevant date or opinions from any of the authorities or offices listed above, and this document will be considered to be the DOE.

    These new rules will apply for all DOEs submitted after 7 December 2001. We therefore recommend filing the DOE before this date, wherever possible, in order to benefit from the less stringent requirements of SIPO. In any case, we recommend filing a European patent as the DOE, since this is generally the most reliable and cost-effective way of obtaining an enforceable Slovenian patent.

    27th September 2001


    Barbados - New Patents Act

    A new Patents Act has recently come into force in Barbados, which repeals and replaces the former law.

    PCT provisions The main difference between the new and old Acts is that the new Act introduces explicit provisions for the filing and processing of PCT national phase patent applications. Although PCT national phase applications have been acceptable in Barbados for some time, there was no detailed written provision for such in the old Act. The new Act remedies this deficiency.

    Term of protection In addition, the new Patents Act amends the term of granted patents.

    Under the previous Act, patents were granted for a term of 15 years from the filing date, subject to the payment of annuities. A five year extension could then be obtained, if it could be shown that the invention was being sufficiently worked in Barbados, or if circumstances justifying non-use existed.

    Under the new Act, a patent is granted for 20 years from the filing date, again subject to the payment of annuities (for discussion of which, see below). This provision applies to all pending applications, either which were filed before the new Act came into force (6 August 2001) or which have been filed subsequently.

    The longer term also applies to patents which were granted under the former Act. In other words, a patent granted under the former Act will remain in force for 20 years from the filing date of the application, subject to the payment of renewal fees.

    Annuities Under the former Act, annuities were payable ?beginning with the second year after the filing date?, and ?before the end of each year?. Our advice to clients until now has therefore been that annuities become due at the start of the second year from the filing date, and are validly payable without penalty at any time prior to the expiry of that year. We have therefore, until now, paid annuities close to the second anniversary of the filing date, and annually thereafter, i.e. towards the end of the period in which each annuity can be validly paid.

    However, the new law is worded slightly differently, to the effect that annuities ?shall be paid in advance to the Director for each year, starting one year after the filing date of the application?. We have therefore decided that, in future, our policy will be to pay annuities at the start of each renewal year, not towards the end, since the first due annuity (for the second year) becomes payable on the first anniversary of the filing date. Our letters reporting the filing details of applications will, in future, reflect this change in our policy.

    18th September 2001


    Belize - New Patents Act

    We have just learnt that the Patents Act in Belize has been revised, with the revised law having effect from 31 December 2000.

    Although we have yet to fully study the revised law and to ascertain the main implications of the changes, we should advise that a requirement of absolute novelty has been introduced by the revisions. Thus, the revised law does not provide for filing applications for revalidation of foreign granted patents in Belize.

    However, the revised Act does include transitional provisions, which set a period of 12 months from entry into force of the revised Act, during which proprietors of foreign UK or European(UK) patents may apply for revalidation of their patents. The transitional period expires on 31 December 2001, and applications for revalidation of UK/EP(UK) patents will therefore cease to be acceptable after this date.

    The revised Act also introduces the requirement that a local agent must be used for all matters carried out on behalf of a foreign Applicant. We will consequently no longer be able to act directly before the Belize Registry, and we therefore anticipate that our charges for filing a re-registration application will, in the future, amount to approximately £500.00 sterling, including official fees, our professional fees, and the fees of our local associate in Belize, although this is subject to confirmation.

    A more detailed analysis of the revised Patents Act will follow shortly, but any instructions for revalidating a granted UK/EP(UK) patent should be sent to us as soon as possible so that we can file the application in good time before expiration of the transitional provisions.

    07th September 2001


    Belize - New Trade Marks Act

    The New Trade Marks Act became effective 05 January 2001 but the mechanics for putting this law into effect only became apparent a few weeks ago when the Registrar wrote to all attorneys on the matter. We are still endeavouring to establish the full details and implications of the new law, and we have found potential discrepancies and contradictions between the Act, the Rules and Fees Schedule. We have posed some searching questions to the Registrar, and we are awaiting his response.

    One definite development with the introduction of the new law is that we can no longer file applications direct with the Registry, and therefore we have engaged the services of a local law firm who will process applications on our behalf at an extremely attractive preferential rate due to the overall volume of applications we can supply in any given year. This local law firm is now acting on our behalf in pressing the Registrar to explain how the new law will be interpreted.

    As soon as we are sure that all our questions have been answered, we will post more information about the new law on this page, but for the time being we do have the following to report about the new law:
    • The new law introduces an independent trade mark registration system, and therefore it will no longer be necessary to base Belize applications on a registered U.K. national trade mark.
      (However, there is a transitional period which expires on 05 January 2002, during which time applications can be made in Belize for the re-registration of existing U.K. national registered trade marks. Such applications shall be afforded the filing date or priority date accorded to the application by the U.K. Patents Office. Our charges for applications filed under the transitional provisions will be set once we have received clarification from the Registrar as to the procedure and fees involved)
    • Trade marks are registered for a term of 10 years from the date of filing in Belize, and can be renewed for further like periods of 10 years.
    • International Classification of Goods and Services applies.
    • Whilst it was envisaged that a ?multi-class? registration system was to be introduced in Belize, neither the Act, the Rules or the Fee Schedule reflect this. Therefore, until this point is clarified and the appropriate measures taken by the Belize authorities, it must be assumed that an application for a trade mark will cover only one class of goods or services.
    • Trade Marks registered under the old law are automatically in force under the New Act.

    31st August 2001


    Jamaica - New Trade Marks Law

    We have been advised that the Trade Marks Act 1999 will come into effect on September 3, 2001. The Act repeals and replaces the Trade Marks Act, 1958 and provides for the following :-
    • registration of service marks
    • registration of certification and collective marks
    • filing of multiclass applications
    • registration of "signs", including three-dimensional shapes, sounds, smells, colour, packaging
    • protection of well-known marks originating in Paris Convention member countries
    • claiming of the right of priority of registrations originating in Paris Convention member countries
    • licensing and sub-licensing of marks
    • simplification of the assignment process
    • registration of transactions affecting registered marks, including security interests
    • protection of registered marks for 10 years and renewals for further periods of 10 years
    • extension of opposition period from 1 month to 2 months but extensions of time will not be available
    • elimination of defensive marks
    • elimination of the association requirement
    • retroactive consolidation of the register (i.e. fusing of Parts A and B)
    • expansion of infringement rights. A registration is infringed by use of same or similar marks on the same or similar goods or services
    • criminalisation of counterfeiting
    • apprehension and forfeiture of infringing goods imported into the country.
    Further details on this piece of legislation will be posted on our web-site as and when they are available.

    31st August 2001


    Belize - New Trade Marks Law

    We have just discovered that a new Trade Marks Act was passed in Belize earlier this year, although its provisions are only just being implemented. The new law is substantive; it will no longer be necessary to base applications on national UK registrations.

    Previously the only protection that could be obtained for trade marks which were not registered in the United Kingdom was by means of a Cautionary Notice. The Registrar has indicated that under the new law, trade marks which have been the subject of Cautionary Notices published in the last 10 years will be given priority for a limited period. This will probably be until the end of 2001, but official confirmation of this has yet to be received.

    At the moment we have scant information about the new law, but we will update the website as and when more information becomes available.

    22nd August 2001


    Paraguay - New Patent Law

    A new Patent Law entered into force in Paraguay on 29 January 2001, and the implementing Regulations are due to be enacted shortly.

    The principle provisions of the new Patent law are as follows:
    • Patents will be granted for patents of invention and utility models. It is no longer possible to apply for revalidation of foreign granted patents.
    • The term of a patent of invention is 20 years from the date of filing, and for a utility model, 10 years from the date of filing.
    • Annuities are payable annually, in advance, in respect of all patents and patent applications commencing on the second anniversary of the filing date (i.e. for the third year). There is a period of grace of 6 months, with penalty.
    • In respect of applications filed or registered under the old law, annuity payments will commence with the annuity due after 29 January 2001. The filing date of patents of revalidation is deemed to be the filing date of the corresponding foreign patent. Any annuities due between 29 January and 29 July 2001 will not be subject to the payment of a late fine, if paid before 29 July 2001. In respect of payments made, or due, after 29 July 2001, the period of grace of 6 months with late fine will apply.
    • Patents for pharmaceutical products will be allowed, but grant has been postponed to 1 January 2003.
    • Patents must be exploited within three years from grant or four years from the date of filing, which ever term expires later.
    • A compulsory licence may be granted for reasons such as lack of exploitation, public interest, and anti-competitive practices.
    • Notarial certification and consular legalisation will no longer be required for supporting documentation.

    05th June 2001


    Vietnam - Patents - Extension of Patent Term to 20 years

    According to Article 69.2 of Decree 63/CP amended and supplemented by Decree 6/2001/ND-CP of 1 February 2001, all patents for invention having a duration of less than 20 years can now be extended until the 20th year counted from their filing dates. Therefore, all Vietnam patents that have a filing date prior to 1 July 1996 and which were granted for 15 years from their priority date under the old Vietnamese Patent Regulation, may have their duration extended to 20 years counted from their filing dates, subject to the payment of prescribed annuities.

    Applications for extension of patent duration must be lodged before expiration of the current 15 year term.

    20th April 2001


    Indonesia - Designs - New Industrial Design Act

    A new Industrial Design Act (Law No. 31/2000) came into force in Indonesia on 20 December 2000. The Law maintains the ?first-to-file? principle but provides for more relaxed formalities and a shorter time-frame for prosecution of applications. The Law provides that the time taken for prosecution of a design application, from filing date to registration, should not exceed approximately six (6) months, unless an unforeseen event such as opposition intervenes.

    World-wide novelty at the filing date or priority date is required, but various types of disclosure in the 12 months preceding the relevant date are excused. Certified priority documents may now be submitted up to nine months after the priority date, and other outstanding formal documentation may be submitted up to four months from notification by the Directorate General. Designs have an inextensible 10 year duration, calculated from the application filing date.

    23rd March 2001


    Argentina - Patents - Extension of Patent Term to 20 years

    On 13 February 2001 the Argentine Supreme Court handed down a decision in re: ?Dr Karl Thomae? regarding the applicability to existing patents of the term of twenty years from the application filing date as provided for in Article 33 of the TRIPs Agreement. This issue had been extensively debated in the courts and by Argentine legal commentators.

    Invoking Article 65.2 of the TRIPs Agreement - Argentina being a developing country - the Supreme Court ruled that Article 33 of the TRIPs Agreement came into force in Argentina on 1 January 2000.

    Accordingly, the Supreme Court has now decided that all existing patents that were granted for a term of 15 years and which were still in force on 1 January 2000 are entitled to the twenty year term, provided that the patentee applies for the extension. On the other hand, patents which had already expired by 1 January 2000 will not be granted the extension.

    22nd March 2001


    Andean Community (Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru & Venezuela) - Patents & Designs - Decision 486

    Decision 486, a new ?Common Intellectual Property Regime?, came into effect on 1 December 2000 and replaced Decision 344 in respect of the Andean Community countries. The changes introduced include provision for late submission of outstanding documentation (2 months from notification for patents, 30 working days from notification for designs). The term for submission of priority documents has been set at 16 months from priority date for patents and nine months from priority date for designs. Pharmaceutical products are patentable. Industrial designs now have a 10 year term.

    Although Decision 486 does not require legalisation of documentation, most of the Andean Pact countries retain internal Regulations which do still require legalisation of documentation (usually Consular legalisation, although in Colombia legalisation by Apostille is acceptable).

    The new Regime requires world-wide novelty for patent applications, though disclosure of an invention in the year prior to the filing date or priority date is not taken into account. Notwithstanding these provisions, we are currently awaiting an official decision from the Bolivian authorities on whether internal Regulatory provision will be made for revalidation of foreign granted patents in Bolivia.

    We shall be pleased to provide further details of the changes introduced by Decision 486 upon request.

    22nd February 2001


    Guatemala - Patents & Designs - New Industrial Property Law

    A new Industrial Property Law became effective in Guatemala on 1 November 2000. Provision is now made for claiming priority under the Paris Convention and certified priority documents may be filed up to 15 months after the priority date. Late submission of outstanding documentation is permitted (2 months from filing date for patents). The term of patents is now 20 years from filing date. Designs now have a 10 year term calculated from filing date, extensible to 15 years. Applications which were pending on 1 November 2000 will also benefit from these provisions, when granted.

    22nd February 2001


    Korea (South) - Revision of Patent and Design Laws

    The Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) has announced that revised Intellectual Property laws will enter into effect on 1 July 2001. Various changes having an impact on the prosecution of patent and design applications are discussed below:

    Patent Law: Priority rights: Priority can be amended or added up to 16 months from the priority date. It will not be necessary to submit a certified priority document for priority applications filed in certain designated States. Amendments: Voluntary amendment can now be applied for ?before transmittal of allowance of grant of a patent? or ?before transmittal of the first official action (preliminary rejection)?. Previously the term for amendment was 5 months from the application/priority date. The scope of permissible amendments has also been changed. Amendments are now permissible provided that new matter is not added to the specification or drawings (previously, provided that the ?gist was not changed?). The extent of amendment after a final official action or final rejection will be limited to narrowing the scope of claims, correcting typographical errors, or clarifying ambiguous descriptions.

    Design Law: Miscellaneous changes include: extension of the opposition period after publication of unexamined design application; adoption of a new novelty system; exclusion of functional designs from the scope of protection of design rights; and a prohibition against division of design applications for a set of articles.

    16th February 2001


    Colombia - Ratification of Hague Convention

    Colombia has ratified the Hague Convention, which entered into force in Colombia on 30 January 2001. Consular legalisation of Powers of Attorney and other documents is no longer required, although notarisation and legalisation by Apostille will be necessary.

    31st January 2001


    Malta - New Trade Marks Law

    The new Trade Marks Law of Malta, Act No. XVI of 2000 entitled ?An Act to Regulate Trade Marks? entered into force on 1 January 2001. Chief amongst its new provisions are the following:-

    • The adoption of the International Classification system;
    • Registration of service marks is permitted;
    • The definition of a Trade Mark has been broadened to any sign capable of being represented graphically. This allow for registration of personal names, letters, numerals, and the shape of goods or their packaging. Whilst the Comptroller may refuse registration on absolute or relative grounds, the Trade Mark Office is expected to be more flexible in the examination of applications in future;
    • It is possible to claim priority from an application filed in a member state of the Paris Convention or the WTO, provided that the application is filed within 6 months of the priority date. This differs from the old law, which only allowed a 4 month term;
    • Trade Marks are valid for 10 years from the date of Registration, and renewable for like periods;
    • Powers of Attorney are no longer required for filing applications.

    Transitions provisions provide that pending applications filed under the old law, namely prior to 1 January 2001, will be dealt with under the old law. However, it will be possible for applicants to apply to the Comptroller for their applications to be examined under the provisions of the new law. Surprisingly, there has been no increase in official fees.

    Further information will be posted on the website as and when it is received.

    19th January 2001


    Netherlands Antilles - New Trade Marks Act (1995)

    We have been advised that the new Netherlands Antilles Trade Marks Act (1995) will come into force on 01 January 2001.

    The implementation of the new law should be noted by anyone with an existing Trade Mark Registration, as the new law requires all existing Registrations to be re-registered within 12 months. The new law will reduce the renewal term of all Registrations to 10 years, and we envisage that the renewal date of many existing Registrations will change. For example, if an existing Registration was renewed in 1996, its next renewal date under the old law would be in 2016. Once the Registration is re-confirmed, its next renewal date will be in 2006.

    If you require us to re-register any existing trade mark, we are able to offer a special rate for a renewal filed simultaneously. In the example given above, this would avoid the need to file a renewal again in 2006, when the fees will be higher.

    Other features of the new law include:-

    • the introduction of service marks;
    • The definition of a trade mark has been broadened to include shapes, sounds, smells, etc., as well as 3-dimensional marks;
    • Rights will accrue to the first to register, not the first to use;
    • The period after which a registration may be cancelled for non-use has increased from 3 to 5 years;
    • Collective trade marks will be registerable.
    Additionally, it is envisaged that the Netherlands Antilles will join the Madrid Agreement and the Madrid Protocol in the near future, so it will be possible to obtain protection by means of an International Registration.

    Please do not hesitate to contact us if you require any further information.

    18th December 2000


    Paraguay - New Patent Law - 29 January 2001 Deadline for Revalidation of Foreign Granted Patents

    A new Patent Act (No. 1630) was promulgated in Paraguay on 29 November 2000 and abrogates the previous patent law (No. 773 dated 3 September 1925).

    The new Act shall become effective as from 29 January 2001 and modernises the legal protection of inventions in accordance with international commitments assumed by Paraguay, particularly those set by the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property and the TRIPs agreement.

    For present purposes it is important to note that:

    • The Act introduces absolute (world-wide) novelty as a criterion for patentability. Previously, local novelty was sufficient for patentability and it was accordingly possible to file applications for ?revalidation? of foreign granted patents.
    • No provision is made in the new Act for a transitional period during which owners of foreign granted patents may apply for revalidation. Accordingly, unless application is made before 29 January 2001 it will no longer be possible to revalidate patents in Paraguay.
    Under the new law, provision is made for pharmaceutical product inventions, in respect of which the new Patent Law will become effective only on 1 January 2003. Patent applications for pharmaceutical products submitted since 1 January 1995 will be handled in accordance with the requirements and provisions of the current law, but they will not be granted before 1 January 2003.

    Holders of rights on pharmaceutical products will be entitled to apply for exclusive rights for commercialisation during the transitional period provided that a patent application had been submitted after 1 January 1995, a patent has been granted for that product and approval for commercialising the product has been obtained in another state member of the WTO.

    Once those requirements have been met an "exclusive right for commercialisation in Paraguay" shall be granted for a term of five years. The right holder will be entitled to prevent third parties from offering for sale, selling, distributing or commercialising the product.

    Further information regarding the new Law will be provided upon request.

    Argentina - Patents - Supreme Court rejects revalidation patent applications filed after 1 January 1995

    On 24 October 2000 the Argentine Supreme Court handed down a decision that has changed the outlook for applicants for revalidation patents in Argentina. Before the decision the Federal Court of Appeals had consistently ruled that applications filed before 29 September 1995 had to be accepted and prosecuted by the Argentine Patent Office. However, the Supreme Court has now ruled that all revalidation patent applications filed after 1 January 1995 must be rejected, arguing that the entry into force of the TRIPs Agreement in Argentina abrogated the provisions regarding revalidation patents. In short, unless the Supreme Court reverses its decision, which is most unlikely, any revalidation patent application filed after 1 January 1995 will in all probability be rejected by the Patent Office, and this rejection would be confirmed by the Courts.

    On the other hand the Supreme Court further ruled that patent applications must be governed by the law that was in force at the filing date. Therefore, as long as a revalidation patent application was filed before 1 January 1995 its prosecution should continue under the provisions of the old Patent Law No. 111 which is no longer in force.

    10th November 2000


    Argentina - Patents - Patent Office begins to grant pharmaceutical product patents

    On 24 October 2000 the transitional period under Article 65 of the TRIPs Agreement, that allowed Argentina to postpone patent protection for pharmaceutical products, expired. Since that date the Patent Office has already granted close to 100 patents claiming pharmaceutical products. These are the first pharmaceutical product patents granted in Argentina since a prohibition on such patents began 130 years ago.

    10th November 2000


    Trinidad & Tobago - Transitional Patents (Amendment) Act to provide for re-registration of pending or granted UK patent applications

    As you may be aware, a new Patents Act came into force in Trinidad & Tobago on 1 December 1997. The Patents Act introduced absolute novelty as a requirement for patentability. However, the Act came into force with little forewarning and no provision was made in the original wording of the Act for applicants or owners of pending or granted UK patent applications to file applications for re-registration of the applications as they been permitted to do under the previous Patents and Designs Act, 1900.

    We are pleased to report that the Parliament of Trinidad & Tobago has now passed a Patents (Amendment) Act, 2000 which introduces a one-year transitional period during which patent applications may be lodged in Trinidad and Tobago corresponding to the following:

    (1) UK patent applications still pending as at 12 October 2000. This class covers any of the following having filing dates or priority dates earlier than the date of entry into force of the Trinidad & Tobago Patents Act (1 December 1997):

    • UK national patent applications
    • European patent applications designating the UK
    • PCT international applications designating the UK for a national or European patent

    (2) UK patents granted as at 12 October 2000. Granted UK patents must have had filing dates earlier than the date of entry into force of the Trinidad & Tobago Patents Act (1 December 1997). They must have been granted after 1 December 1994 (this date derives from the three-year time limit calculated from grant which was previously permitted for re-registration applications). They must either be UK national patents or European patents granted in respect of the UK.

    Each such application filed in Trinidad & Tobago will retain the filing date and, if applicable, priority date, of the corresponding UK patent or application. The one-year transitional period commenced on the date of entry into force of the Patents (Amendment) Act, i.e. 12 October 2000, and will accordingly expire on 12 October 2001.

    2nd November 2000


    Georgia (Former Republic of the USSR) - New Importation Patent Law

    A new Importation Patent Law has been adopted by the Georgian Parliament and has entered into force. In terms of the law it is now possible to revalidate foreign granted patents in Georgia. Salient provisions of the law include the following:

    Documentary requirements: Full name and complete postal address of the/each applicant and inventor; specification, claims, abstract and drawings; extract from the register of the foreign country confirming that the relevant foreign patent is in force; power of attorney; and assignment from inventors to applicant.

    Time limit for revalidation of a patent: None.

    Patent term: The term of an importation patent is the lesser of (i) 20 years from the date of issue in the original foreign country; and (ii) 10 years from the date of filing with Sakpatenti (the Georgian Patent Office).

    Miscellaneous: (i) An importation patent may only be granted for an invention patented abroad, examination of which was conducted pursuant to all the criteria of patentability in that country. From this provision it appears that it will not be possible to revalidate patents granted in countries (such as South Africa) which conduct patent examinations only as to formalities. (ii) An importation patent gives the patent owner the exclusive right to use, produce or sell his product, but it does not give him the right to prohibit third parties from importing such product from abroad.

    2nd November 2000


    United Republic of Tanzania - Applications for registration of granted UK patents no longer accepted by Patent Office

    The United Republic of Tanzania Patent Act came into force several years ago and introduced a world-wide novelty requirement, simultaneously repealing Patent Ordinance Cap. 217 which had provided for applications to register granted UK patents in Tanganyika. However, the Patent Office continued to accept such applications for registration despite repeal of the enabling law. We continued to file applications of this type for our clients, but persistently maintained that we had reservations about the validity of patents granted on such applications.

    Recently, we have finally had a rejection of an application for registration of a UK patent before the Tanzanian Patent Office. The Registrar has indicated that any application for a patent in Tanzania must be made under the new legislation and not otherwise.

    Please note that the United Republic of Tanzania Patents Act has not yet been ratified by Zanzibar and accordingly does not extend to the island. Therefore, it remains possible to file applications for registration of granted UK patents in Zanzibar.

    04th October 2000


    Jersey - Trade Marks Law (Jersey) 2000

    The Trade Marks Law (Jersey) 2000 came into force in Jersey on 01 October 2000. The new law reflects many of the provisions of the United Kingdom Trade Marks Act 1994.

    Under the old law, trade mark protection could only be obtained by re-registration in Jersey of a trade mark registered at the United Kingdom Registry. Under the revised law, in addition to this protection, trade mark rights in Jersey will be acquired automatically by virtue of a Community Trade Mark (CTM) Registration or International Registration obtained under the provisions of the Madrid Protocol which extends to the UK, without the requirement for entry in the local Registry of such rights.

    We take the view that this situation is not ideal. Either Jersey should have amended its law to allow for local Registrations to be based upon CTM and International Registrations, as well as national Registrations in the UK, or the law should have been amended so that national UK Registrations are valid automatically as well. The new law discriminates against owners of national UK Registrations, who may not require a CTM themselves, as they will have to continue to pay fees in order to obtain registration of their trade marks locally. On the other hand a company that owns a CTM could use their Registration to prevent Jersey companies from using the name, even if the CTM owner has no use of the mark, and no intention to trade, in Jersey.

    At present, Jersey registered companies are also put at a considerable disadvantage by the new law as they are not entitled to own CTMs. Jersey companies will continue to have to register their trade marks in the UK in order to obtain local protection, even though they may have no intention of using their trade marks outside of Jersey. Although it was originally anticipated that one of the ramifications of this new law would be that Jersey based companies could own CTMs, the European Commission has yet to reach a conclusion on the matter. We are pressing the Jersey authorities to resolve the issue with the Commission as soon as possible, but have been advised that the implementation of the new law is not dependent upon the Commission's findings.

    01st October 2000


    Equatorial Guinea joins OAPI

    With effect from 23 November 2000, it will be possible to obtain protection for patents, trade marks and designs in Equatorial Guinea, by means of an OAPI registration. Equatorial Guinea, which up until now has had no legislation for the protection of intellectual property rights, deposited its instrument of adhesion to the Bangui Accord on 23 September 2000 and its membership of OAPI becomes effective two months thereafter. This means that from 23 November 2000, all applications filed at OAPI will automatically cover Equatorial Guinea, in addition to the 15 existing OAPI member states.

    It will also be possible to extend to Equatorial Guinea any current OAPI trade mark, patent and design registrations filed prior to 23 November 2000, by means of an application for extension of rights. The deadline for filing applications for extension is 23 May 2002.

    29th September 2000


    Hong Kong - New Trade Marks Ordinance
    A new Trade Marks Ordinance was published in June, and is expected to come into force in Hong Kong in early 2001. The provisions of the new law are largely similar to those introduced in the United Kingdom by the Trade Marks Act 1994, and include the following provisions:-

    • A new definition of a trade mark, to include shapes, sounds, smells, etc.
    • Abolition of Parts A and B of the Register.
    • Multi-class applications.
    • Recognition of "well-known" Trade Marks entitled to protection under Article 6 bis of the Paris Convention.
    • A renewal term of 10 years.
    • Revocation (cancellation) of Registrations possible after a period of 3 years' non-use.

    The New Ordinance differs from UK Law on this point, where the term is 5 years. As yet, the new fees and regulations have yet to be published. We are monitoring the situation closely and will update our website when further information becomes available.

    15th September 2000


    GCC - Patent Regulations and Implementing Bylaws amended

    On 15 August 2000 an amended set of GCC Patent Regulations and Implementing Bylaws entered into force. Some important changes were introduced including the following :-

    • Absolute (world-wide) novelty is required - No longer possible to revalidate foreign granted patents.
    • Duration of Patents is now 20 years from date of filing.
    • Annual renewal fees are now payable on pending applications (not just on granted patents).
    • Duplication of patent applications in GCC and in any member state(s) of GCC now permissible.
    • Priority may now be claimed within 12 months from "any previous filing of an application with a national or regional office".
    • Working within 3 years of date of grant (instead of 2 years) is now required.

    Should you require any further advice on the implications of the amendments to the Regulations, please do not hesitate to let us know. Please see our contact page for contact details.

    21st August 2000


    Jamaica - Draft Patent Legislation

    A draft Patent Bill is in circulation in Jamaica but it has not yet been released to the general public. It is not clear when the Bill is expected to be enacted. Under the Bill the novelty requirements for patent applications will become more stringent insofar as inventions will need to satisfy a requirement of absolute (i.e. world-wide) novelty, with certain limited exceptions.

    It is expected that transitional provisions, if any are included in the Bill, will relate only to applications already filed at the time the new Act comes into force.

    Accordingly, we recommend that any contemplated applications for revalidation of foreign granted patents (or "communications from abroad" in respect of their subject matter) be put in hand as soon as possible.

    We shall be happy to answer any questions which you may have on the documentary requirements for either of the two types of applications. Please see our contact page for contact details.

    21st August 2000


    Dominican Republic - New IP Law

    A new Industrial Property Law dated 8 May 2000 was published and entered into force in the Dominican Republic on 10 May 2000.

    This new law has made changes to the requirements for filing Patents and Trade Marks, including the following :-

    Patents:- Absolute novelty of an invention is now required - it is no longer possible to put applications for revalidation of foreign granted patents on file in the Dominican Republic. There are no transitional provisions relating to applications for revalidation, i.e. there is no provision for a transitional period during which proprietors of foreign granted patents may apply for revalidation of their patents.

    Trade Marks:- The International Classification of Goods and protection of services has been introduced. A multi-class registration system is now provided for; however, this has not been implemented so, for the time being, separate applications will have to be filed in each class. The term of registration has been amended to 10 years.

    Document required: Power of Attorney legalised by a Dominican Republic Consul.
    Costs: £510.00 for the 1st class
    £150.00 additional classes
    Costs exclude costs of local translation and local legalisation of documents.

    We expect to receive a copy of the new IP law shortly and would be pleased to answer any questions which you may have regarding its provisions. Please see our contact page for contact details.

    21st August 2000


    Kiribati - Proposed New Industrial Property Law

    Plans are afoot to amend the Industrial Property Law of Kiribati to recognise the country's obligations under the TRIPs Agreement. The Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Tourism has obtained a draft law from WIPO and is currently seeking approval of the law by the Attorney General's office. Further developments in this connection will be reported in this forum.

    15th August 2000


    Lebanon - New Law on Patents and Semiconductor Products

    On 25 July 2000 the Lebanese Parliament enacted a new Patent Law which will enter into force within weeks. The new law overhauls Lebanon's decades old law on intellectual property protection and brings the law into compliance with TRIPs. Absolute novelty of the invention before the filing or priority date is required of an application. Software, pharmaceutical compositions and micro-organisms are all patentable. Specifications may be in English or French. The term of patents under the new law will be 20 years as from the date of filing, and all patents which are in force on the date of implementation of the new law will benefit from the 20 year duration.

    The law also provides for the issue of certificates of registration of semiconductor topographies, having a term of 10 years from the filing date.

    We will be pleased to advise clients of the filing requirements under the new Act.

    31st July 2000


    Malaysia - 1 September 2000 deadline to re-file United Kingdom design applications

    Until 1 September 2000 it will be possible, under the recent Malaysia Industrial Designs Act, to re-file United Kingdom design applications which were pending on 1 September 1999 and retain the same priority date. The priority date of the UK application will thus become the priority date of the Malaysian application.

    After the above deadline it will not be possible to benefit from the same priority date as that claimed in the corresponding UK application. Nevertheless, the UK application will not in itself bar registration in Malaysia as the test of novelty is confined to disclosure within Malaysia.

    We will be happy to advise clients regarding the documentary requirements for registration.

    28th July 2000


    Singapore - New Registered Designs Bill

    A new Registered Designs Bill is expected to be passed towards the end of this year. The Bill provides for a designs system similar to that currently in operation in the United Kingdom and Hong Kong. A registered design in the UK will no longer extend automatically to Singapore. However, UK designs which are registered when the law comes into effect will be deemed to be registered in Singapore, but only for their current 5 year term. To extend protection beyond that period, an extension application will have to be filed in Singapore before the UK due date for renewal. A UK design may be extended in this way up to the full 25-year term enjoyed by the design in the UK.

    For new applications to be filed in Singapore under the Bill, once it has been passed, the following provisions are made:

    • priority may be claimed within 6 months from a first application in a Convention or WTO country;
    • the date of registration will be the date of filing (or priority date if applicable);
    • the initial period of registration is 5 years from the date of filing (or priority date if applicable), extensible by two additional periods of 5 years up to a maximum of 15 years.

    Further developments will be reported.

    28th July 2000


    Honduras - New Patent Law

    A new IP law entered into force on 28 February 2000 in Honduras. Major changes to the Patent Law include:

    • all patents - including pharmaceutical patents - now have a non-extensible 20 year term calculated from the application date (pharmaceutical patents previously had a term of 17 years);
    • computer programs per se are not patentable; and
    • genetic and biological material created by technical means are patentable.

    28th July 2000


    Turks & Caicos Islands - Registration of Service Marks

    We have just been advised by the Registry in the Turks & Caicos Islands that it is now possible to register Service Marks in that jurisdiction.

    Although we have no further details to report in this regard at present, we have asked them to provide us with full details and shall make a further posting as soon as we are able.

    ... more as it develops ...

    17th July 2000


    OAPI - Extension of IP rights to Mali, Guinea and Guinea Bissau

    On 22 June 2000, the President of the Administrative Council passed a special resolution to extend the deadline for filing extensions of OAPI rights to Mali, Guinea and Guinea Bissau for a further two months from the original deadline of 4 June 2000. Accordingly, it will still be possible to file OAPI extension applications up to 4 August 2000.

    17th July 2000


    Thailand - Amendment to Trademark Act 1991

    The Trademark Act (Issue No. 2) 2000 entered into force on 30 June 2000. The most important aspects of the amendment are as follows:-

    • The amendment of the objection to trade marks consisting of juristic (company) names. Under the existing law, an application to register LYSAGHT filed in the name of Lysaght & Co. Limited would attract such an objection, unless represented in a special or particular manner. Under the amended law, only an application to register the company name in full (not represented in a special or particular manner) would attract such an objection.
    • Combinations of colours represented in a special or particular manner will be registerable, as will 3-dimensional shapes if deemed distinctive.
    • Publication fees are abolished, but applications will be published automatically for opposition purposes after acceptance.
    • Priority can now be claimed by applicants from all WTO member countries.
    • Previously, cancellation petitions against Registrations on the basis that the petitioner has a better title to the trade mark, i.e. against Registrations obtained in bad faith, had to be filed through the Thai Courts within 5 years of the grant of the Registration concerned. Such actions may now be filed before the Trade Mark Board at the Registry, and there is no 5 year statute of limitations. However, cancellation proceedings before the Board are only available to petitioners with registered trade marks in Thailand.
    • The Trade Mark Board of the Registry must now include individuals from the private sector with a specialist knowledge of intellectual property. It is hoped that this will lead to more sensible decisions in the future.

    Whilst we take the view that Thailand is in need of a completely new Trade Marks Act, these amendments to the law should nevertheless be welcomed as a step in the right direction.

    Please do not hesitate to contact us if you require any further information.

    05th July 2000


    Brunei Darussalam - Introduction of new Trade Mark and Patent Laws

    With effect from 1st June 2000, a new Trade Marks Law came into effect in Brunei, affording protection for the following :

    • Multi-class applications
    • Service classes

    Furthermore, under the new Law, the renewal term will change from 7 & 14 years, to 10 & 10 years.

    Also, a new Patents Law is due to come into force in Brunei with effect from 1st September 2000. This new Patents Law will serve to stop people re-registering UK granted patents in Brunei, and will be in most other respects similar to the Singapore Patents Law.

    Further details will be posted as and when they occur but, obviously, should you require more information at this stage, please contact us.

    9th June 2000


    Brunei Darussalam - Trade Mark Order 1999

    The New Trade Mark Law of Brunei Darussalam, The Trade Mark Order 1999, will come into force on 1 June 2000.

    Major changes to be brought about by the new law include recognition of the TRIPS provisions, the acceptance of applications to cover service classes, and multi-class applications. The terms of the Order are very similar to the Trade Marks Act 1994 in the United Kingdom.

    However, the Rules are not yet available, so it remains to be seen when applications will be prosecuted under the terms of the new law. Further information will be posted on this website when available.

    16th May 2000


    Mozambique - ARIPO and PCT membership

    Mozambique has become a member state of ARIPO and with effect from 8 May 2000 may be designated in any ARIPO patent application, including PCT applications entering the ARIPO regional phase (notwithstanding that Mozambique was not a member of ARIPO when the relevant PCT international application was filed).

    Furthermore, on 18 February 2000 Mozambique deposited its instrument of accession to the PCT and will become bound by the PCT on 18 May 2000. Consequently, in any PCT international application filed on or after 18 May 2000, Mozambique may be designated and because it will be bound by Chapter II of the PCT, may also be elected.

    12th April 2000


    Bahrain - Changes to Pending Applications

    As of 20 February 2000, the Industrial Property Office no longer accepts amendments on pending Trade Mark and Service Mark applications. This decision does not apply to pending Patent and Design applications, which can still be amended at any time.

    24th March 2000


    Macao - New Industrial Property Law following upon handing over of Macao to the People's Republic of China

    A "one-country, two-systems" arrangement has been implemented in Macao with effect from 20 December 1999, the date on which Portugal handed Macao over to China. The two-systems arrangement has been guaranteed for a period of 50 years. As regards industrial property matters, a new Decree-Law was promulgated on 13 December 1999. The Law reproduces much of the Portuguese Industrial Property Code, but also contains various new provisions required to adapt the law to the new system of government and to modernise it. The new law will take effect upon publication in the Official Bulletin of a decision by the Governor regarding applicable fees for the various acts provided for.

    The following are some of the more important aspects of the Decree-Law:

    • Rights granted under the previous Portuguese Industrial Property Code will remain valid in Macao but will be subject to the new legal system and the authority of the local government rather than the Industrial Property Office in Lisbon (all Portuguese administrative bodies situated outside Macao have ceased to have any competence in the territory).
    • Portuguese may continue to be used as a working language.
    • The Paris Convention and TRIPs are recognised as applying in Macao and have greatly influenced the text of the Law.
    • Priority rights and remedies for unfair competition are provided for and regulated.
    • Judicial appeal of almost all administrative decisions involving the ownership of industrial property rights is provided for.
    • The following industrial property rights are regulated: patents, utility patents, Supplementary Protection Certificates for drugs and phytopharmaceutical products, extension of foreign patents, semiconductor topographies, designs, trade marks, names and emblems of establishment, appellations and awards.
    • New terms: trade marks (7 years from grant date, renewable indefinitely); names and emblems of establishment (10 years from grant date, renewable indefinitely).

    3rd March 2000


    Dominica - New Patents Act in force - Registration of UK and EP(UK) patents to be phased out.

    A new Patents Act (Act No. 8 of 1999) has recently entered into force in Dominica. The wording of the Act follows modern trends in patent legislation. In terms of the new Act absolute novelty (with certain standard exceptions) will be required of applications. It will be possible to claim priority from national, regional or international patent applications filed in any State party to the Paris Convention or member of the World Trade Organisation. As Dominica is bound by the Patent Co-operation Treaty the Act includes provisions concerning national phase patent applications.

    A 12-month transitional period effective from the date of entry into force of the Act is available during which owners of UK or EP(UK) granted patents (or persons who have filed applications for such patents) may file an application for the grant of a patent for the same invention under the provisions of the new Act. The application will be accorded the filing date or priority date accorded to the UK or EP(UK) application or grant.

    Please contact our offices if you require further information. We are currently investigating the various documentary requirements for new applications under the Act and will be pleased to answer any questions which you may have in this regard.

    17th February 2000


    Gulf Co-Operation Council (GCC) - Termination of provisions for filing patents of importation

    In terms of Article 15 of the GCC Patent Law it has been possible to file applications for patents of importation based upon corresponding foreign granted patents, notwithstanding that their subject matter has been disclosed to the public. This Article is analogous to Article 27 of the Saudi Arabian Patent Law, under which the Saudi Patent Office has granted many patents of importation.

    However, an amendment of the GCC Patent Law to delete Article 15 is currently under consideration and is expected to be implemented during the course of this year. Absolute novelty (with limited exceptions) will thereafter be required of applications. Clients with granted patents wishing to secure corresponding protection in the GCC Member States (Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates) should therefore make arrangements for lodging applications at the GCC Patent Office as soon as possible, as it is unlikely that much notice will be given before the amendment is effected.

    16th February 2000


    Tonga - Implementation of the Industrial Property Act 1994

    The (new) Industrial Property Act 1994 came into force on 1st February 2000. The new law provides for:

    Trade Marks

    • Multi (international) class applications, covering goods and/or services
    • Convention Priority claims
    • A local examination procedure
    • Opposition procedure
    • 10 year term, renewable for like periods

    To maintain the validity of trade marks already protected in Tonga under the now repealed (old) law - United Kingdom Trade Mark Registration Act 1939 - they must be "re-registered" within 12 months of the coming into force of the new Act, and they will retain the same filing date/priority date as under the 1939 Act. The deadline for re-registering existing trade mark rights is therefore 1st February 2001.

    We are currently in the process of contacting our many clients with existing trade mark rights in Tonga, providing them with a list of the marks and full details for each case.

    Patents and Designs

    Patents and Designs are now able to be protected in Tonga, and we are analysing the new law at present and will publish news on this site in due course.

    Please contact us if you require more details about the new law in Tonga and our charges for conducting work there.

    11th February 2000


    Jersey - Amendment of Trade Marks Law

    A number of amendments have been made to the Jersey Trade Marks Law, the most significant of which is to provide for protection in Jersey of UK rights acquired through the registration of a Community Trade Mark or International Registration.

    Although it was originally anticipated that the new law would be in force in Jersey by the end of March 2000, recent correspondence with the Registry has indicated that the date of coming into force of the new law will be nearer the end of the year 2000.

    Under the old law, trade mark protection could only be obtained by re-registration in Jersey of a trade mark registered at the United Kingdom Registry. Under the revised law, in addition to this protection, trade mark rights in Jersey will be acquired automatically by virtue of a Community Trade Mark registration or International registration which extends to the UK, without the requirement for entry in the local Registry of such rights.

    Although it was originally anticipated that one of the ramifications of this new law would be that Jersey based companies could own CTMs, correspondence with OHIM in Alicante has indicated that this will depend upon the recommendations of the European Commission, which has yet to reach a conclusion on the matter.

    We are continuing to monitor this situation, and shall post further developments on our web-site, as and when they occur.

    3rd February 2000


    Brunei Darussalam - New Trade Marks Law

    Brunei Darussalam will shortly be introducing a new Trade Marks Law. Although passed on 30th August 1999, the regulations have not yet been finalised, but we have been assured it will be enacted as a piece of legislation very soon.

    Major changes to be brought about by the new law include recognition of the TRIPS provisions, the acceptance of applications to cover service classes, and multi-class applications.

    Further developments will be reported.

    14th January 2000


    Singapore - Amendments to the Patents Law

    With effect from 20th December 1999, Singapore amended its Patent Law to allow for slightly longer deadlines for various actions.

    We will be happy to advise clients with Patents in Singapore of these new deadlines should they wish to contact us.

    14th January 2000


    Latvia - Madrid Protocol

    The Madrid Protocol entered into force in the Republic of Latvia on 5th January 2000.

    6th January 2000


    Sierra Leone - Accession to the Madrid Agreement and Madrid Protocol

    On 28th September 1999, Sierra Leone acceded to the Madrid Protocol concerning the International Registration of Trade Marks, and therefore the Protocol entered into force with respect to Sierra Leone on 28th December 1999. Sierra Leone had previously adopted the Madrid Agreement.

    At present the Sierra Leone Trade Marks Act allows only for the registration of goods in accordance with the pre-1938 U.K. Classification system (Schedule III). However, the enabling legislation is being intensively worked on to bring in changes to include the adoption of the International Classification for both goods and services and it is hoped that this will come into force during the early part of 2000. All our clients will be informed as soon as there is anything further to report.

    6th January 2000


    Netherlands Antilles - New Trade Marks Law

    As anticipated, the introduction of the new law, due to come into force on 1st January 2000, has been further delayed. The Newsroom will be updated as soon as we have definitive information regarding the introduction of the new law, although this is not expected for some time.

    2nd December 1999


    Uruguay - Revalidation of foreign granted patents not possible after 18 January 2000

    A new Patent, Utility Model and Industrial Design Act will be implemented in Uruguay on 18 January 2000 (see entry dated 16 November 1999 below). As from 18 January 2000, it will no longer be possible to file applications for revalidation of foreign granted patents, and absolute novelty will be required of new applications. Clients with foreign granted patents who wish to extend their patent protection to Uruguay must therefore ensure that applications for revalidation are put on file in Uruguay before 18 January 2000.

    An application for revalidation must be based on the first granted patent of a family and must be filed within three years of the date of grant of the first granted patent. In order to obtain a filing date a Spanish translation of the specification of the first granted patent is required. A legalised, certified copy of the first granted patent is also required to complete the documentation for the application, but this can follow within three months of the filing date.

    We have experience in the filing of applications for revalidation in Uruguay, and should be pleased to assist clients wishing to file such applications. However, we are prepared to give an undertaking that applications will be put on file before the above deadline only if we receive instructions in this regard before 15 December 1999.

    30th November 1999


    Jordan - Amendments to the current Trade Mark & Patent Laws

    Amendments to the Trade Mark and Patent Law have been published in the Official Gazette of Jordan No. 4389 dated 1st November, 1999 and are effective as of 1st December, 1999.

    The main changes introduced by the new Laws are:-

    Trade Marks

    • Service marks in Classes 35 to 42 of the International Classification can now be registered.
    • Duration of Registration is 10 years from the registration date, renewable for 10-year periods. (Trade Marks registered or renewed before the effective date shall be renewed for 10 years when their current term expires).
    • Protection is now recognised for well-known Trade Marks.
    • Trade Marks become vulnerable to cancellation if there has been no use for a period of 3 years.


    Patents

    • The Patent term has been extended from 16 years to 20 years.
    • Annuities wil be payable annually from the 2nd.
    • Pharmaceutical products are now registrable.

    26th November 1999


    Yemen - New IP Regulations

    The Ministry of Supply and Trade in Yemen issued decree No. 263 dated 1st October 1999, amending the structure of the classes.

    Classes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 16, 21, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32 have been divided into subclasses, the other classes remain unchanged.

    The process of dividing the subclasses has resulted in a 50% increase in the filing fees.

    19th November 1999


    Morocco - Morocco joins the PCT

    Morocco became bound by the PCT from 8 October 1999 and can therefore now be designated in PCT international patent applications.

    19th November 1999


    Tanzania - Tanzania joins the PCT

    The United Republic of Tanzania became bound by the PCT from 14 September 1999. This would appear to suggest that patent protection in both Tanganyika and Zanzibar can now be sought by way of a PCT application designating Tanzania, and this is the view held by WIPO. However, clients should be aware that uncertainty exists as to whether Zanzibar is bound by the United Republic of Tanzania Patents Act of 1987. If Zanzibar is not bound by this legislation then no mechanisms exist for entering the PCT national phase in Zanzibar. Clients would be advised not to place reliance exclusively on the possibility of a PCT national phase application for Zanzibar. Where possible an application for re-registration of a granted UK/EP patent in terms of the existing law should be made, until clarity is reached.

    Tanzania became bound by the Harare Protocol of ARIPO on 3 August 1999. This means that PCT applications having international filing dates on or after 14 September 1999 may designate Tanzania for an ARIPO patent as well as a national patent. Once again, however, there is uncertainty as to whether an ARIPO patent can be valid and enforceable in Zanzibar in the absence of laws providing for substantive patent applications. Re-registration of a granted UK/EP patent is advisable where possible.

    19th November 1999


    United States of America - Trademark Law Treaty Implementation Act of 1998 (TLTIA)

    The TLTIA came into effect in the U.S. on 30th October 1999. This introduces a number of changes in the regulations governing trade marks. Chief amongst these is the abolition of the requirement for applicants to sign the application form, which will now be accepted from an attorney or agent on filing, although it transpires that applicants will still have to sign the form later to complete filing formalities.

    17th November 1999


    Uruguay - New Patent, Utility Model and Industrial Design Act.

    A new Patent, Utility Model and Industrial Design Act has been promulgated and will be implemented on 18 January 2000. The implementing regulations have not yet been issued but will become available before that date.

    The term of patents under the new Act will be 20 years as from the date of application. Provisions relating to patentable and non-patentable subject matter, novelty, etc. recognise Uruguay's commitments under TRIPS and are for the most part in accordance with world-wide trends. Pharmaceutical compositions and chemical products, which have not been patentable under the current law, will be patentable. However, as is the case for current "black box" applications, allowance of applications for inventions filed in these fields under the new law will be delayed until 1 November 2001. Methods of treatment will not be patentable under the new Act.

    There are very few changes to the law of utility models and industrial designs. A change has been made to the duration of these forms of protection. Utility models and designs will now be granted for a period of 10 years, instead of five as before, and may be extended for a further five year term.

    16th November 1999


    Portugal - Powers of Attorney

    Please note that powers of attorney are no longer required to file Trade Marks, Patents, Industrial Models or Renewals in Portugal.

    16th November 1999


    Equatorial Guinea to join OAPI

    The application of Equatorial Guinea to join OAPI was accepted by the OAPI Administrative Council at its recent meeting in Niger. Equatorial Guinea will be the 17th territory to join the union.

    Equatorial Guinea's membership of OAPI will take effect two months from the date of formal deposit of its instrument of adhesion, which is due to take place shortly.

    Equatorial Guinea has no independent intellectual property legislation of its own, but from the effective date of OAPI membership, all applications filed at OAPI will cover Equatorial Guinea, and it will also be possible to apply for the extension of existing OAPI registrations to Equatorial Guinea, within a time limit of 18 months from the effective membership date.

    12th November 1999


    Thailand - Proposed Amendment to Trademark Act 1991

    A draft amendment to the existing trade mark law of Thailand has passed the first reading of the House of Representatives. The main changes addressed by the draft include:-

    1. The question of juristic name registration. Presently, the Registrar can refuse registration of trade marks consisting of the name of a juristic person (in other words, a legal entity) such as a name of a company, unless it is presented in a stylised form. The proposed amendment will clarify that only the full name of a company will have to be presented in a stylised form to be registerable as a trade mark.
    2. Combinations of colours, shapes or forms of an object will be registerable, provided that they are considered distinctive.
    3. The requirement to pay publication fees will be abolished. Applications approved for registration will automatically be published in the Trademark Gazette for opposition purposes.

    The amendment will also grant new powers of searching premises and seizing evidence to the competent authorities, which are expected to assist in the fight against counterfeiting.

    It is hoped that the amendment will become law by the year 2000. Watch this space for news of further developments.

    9th November 1999


    Introducing a new member of the Lysaght team

    We are very pleased to welcome on board Rory Moore, who joined us on 1st November 1999, and will enable us to enhance and develop the quality and range of services we can offer our patent clients.

    Rory recently qualified as a patent attorney in South Africa, and holds a B.Sc. with majors in Chemistry and Applied Chemistry, a B.Sc. (Hons.) degree in Chemistry, and an LLB degree. He trained as a patent attorney at the South African law firm of Adams & Adams, and in 1998 he joined the South African firm of Hahn & Hahn Inc. as an associate. As well as overseeing the prosecution of our patent applications, Rory's reponsibilities at Lysaght & Co. will include the management and development of our patent information systems.

    5th November 1999


    Uruguay - Patentability of Pharmaceutical Preparations and Chemical Products

    Many of our patent clients will be aware that pharmaceutical preparations and compositions are not patentable in Uruguay. Patents filed in Uruguay containing such claims are currently filed as "Black Box" applications under the provisions of TRIPS, and are not being published or examined.

    The Patent Law of Uruguay will change in this respect on 1st November 2001 and thereafter, such matter will be patentable. It should be noted however that methods of treatment will not be patentable under the new Law.

    29th October 1999


    Laos - Assignments of Trade Mark Registrations

    The Laotian Trade Mark Office has announced a new requirement for recording Assignments of Trade Mark Registrations. If the Registration concerned has been registered for 5 years or longer, it is necessary to submit a notarised Affidavit of Use or Non-Use, in addition to the notarised power of attorney and Deed of Assignment.

    If the trade mark in question has been in use in Laos, evidence of use must be submitted, and this can take the form of a certificate from a Laotian importer or distributor. If the trade mark has not been used, a justifiable circumstance explaining the reason for non-use must be stated on the Affidavit. Such circumstances may include the inability to find an importer or distributor in Laos.

    It should be stressed that this requirement only applies in the case of Registrations over 5 years old, and only applies in the case of Assignments.

    27th October 1999



    DPR of Korea (North) - New Law on Trade Marks

    North Korea has adopted a new trade marks law which makes it compulsory for trade marks to be registered, if a trade mark is going to be used.

    It is vital that anyone selling in, exporting from, and importing to North Korea registers all trade marks they intend to use in the country. Lysaght & Co. has established reliable contacts in North Korea, and we would be pleased to assist anyone wishing to register trade marks there.

    16th September 1999


    Netherlands Antilles - New Trade Marks Law

    We have just heard that the introduction of the new Trade Marks Law has been delayed until 1st January 2000, when it will "definitely" come into force. However, given that this is the fifth time the introduction has been delayed, we are not optimistic. All further news and developments will be made available as and when it is received.

    16th September 1999


    Venezuela - Legalisation of Documents

    As of 16th March 1999, documents requiring legalisation for filing purposes require legalisation by Apostille, rather than Consular legalisation.

    23rd July 1999


    Mozambique - New Intellectual Property Law

    The new Intellectual Property Law was introduced on 4th July 1999, and the first filings of trade marks were accepted at the Registry on 5th July 1999. A "single-class" system has been adopted, and applications are being accepted with the required notarised power of attorney to follow within three months of the filing date. Convention priority dates can be claimed as can colours. The duration of a trade mark registration is 10 years from the filing date in Mozambique. Mozambique had previously joined the Madrid Agreement and the Madrid Protocol with effect from 7th October 1998.

    We welcome applications and enquiries for Mozambique from our clients.

    16th July 1999


    Malaysia - New Designs Law

    We have been advised that a new Designs Law is to come into effect in Malaysia on 1st September 1999.

    Designs already registered in the UK before 1st September 1999 will continue to be in force but are subject to the payment of extension fees in Malaysia. However, designs registered in the UK based on applications filed on or after 1st September 1999 will no longer extend to Malaysia.

    More detailed information is available on request.

    16th July 1999


    Netherlands Antilles - New Trade Marks Act

    The introduction of the new Trade Mark Act has been further delayed, although we have been informed unofficially that it is due to come into force on 1st October 1999.

    The most important feature of the new law to proprietors of existing trade marks in the Netherlands Antilles is that existing Registrations will have to be re-registered within a year of the implementation of the new law. At the moment the official fees, and the procedure for re-registration have yet to be finalised, but as soon as the fees are known we will be advising all our clients with registrations in the Netherlands Antilles accordingly.

    However, given that the new law was originally due to come into force on 1st January 1998, and has now been delayed 4 times, we will not be taking any further action until something official is known, as a further delay can be expected. In the meantime, clients with Netherlands Antilles registrations should consider which trade marks in their portfolio are suitable candidates for re-registration.

    12th July 1999


    Laos - Powers of Attorney

    The Laotian Trade Mark Office has recently decreed that general powers of attorney will no longer be accepted for filing applications. All applications must now be accompanied by a notarised power of attorney clearly stating the applicant's name and address, as well as the trade mark and classes to be covered by the application.

    24th May 1999


    Spain - Protection for certain goods/services.

    The Spanish Trade Mark Office has recently altered its practice to accept certain goods and services which could not be protected before. The most significant of these is the protection of retail services in stores which may now be accepted for registration in class 35.

    Additionally, specifications which include the terms fittings, accessories and spare parts may now be accepted as long as they relate to other products claimed in the same class. The terms cannot be accepted as a goods specification on its own.

    A specification reading franchise services will not be accepted as the term is too imprecise. However, franchise services relating to other services will be accepted.

    16th April 1999


    Our Charges - Update with effect from 1st April 1999

    With effect from 1st April 1999, our charges for filing Trade Marks, Patents & Designs will be revised.

    We have already despatched copies of our new scales of fees to all our regular clients, and would be happy to give you a copy if you require one.

    Please feel free to fill in one of our forms requesting scales of fees in the event that you have not already received same and would like to do so.

    29th March 1999


    OAPI - Extension of Patent, Trade Mark & Design Rights to Guinea Bissau

    Guinea Bissau joined OAPI with effect from 8th July 1998, and all applications filed at OAPI after that date cover Guinea Bissau.

    OAPI also introduced a provision for extending existing OAPI patent, trade mark and design registrations to new territories which join the union, upon payment of an extension fee. We have been awaiting the issue of regulations and forms for processing such applications, and these have now been published.

    The regulations provide not only for the extension of existing OAPI registrations to new territories which join the union, but also for the extension of existing rights in those territories which previously had their own registration system, to OAPI. The regulations also apply to Mali and Guinea which joined OAPI on 30th September 1984 and 13th January 1990 respectively.

    The deadline for filing applications for extension is 18 months from the date a new territory joins OAPI, but in the case of Mali, Guinea and Guinea Bissau, a term of 18 months from 4th December 1998 has been granted - i.e. applications must be filed before 4th June 2000.

    We will be pleased to provide information regarding cost and documents required for filing on request.

    16th March 1999


    MADAGASCAR - Increase in Official Fees

    With effect from 2nd April 1999, the Official Fees for filing Trade Marks, Patents and Designs in Madagascar are set to increase by 200-500%. This is mainly in order to compensate for the devaluation of the Malagasy Franc since OMAPI came into operation in 1994.

    19th February 1999


    SINGAPORE - New Trade Marks Act 1998

    Singapore has amended its Trade Marks Law with effect from the 15th January 1999. The new law is based on the UK Trade Marks Act 1994 and incorporates amendments to ensure compliance with obligations under TRIPS and the Paris Convention.

    The main provisions of the new Act are as follows :-

    • Trade Marks are defined as visually perceptible signs capable of graphical representation. Signs include shape, colour and aspects of packaging. 3D and shape marks registrable.
    • Retails services are registrable.
    • Although multi class applications were promised, in effect the system remains virtually unchanged as separate numbers and certificates will be issued for each class.
    • Part A & B divisions abolished and registrability criteria lowered.
    • Prohibition of false geographical indications for wines and spirits.
    • Protection of well-known marks.
    • Association and conditions of registration abolished.
    • Registered Users are abolished and licenses and sublicenses are effective without recordal at the Registry.
    • Special enforcement rights given to exclusive licensees.
    • Collective marks introduced.
    • Infringement test widened.
    • Relief for groundless threats of infringement.
    • Border enforcement measures by custom officers.
    • Implementation of obligations under the Paris Convention and TRIPS Agreement.
    • Registration of securities introduced.



    If any further information is required, please do not hesitate to contact us.

    3rd February 1999


    NETHERLANDS ANTILLES - New Trade Marks Act

    A new Trade Marks Act was expected to come into force on 1st January 1999, but its implementation has been postponed. The target date for the introduction of the new law has now been set for 1st July 1999.

    Contrary to previous information made available to us, under the terms of the new law all existing registrations will have to be re-registered, and trade mark proprietors will be given one year in which to do this. The new law reduces the renewal term from 20 years to 10, although it is understood that the opportunity will be given to apply for renewal simultaneously with re-registration at a reduced fee, which will allow the existing expiry date to be maintained.

    For instance, a trade mark registered in 1998 currently carries a renewal date of 2018. Under the new law the renewal date will be 2008, but if renewal is applied for at the time of re-registration, the renewal date of 2018 will be maintained.

    Other provisions of the new law will include :-

    • Rights in trade marks will accrue to the first to register, rather than the first to use.
    • A broadened definition of trade marks to include signs, tokens, shapes, colours and sounds.
    • Registration of Collective Marks.
    • A term of 5 years after which registrations may be cancelled for non-use


    Details of the re-registration procedure, and the fees involved, have yet to be published, but further information will be given as soon as this is known.

    20th January 1999


    MOZAMBIQUE - Introduction of a New I.P. Law

    An Industrial Property Office has been established, and the new Law is likely to be published and introduced during the first half of 1999.

    The Registrar is accepting "provisional" applications on file and whilst these have no legal effect at present, in all likelihood they will be allotted a filing date corresponding to the first working day of the Trade Marks Office.

    At present there are no official fees being requested for the filing of provisional trade mark applications, and these will only be called for once the allocation of official filing dates and numbers has commenced. At that stage applicants will have the option of either paying the fee for an application to continue, or alternatively if the application is no longer of interest, then it can be withdrawn.

    We welcome instructions from all our clients to file provisional trade mark applications in Mozambique.

    20th January 1999


    OAPI - Revision of the Bangui Accord

    The Bangui Accord has been under review to ensure compliance with obligations of the OAPI member states under GATT TRIPS. The revised law was formally approved by OAPI's Administrative Council in December 1998, and the document now awaits signature by the ministers of the member states. Thereafter, the law requires ratification by the national assemblies of at least 10 of the member states in order to come into force, and it is hoped that this process will have been completed by 1 January 2000.

    Lysaght & Co. has been closely involved with the revision of the law, and we are pleased that a number of problems we have encountered over the years have been resolved by the revised law. Inter alia the revised law :-

    • eliminates the requirement to prove use on renewal of a trade mark, and working for extension of term for a patent;
    • introduces the right to apply for extension of existing OAPI rights to new states that join OAPI, and to extend existing rights in new states to existing OAPI registrations;
    • eliminates the 12 month deadline for recordal of changes of ownership;
    • eliminates the requirement to obtain approval from the Competent National Authority in respect of licences granted by a foreigner to a national of one of the OAPI member states.

    20th January 1999


    GULF COOPERATION COUNCIL - GCC

    A regional patent filing system for the countries of the middle east came into operation on 3rd October 1998. It is now possible to file a single application to cover the 6 present member states :-

    Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman and United Arab Emirates

    As well as offering a centralised registration procedure, the GCC enables patent proprietors to obtain protection by means of registration in Oman and Qatar which previously had no registration systems of their own.

    20th January 1999


    TONGA - New Industrial Property Law

    A new Industrial Property Law is expected to come into force during 1999, with a commencement date now likely to be 1st July 1999. It had been widely publicised that the new law would be effective from 1st January 1999, but it has been delayed due to local budgetary constraints.

    To maintain their validity, existing registrations (which are all based on U.K. granted trade marks) must be re-registered under the new law within a period of 12 months from the law coming into force.

    The introduction of a substantive registration system will provide for :-

    • Multi (international) class applications, covering goods and/or services
    • Convention Priority claims
    • A local examination procedure
    • Opposition procedure
    • 10 year term, renewable for like periods

    20th January 1999


    Guinea Bissau joins OAPI

    Guinea Bissau became a signatory of the Bangui Accord on 8th May 1998, and with effect from 8th July 1998 all patent, trade mark and design applications filed at OAPI cover Guinea Bissau in addition to the existing 14 member states.

    Provision has also been made for the extension of existing OAPI patents, trade marks and designs to Guinea Bissau by payment of an extension fee.

    In the past, the only way of obtaining protection for a newly joined territory was to file a fresh application at OAPI. This caused complications and considerable expense, particularly in the case of trade marks, where an earlier OAPI registration already existed. We have been making representations to OAPI ever since Mali and Guinea became members, that provisions to extend existing OAPI rights to a newly joined territory should be made.

    It would appear that our pleas have finally been heeded, and in respect of trade marks for which an OAPI registration already exists, it will not be necessary to file a fresh application to obtain protection in Guinea Bissau.

    If you are interested in extending any OAPI registrations to Guinea Bissau, please let us know, and we will supply you with further details.

    1st July 1998


    Japan - Abolition of Powers of Attorney

    Japanese patent law was amended on 1st April 1998. Powers of attorney are no longer required for filing patents, design or trade mark applications, although they are still needed for filing PCT cases.

    11th June 1998


    Bosnia &AMP Herzegovina - Trade Marks

    The Bosnian Trade Mark Office announced on 28th May 1998 that the deadline for effectingrevalidation applications of former Yugoslavian trade marks has been extended from 30th May1998 to 31st December 1998. All Yugoslavian trade marks that were registered prior to 1stMarch 1992 can be revalidated in Bosnia & Herzegovina. Documents required are: 1) SpecialPower of Attorney, simply signed, and 2) Photocopy of Yugoslavian Certificate ofRegistration (and Certificate of Renewal where appropriate).

    29th May 1998


    Kenya - Trade Marks

    On 26th May 1998, WIPO received the deposit by the Government of the Republic ofKenya of its instrument of accession to the Madrid Agreement and Madrid ProtocolConcerning the International Registration of Trade Marks. The Madrid Agreement and theMadrid Protocol will enter into force with respect to the Republic of Kenya, on 26th June1998.
    However, news of the local implementing regulations is still awaited, and until such time asthese are issued and published, extension of International Trade Mark registrations to Kenyawill not be possible.

    29th May 1998


    Syria - Patents and Trade Marks

    New Regulations (No. 2) concerning the filing and registration of Patents and Trade Markswere issued by the Ministry of Supply and Domestic Trade on 26th March 1998. However,their implementation was suspended a few days after their issuance, and therefore thedocumentation required for filing a patent or a trade mark remains as it was before 26th March1998. The modified new regulations are expected to be re-issued within the next few months.

    29th May 1998


    Cyprus - New Patent Law

    This is to advise that Cyprus has now become a Member of PCT and has enacted a new Patent Law both with effect from 1st April 1998.

    The new Cyprus Patent Law will provide for the registration of patents which satisfy the criteria of patentability viz novelty, inventiveness and industrial applicability. The new law sets up for the first time an independent system where ore registering elsewhere.

    9th April 1998


    OAPI (African Union) - Patents, Trade Marks and Designs

    The Bangui Accord is under review, and amongst the proposed amendments is the abolition of the proof of use requirements on renewal. It is hoped the revised law will become effective in May 1999

    7th April 1998


    Hong Kong - Re-registration of EP(UK) or UK Patents

    The New Patents Ordinance came into force on 27th June 1997.

    For all EP(UK) and UK patents already granted but where no application for registration has been made in Hong Kong prior to 27th June 1997, a Request for Registration and Grant must be filed in Hong Kong within 5 years from the grant date of the EP(UK) or UK patents, or at the latest by 26th June 1998 (Friday), whichever is the earlier.

    7th April 1998


    Cayman Islands - Trade Marks

    Amendments to the Trade Marks Law to enable a registration to be obtained in the Cayman Islands on the basis of a European Community Trade Mark (CTM) registration, have been passed by the Legislative Assembly in early March 1998. However, the amendments do not take effect until they are published in the Gazette, so for the time being Cayman Islands trade marks can only be based on granted U.K. marks.

    7th April 1998


    Trinidad & Tobago - Patents

    With the coming into force of the New Patent Act on 1st December 1997, it is no longer possible to re-register United Kingdom granted patents. Protection is now obtained through the national or PCT route.

    7th April 1998



    Bophuthatswana, Transkei and Venda - Patents, Trade Marks & Designs


    On 1 January 1998 a new South African Law came into force regarding the above territories where in the past independent protection for patents, trade marks and designs could only be obtained by separate registration.
    Under the new Law, South African patent, trade mark and design registrations now automatically extend to these territories unless there exists a separate registered and maintained right in one or all of the territories.
    The practical implication of this is that it is now no longer necessary to maintain such separately registered rights in any or all of those territories if a corresponding South African right exists.

    7th April 1998


    Return to Main Page
    Return to the Lysaght & Co. Newsroom




  • © 2007-11 Lysaght & Co.